Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ovid: Rockwood And Green’s Fractures In Adults

Editors: Bucholz, Robert W.; Heckman, James D.; Court-Brown, Charles M.; Tornetta, Paul
Title: Rockwood And Green’s Fractures In Adults, 7th Edition
> Table of Contents > Section One – General Principles: Basics > Complications > 27 – Acute Compartment Syndrome

Acute Compartment Syndrome
Margaret M. McQueen
Acute compartment syndrome occurs when pressure rises
within a confined space in the body, resulting in a critical reduction
of the blood flow to the tissues contained within the space. Without
urgent decompression, tissue ischemia, necrosis, and functional
impairment occur. The acute compartment syndrome should be
differentiated from other related conditions.
Awareness of the different definitions associated with a
compartment syndrome is important. Acute compartment syndrome is
defined as an elevation of intracompartmental pressure to a level and
for a duration that without decompression will cause tissue ischemia
and necrosis.
Exertional compartment syndrome is elevation of
intercompartmental pressure during exercise, causing ischemia, pain,
and rarely neurological symptoms and signs. It is characterized by
resolution of symptoms with rest but may proceed to acute compartment
syndrome if exercise continues.
Volkmann’s ischemic contracture is the end stage of
neglected acute compartment syndrome with irreversible muscle necrosis
leading to ischemic contractures.
The crush syndrome is the systemic result of muscle
necrosis commonly caused by prolonged external compression of an
extremity. In crush syndrome muscle necrosis is established by the time
of presentation, but intracompartmental pressure may rise as a result
of intracompartmental edema, causing a superimposed acute compartment
Well over a century has passed since the first
description of ischemic muscle contractures was published in the
medical literature.


The first report of the condition was attributed to Hamilton in 1850 by Hildebrand61
but Hamilton’s original description has never been found. The credit
for the first full description belongs to Richard Von Volkmann148
who published a summary of his views in 1881. He stated that paralysis
and contractures appeared after too tight bandaging of the forearm and
hand, were ischemic in nature, and were caused by prolonged blocking of
arterial blood. He recognized that muscle cannot survive longer than 6
hours with complete interruption of its blood flow and that 12 hours or
less of too tight bandaging were enough to result in “dismal permanent
crippling.” In 1888 Peterson recognized that ischemic contracture could
occur in the absence of bandaging but did not postulate a cause.115

The first major reports appeared in the English speaking
literature in the early twentieth century. At this time it was
suggested that swelling after removal of tight bandaging might
contribute to the contracture and that the contracture was caused by
“fibroustissue forming elements” or a myositic process.28,125,150
By the early part of the twentieth century published accounts of the
sequence of events in acute compartment syndrome were remarkably
similar to what is known today, with differentiation between acute
ischemia caused by major vessel rupture, acute ischemia caused by
“subfascial tension,” the late stage of ischemic contracture, and the
separate concept of nerve involvement.9
This paper was the first description of fasciotomy to relieve the
pressure. The importance of early fasciotomy was suggested at this time9,107 and confirmed by prevention of the development of contractures in animal experiments.68
During the Second World War attention was directed away
from these sound conclusions. A belief arose that ischemic contracture
was caused by arterial injury and spasm with reflex collateral spasm.
Successful results from excision of the damaged artery34,44
were undoubtedly owing to the fasciotomy carried out as part of the
exposure for the surgery. An unfortunate legacy of this belief persists
today in the dangerously mistaken view that an acute compartment
syndrome cannot exist in the presence of normal peripheral pulses.
The arterial injury theory was challenged by Seddon in 1966.128
He noted that in all cases of ischemic contracture there was early and
gross swelling requiring prompt fasciotomy, and that 50% of his cases
had palpable peripheral pulses. He was unable to explain muscle
infarcts at the same level as the injury on the basis of arterial
damage. He recommended early fasciotomy.
In their classic paper McQuillan and Nolan reported on fifteen cases complicated by “local ischemia.”85
They described the vicious circle of increasing tension in an enclosed
compartment causing venous obstruction and subsequent reduction in
arterial inflow. Their most important conclusion was that delay in
performing a fasciotomy was the single cause of failure of treatment.
Knowledge of the epidemiology of acute compartment
syndrome is important in defining the patient at risk of developing
acute compartment syndrome. The epidemiology of acute compartment
syndrome has been described in a cohort of 164 patients drawn from a
defined population in the United Kingdom.84 From adolescence, younger patients are at more risk of compartment syndrome.
The incidence of acute compartment syndrome in a westernized population is 3.1 per 100,000 of the population per annum.84
The annual incidence for males is 7.3 per 100,000 compared with 0.7 per
100,000 for females, a tenfold increase in risk for males. The age and
gender-specific incidences are illustrated in Fig. 27-1, showing a Type B pattern (see Chapter 3) or the L-shaped pattern described by Buhr and Cooke.18 The mean age for the whole group was 32 years; the median age for males was 30 years and for females 44 years.
FIGURE 27-1 The annual age and gender specific incidence of acute compartment syndrome.
The underlying condition causing acute compartment syndrome was most commonly a fracture (69% of cases) (Table 27-1).
Similar figures have been reported in children, with 76% of cases
caused by fracture, predominantly tibial diaphyseal, distal radius, and
forearm.8 The most common fracture
associated with acute compartment syndrome in adults is tibial
diaphyseal fracture. The prevalence of acute compartment syndrome


in tibial diaphyseal fractures is reported as 2.7% to 15%,* with the differences in prevalences likely to be because of different diagnostic techniques and selection of patients.

TABLE 27-1 Conditions Associated with Injury Causing Acute Compartment Syndrome Presenting to an Orthopaedic Trauma Unit

Underlying Condition

% of Cases

Tibial diaphyseal fracture


Soft tissue injury


Distal radius fracture


Crush syndrome


Diaphyseal fracture forearm


Femoral diaphyseal fracture


Tibial plateau fracture


Hand fracture(s)


Tibial pilon fractures


Foot fracture(s)


Ankle fracture


Elbow fracture dislocation


Pelvic fracture


Humeral diaphyseal fracture


TABLE 27-2 Less Common Causes of Acute Compartment Syndrome

Conditions Increasing the Volume of Compartment Contents


Soft tissue injury

Crush syndrome (including use of the lithotomy position)90



Fluid infusion (including arthroscopy)10,129

Arterial puncture130

Ruptured ganglia/cysts29


Snake bite145

Nephrotic syndrome139

Leukemic infiltration144

Viral myositis76

Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis137

Conditions Reducing Compartment Volume


Repair of muscle hernia4

Medical Comorbidity



Bleeding diathesis/anticoagulants63

The second most common cause of acute compartment
syndrome is soft tissue injury, which added to tibial diaphyseal
fracture makes up almost two thirds of the cases. The second most
common fracture to be complicated by acute compartment syndrome is the
distal radius fracture, which occurs in approximately 0.25% of cases.
Forearm diaphyseal fractures are complicated by acute compartment
syndrome in 3% of cases. The prevalence of acute compartment syndrome
in other anatomic locations is rarely reported. Other less common
causes of acute compartment syndrome are listed in Table 27-2.
As mentioned, from adolescence younger patients are at
more risk of compartment syndrome. In tibial diaphyseal fracture the
prevalence of acute compartment syndrome was reported as being three
times greater in the under 35-year-old age group, and in distal radial
fractures the prevalence is 35 times less in the older age group.84 Adolescents have been recognized as having a high rate (8.3%) of compartment syndrome after tibial fracture.23
Analysis of 1403 tibial diaphyseal fractures presenting to the
Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit over the period from 1995 to 2007
shows that there were 160 cases of acute compartment syndrome (11.4%).
Using univariate analysis, significant risk factors for the development
of acute compartment syndrome were youth (P
<0.001), and male gender. Males were almost six times more likely to
develop acute compartment syndrome if aged between 20 and 29 years
compared with those aged over 40 years. Youth, regardless of gender, is
therefore a significant risk factor for the development of acute
compartment syndrome after tibial fracture. The only exception to youth
being a risk factor in acute compartment syndrome is in cases with soft
tissue injury only. These patients have an average age of 36 years and
are significantly older than those with a fracture.63
High energy injury is generally believed to increase the
risks of developing an acute compartment syndrome. Nevertheless, in
tibial diaphyseal fracture complicated by acute compartment syndrome
the proportion of high and low energy injury shows a slight
preponderance of low energy injury (59%).84
In the same population there is an equal number of high energy and low
energy injury in tibial diaphyseal fractures uncomplicated by acute
compartment syndrome.24 In the
larger Edinburgh series there was an increased risk of acute
compartment syndrome in closed compared with open fractures (P
<0.05). This suggests acute compartment syndrome may be more
prevalent after low energy injury, possibly because in low energy
injury the compartment boundaries are less likely to be disrupted and
an “autodecompression” effect is avoided. The concept of patients with
lower energy injury being at higher risk is supported by the
distribution of severe open fractures in each group. In those
complicated by acute compartment syndrome, 20% are Gustilo Type III84; in the whole population of tibial fractures, 60% were Type III.24
It is important to note that open tibial diaphyseal fractures remain at
risk of acute compartment syndrome, which occurs in approximately 3%,84
but it appears that the lower Gustilo types are at more risk, again
possibly because of the lack of disruption of the compartment
Distal radial and forearm diaphyseal fractures
associated with high energy injury are more likely to be complicated by
acute compartment syndrome, probably because of the high preponderance
of young males who sustained these types of injury. This is illustrated
by a comparison of the age and gender related incidence of distal
radius fractures complicated by acute compartment syndrome (Fig. 27-2). The likely explanation for the


preponderance of young males with acute compartment syndrome is that
young men have relatively large muscle volumes, whereas their
compartment size does note change after growth is complete. Thus young
men may have less space for swelling of the muscle after injury.
Presumably the older person has smaller hypotrophic muscles allowing
more space for swelling. There may also be a protective effect of
hypertension in the older patient.

The annual age specific incidence of all distal radius fractures
compared with the annual age specific incidence of acute compartment
syndrome in distal radial fractures.
TABLE 27-3 Risk Factors for Development or Late Diagnosis of Acute Compartment Syndrome


Altered pain perception


Altered conscious level

Tibial fracture

Regional anesthesia

High energy forearm fracture

Patient controlled analgesia

High energy femoral diaphyseal fracture


Bleeding diathesis/anticoagulants

Associated nerve injury

Polytrauma with high base deficit, lactate levels, and transfusion requirement

The second most common type of acute compartment
syndrome is that arising in the absence of fractures. The majority of
these arise subsequent to soft tissue injury, particularly a crushing
type injury, but some arise with no preceding history of trauma.63
In children 61% of cases of acute compartment syndrome in the absence
of fracture are reported as being iatrogenic. 117 Patients with acute
compartment syndrome without fracture tend to be older and have more
medical comorbidities than those with a fracture. They are more evenly
distributed between the genders with a male to female ratio of five to
one. The use of anticoagulants seems also to be a risk factor for the
development of acute compartment syndrome.
Patients with polytrauma are at particular risk of delay
in the diagnosis of their acute compartment syndrome so identification
of at risk factors in this group is of particular importance.35
Kosir and his coauthors examined risk factors for lower limb acute
compartment syndrome in 45 critically ill trauma patients with the
institution of an aggressive screening protocol.73
The prevalence of acute compartment syndrome was 20%. High base
deficits, lactate levels, and transfusion requirements were significant
risk factors in this group.
The possible risk factors for the development or late diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome are listed in Table 27-3.
As well as demographic risk factors, altered pain perception can delay
diagnosis. This can occur if the patient has an altered conscious state
or with certain types of anesthesia or analgesia.52,87,105
There remains uncertainty about the exact physiological
mechanism of the reduction in blood flow in the acute compartment
syndrome, although it is generally accepted that the effect is at small
vessel level, either arteriolar, capillary, or venous levels.
The critical closing pressure theory states that there
is a critical closing pressure in the small vessels when the transmural
pressure (the difference between intravascular pressure and tissue
pressure) drops.19 Transmural
pressure (TM) is balanced by a constricting force (TC) consisting of
active and elastic tension derived from smooth muscle action in the
vessel walls. The equilibrium between expanding and contracting forces
is expressed in a derivation of Laplace’s law:
TM = TC ÷ r
where r is the radius of the vessel.
If, because of increasing tissue pressure, the
transmural pressure drops to a level such that elastic fibers in the
vessel wall are no longer stretched and therefore cannot contribute any
elastic tension, then there will be no further automatic decrease in
the radius. TC ÷ r then becomes greater than TM and active closure of
the vessel will occur. This concept has been verified in both animal
and human local vascular beds.6,112,121,160
Ashton was the first to relate these findings to acute compartment
syndrome and concluded that whatever the cause of the raised tissue
pressure, blood flow will be decreased and may temporarily cease
altogether as a result of a combination of active arteriolar closure
and passive capillary compression, depending on vasomotor tone and the
height of the total tissue pressure.7
Critics of this theory doubt the possibility of maintaining arteriolar
closure in the presence of ischemia, which is a strong local stimulus
for vasodilatation.91 Ashton noted
that flow resumes after 30 to 60 seconds of maintained tissue pressure
and attributes this to vessel re-opening possibly because of an
accumulation of vasodilator metabolites.6
A second theory is the arteriovenous gradient theory.91,98
According to this theory the increases in local tissue pressure reduce
the local arteriovenous pressure gradient and thus reduce blood flow.
When flow diminishes to less than the metabolic demands of the tissues
(not necessarily to zero), then functional abnormalities result. The
relationship between arteriovenous (AV) gradient and the local blood
flow (LBF) is summarized in the equation:
LBF = Pa – Pv ÷ R
where Pa is the local arterial pressure, Pv is the local
venous pressure, and R is the local vascular resistance. Veins are
collapsible tubes and the pressure within them can never be less than
the local tissue pressure. If tissue pressure rises as in the acute
compartment syndrome, then the Pv must rise also, thus reducing the AV
gradient (Pa – Pv) and therefore the local blood flow. At low AV
gradients compensation from local vascular resistance (R) is relatively
ineffective59 and local blood flow
is primarily determined by the AV gradient. Matsen and his colleagues
presented results on human subjects demonstrating reduction of the AV
gradient with elevation of the limb in the presence of raised tissue
pressure.98 This theory has been
supported by recent work that demonstrated that with external pressure
applied, simulating acute compartment syndrome, venous and capillary
flow ceased but arterioles were still capable of carrying flow.147
This disproves the critical closing theory but supports the hypothesis
of reduced arteriovenous gradient as the mechanism of reducing blood
A third theory, the microvascular occlusion theory
postulates that capillary occlusion is the main mechanism reducing
blood flow in acute compartment syndrome.49 Measurement of capillary


pressure in dogs with normal tissue pressures revealed a mean level of
25 mm Hg. Hargens and his colleagues suggest that a tissue pressure of
similar value is sufficient to reduce capillary blood flow.49
Resultant muscle ischemia leads to increased capillary membrane
permeability to plasma proteins, increasing edema and obstruction of
lymphatic by the raised tissue pressure. Nonetheless, the authors admit
that reactive hyperemia and vasodilatation both tend to raise the
critical pressure level for microvascular occlusion. Note, however,
that this work was done in the presence of normal tissue pressures, and
it has also been pointed out that capillaries are collapsible tubes91 and their intravascular pressure ought to rise in the presence of raised tissue pressure. Hargens’ theory49
is supported by more recent work demonstrating reduction of the number
of perfused capillaries per unit area with raised tissue pressures.54

Effects of Raised Tissue Pressure on Muscle
Regardless of the mechanism of vessel closure, reduction
in blood flow in the acute compartment syndrome has a profound effect
on muscle tissue. Skeletal muscle is the tissue in the extremities most
vulnerable to ischemia and is therefore the most important tissue to be
considered in acute compartment syndrome. Both the magnitude and
duration of pressure elevation have been shown experimentally to be
important influences in the extent of muscle damage.
There is now universal agreement that rising tissue
pressure leads to a reduction in muscle blood flow. A number of
experimental studies have highlighted the importance of perfusion
pressure as well as tissue pressure in the reduction of muscle blood
flow. MR measurements of cellular metabolic derangement (PH, tissue
oxygenation, and energy stores) and histological studies, including
electron microscopy and videomicroscopy studies of capillary blood
flow, have shown that critical tissue pressure thresholds are 10 to 20
mm Hg below diastolic blood pressure or 25 to 30 mm Hg below mean
arterial pressure.54,57,60,89
Increased vulnerability in previously traumatized or ischemic muscle
has been demonstrated when the critical threshold may occur at tissue
pressures more than 30 mm Hg below mean arterial pressure.11
The ultimate result of reduced blood flow to skeletal
muscle is ischemia followed by necrosis, with general agreement that
increasing periods of complete ischemia produce increasing irreversible
Evidence indicates that muscle necrosis is present in its greatest
extent in the central position of the muscle, and that external
evaluation of the degree of muscle necrosis is unreliable. The duration
of muscle ischemia dictates the amount of necrosis, although some
muscle fibers are more vulnerable than others to ischemia. For example,
the muscles of the anterior compartment of the leg contain Type 1
fibers or red slow twitch fibers, whereas the gastrocnemius contains
mainly Type 2 or white fast twitch fibers. Type 1 fibers depend on
oxidative metabolism of triglycerides for their energy source and are
more vulnerable to oxygen depletion than Type 2 fibers whose metabolism
is primarily anaerobic.77 This may explain the particular vulnerability of the anterior compartment to raised intracompartmental pressure.
Effects of Raised Tissue Pressure on Nerve
There is little dispute about the effects of raised
tissue pressure on neurological function. All investigators note a loss
of neuromuscular function with raised tissue pressures but at varying
pressure thresholds and duration.40,51,93,134
In a study on human neurological function, Matsen et al. found
considerable variation of pressure tolerance that could not be
attributed to differences in systemic pressure.95
The mechanism of damage to nerve is as yet uncertain and
could result from ischemia, ischemia plus compression, toxic effects,
or the effects of acidosis.
Effects of Raised Tissue Pressure on Bone
Nonunion is now recognized as a complication of acute compartment syndrome.25,26,69,82,100
It was first suggested by Nario in 1938 that “Volkmann’s disease”
caused obliteration of the “musculodiaphyseal” vessels and caused
frequent pseudarthrosis.110 McQueen
observed a reduction in bone blood flow and bone union in rabbit tibiae
after an experimentally induced acute compartment syndrome.80
It is likely that muscle ischemia reduces the capacity for development
of the extraosseous blood supply on which long bones depend for healing.
Reperfusion Injury
The reperfusion syndrome is a group of complications
following reestablishment of blood flow to the ischemic tissues and can
occur after fasciotomy and restoration of muscle blood flow in the
acute compartment syndrome. Reperfusion is followed by an inflammatory
response in the ischemic tissue that can cause further tissue damage.
The trigger for the inflammatory response is probably the breakdown
products of muscle.15 Some breakdown
products are procoagulants that activate the intrinsic clotting system.
This results in increasing microvascular thrombosis, which in turn
increases the extent of muscle damage.
If there is a large amount of muscle involved in the
ischemic process, the inflammatory response may become systemic. In
acute compartment syndrome this is most likely to occur in the crush
syndrome. Procoagulants escape into the systemic circulation and
produce systemic coagulopathy with parallel activation of inflammatory
mediators. These then damage vascular endothelium, leading to increased
permeability and subsequent multiple organ failure. Systemic clotting
and the breakdown products of dead and dying cells also lead to
activation of white blood cells, with the release of additional
inflammatory mediators such as histamine, interleukin, oxygen free
radicals, thromboxane, and many others.15
This is the basis for the use of agents such as antioxidants,
antithromboxanes, antileukotrienes, and anti-platelet-activating
factors that modify the inflammatory process. Some of these agents have
been shown in the laboratory to be capable of reducing muscle injury.1,70,71,149
Prompt diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome is the
key to a successful outcome. Delay in diagnosis has long been
recognized as the single cause of failure of the treatment of acute
compartment syndrome.85,92,122,124
Delay in diagnosis may be because of inexperience and lack of awareness
of the possibility of acute compartment syndrome, an indefinite and
confusing clinical presentation,99,143 or to anesthetic or analgesic techniques that mask the clinical signs.52,87,105

Delay in treatment of the acute compartment syndrome can
be catastrophic, leading to serious complications such as permanent
sensory and motor deficits, contractures, infection and at times,
amputation of the limb.106,117,124
In serious cases there may be systemic injury from the reperfusion
syndrome. A clear understanding of the clinical techniques necessary to
make an early diagnosis is therefore essential to any physician
treating acute compartment syndrome in order to avoid such
complications. As well as improving outcome, early recognition and
treatment of acute compartment syndrome is associated with decreased
indemnity risk in potential malpractice claims.14
Pain is considered to be the first symptom of acute
compartment syndrome. The pain experienced by the patient is by nature
ischemic, and usually severe and out of proportion to the clinical
situation. Pain may, however, be an unreliable indication of the
presence of acute compartment syndrome because it can be variable in
its intensity.30,94,153 Pain may be absent in acute compartment syndrome associated with nerve injury62,159 or minimal in the deep posterior compartment syndrome.92,94
Pain is present in most cases because of the index injury but cannot be
elicited in the unconscious patient. Kosir and his coauthors abandoned
clinical examination as part of their screening protocol for critically
ill trauma patients because of the difficulty in eliciting reliable
symptoms and signs in this group.73
Children may not be able to express the severity of their pain, so
restlessness, agitation, and anxiety with increasing analgesic
requirements should raise the suspicion of the presence of an acute
compartment syndrome.8 Both Shereff135 and Myerson108 state that clinical diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome in the foot is so unreliable that other methods should be used.
Pain has been shown to have a sensitivity of only 19%
and a specificity of 97% in the diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome
(i.e., a high proportion of false negative or missed cases but a low
proportion of false positive cases).143
There is general agreement, however, that pain if present is a
relatively early symptom of acute compartment syndrome in the awake
alert patient.143
Pain with passive stretch of the muscles involved is
recognized as a symptom of acute compartment syndrome. Thus pain is
increased for example in an anterior compartment syndrome when the toes
or foot are plantarflexed. This symptom is no more reliable than rest
pain, because the reasons for unreliability quoted above apply equally
to pain on passive stretch. The sensitivity and specificity of pain on
passive stretch are similar to those for rest pain.143
Paraesthesia and hypoesthesia may occur in the territory
of the nerves traversing the affected compartment and are usually the
first signs of nerve ischemia, although sensory abnormality may be the
result of concomitant nerve injury.155,159
Ulmer reports a sensitivity of 13% and specificity of 98% for the
clinical finding of paraesthesia in acute compartment syndrome, a false
negative rate that precludes this symptom from being a useful
diagnostic tool.143
Paralysis of muscle groups affected by the acute compartment syndrome is recognized as being a late sign.143
This sign has equally low sensitivity as others in predicting the
presence of acute compartment syndrome, probably because of the
difficulty of interpreting the underlying cause of the weakness, which
could be inhibition by pain, direct injury to muscle, or associated
nerve injury. If a motor deficit develops, full recovery is rare.17,26,122,127,157 Bradley17 reported full recovery in only 13% of patients with paralysis as a sign of their acute compartment syndrome.143
Palpable swelling in the compartment affected may be a
further sign of compartment syndrome; although the degree of swelling
is difficult to assess accurately, making this sign very subjective.
Casts or dressings often obscure compartments at risk and prevent
assessment of swelling.73 Some
compartments such as the deep posterior compartment of the leg are
completely buried under the muscle compartments, obscuring any swelling.
Peripheral pulses and capillary return are always intact
in acute compartment syndrome unless there is major arterial injury or
disease or in the very late stages of acute compartment syndrome when
amputation is inevitable. If acute compartment syndrome is suspected
and pulses are absent, then arteriography is indicated. Conversely, it
is dangerous to exclude the diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome
because distal pulses are present.
Using a combination of clinical symptoms and signs increases their sensitivity as diagnostic tools.143
To achieve a probability of over 90% of acute compartment syndrome
being present, however, three clinical findings must be noted. The
third clinical finding is paresis; thus to achieve an accurate clinical
diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome the condition must be allowed
to progress until a late stage. This is clearly unacceptable and has
led to a search for earlier, more reliable methods of diagnosis.
Several techniques were developed to measure
intracompartmental pressure (ICP) once it was appreciated that acute
compartment syndrome was caused by increased tissue pressure within the
affected compartment. Because raised tissue pressure is the primary
event in acute compartment syndrome, changes in ICP will precede the
clinical symptoms and signs.83
There are a number of methods available to measure ICP.
One of the first to be used was the needle manometer method, using a
needle introduced into the compartment and connected to a column filled
partly with saline and partly with air.153
A syringe filled with air is attached to this column, as is a pressure
manometer or transducer. The ICP is the pressure that is required to
inject air into the tubing and flatten the meniscus between the saline
and the air. This method was modified by Matsen and his colleagues to
allow infusion of saline into the compartment.96,97
The ICP is the pressure resistance to infusion of saline. These
methods, although simple and inexpensive have some drawbacks. A danger
exists of too large a volume being infused, possibly inducing acute
compartment syndrome. It is probably the least accurate of the
measurement techniques available, with falsely high values having been
recorded in comparison with other techniques101 and falsely low values in cases of very high ICP.138 A needle with only one perforation at its tip also can become easily blocked.

The wick catheter was first described for use in acute compartment syndrome by Mubarak and his coauthors.102
This is a modification of the needle technique, in which fibrils
protrude from the bore of the catheter assembly. This allows a large
surface area for measurement and prevents obstruction of the needle; it
is ideal for continuous measurement. A disadvantage of this technique
is the possibility of a blood clot blocking the tip or air in the
column of fluid between the catheter and the transducer, which will
dampen the response and give falsely low readings. There is a
theoretical risk of retention of wick material in the tissues.
The slit catheter was first described by Rorabeck and his associates.123
This operates on the same principal as the wick catheter in that it is
designed to increase the surface area at the tip of the catheter by
means of being cut axially at the end of the catheter (Fig. 27-3).
The interstitial pressure is measured through a column of saline
attached to a transducer. Patency can be confirmed by gentle pressure
over the catheter tip; an immediate rise in the pressure should be
seen. Care must be taken to avoid the presence of air bubbles in the
system as this can, like the wick catheter, result in falsely low
readings. The slit catheter is more accurate than the continuous
infusion method101 and is as accurate as the wick catheter.133
Attempts to improve the reliability of ICP measurement
led to the placement of the pressure transducer directly into the
compartment by siting it within the lumen of a catheter. The solid
state transducer intracompartmental catheter (STIC) was described in
1984 and measurements were correlated with conventional pressure
monitoring systems.78 This device is
now commercially available and widely used, although to retain patency
of the catheter for continuous monitoring. an infusion must be used
with its attendant problems. The alternative is intermittent pressure
measurements, which is likely to cause significant discomfort to
patients and is more labor intensive. Newer systems with the transducer
placed at the tip of the catheter do not depend on a column of fluid
and therefore avoid the problems of patency.158 These systems are more expensive, however, and are a potential problem for resterilization.
All the methods above measure ICP, which is an indirect
way of measuring muscle blood flow and oxygenation. Near infrared
spectroscopy measures tissue oxygen saturation noninvasively by means
of a probe placed on the skin. This has proved to correlate to tissue
pressures experimentally5 and in human volunteers.41 It has also been used to demonstrate the hyperemic response to injury in tibial fracture.136 The technique has promise but requires further validation in humans subjected to injury.64
FIGURE 27-3 The tip of a slit catheter, which can be made easily from standard equipment by cutting two slits in the tip of the catheter.
TABLE 27-4 Recommended Catheter Placements for Compartmental Pressure Monitoring

Anatomic Area

Catheter Placement


Anterior compartment


Anterior compartment

Deep posterior if clinically suspected


Interosseous compartments

Consider calcaneal compartment in hindfoot injuries


Flexor compartment


Interosseous compartment

ICP is usually monitored in the anterior compartment
because this is most commonly involved in acute compartment syndrome
and is easily accessible.82 There is
a risk of missing an acute compartment syndrome in the deep posterior
compartments and some authors recommend measurement of both,58
but measuring two compartments is much more cumbersome. If the anterior
compartment alone is monitored, the surgeon must be aware of the small
chance of deep posterior acute compartment syndrome and measure the
deep posterior compartment pressures if there are unexplained symptoms
in the presence of anterior compartment pressures with a safe
difference between the perfusion pressure and the tissue pressure (ΔP).
It is important to measure the peak pressure within the limb, which
usually occurs within 5 cm of the level of the fracture.58 Recommended catheter placement for each of the anatomic areas is summarized in Table 27-4.
Much debate has occurred about the critical pressure
threshold, beyond which decompression of acute compartment syndrome is
required. After appreciation of the nature of acute compartment
syndrome being raised pressure, debate centered around the use of
tissue pressure alone as indication of the need for decompression. One
level believed to be critical was 30 mm Hg of ICP because this is a
value close to capillary blood pressure.50,104 Some authors felt that 40 mm Hg of tissue pressure should be the threshold for decompression,47,78,96,127 although some recognized a significant individual variation between individuals in their tolerance of raised ICP.47,98
In a series of patients with tibial fractures, a tissue pressure of 50
mm Hg was recommended as a pressure threshold for decompression in
normotensive patients.48
It is now recognized that apparent variation between
individuals in their tolerance of raised ICP is because of variations
in systemic blood pressure. Whitesides and his coauthors were the first
to suggest the importance of the difference between the diastolic blood
pressure and tissue pressure or ΔP.153
They stated that there is inadequate perfusion and relative ischemia
when the tissue pressure rises to within 10 to 30 mm Hg of the
diastolic pressure. There is now good evidence from experimental


work to support this concept57,89
or the similar concept that the difference between mean arterial
pressure and tissue pressure should not be less than 30 mm Hg in normal
muscle or 40 mm Hg in muscle subject to trauma60 or antecedent ischemia.11

This concept was tested in a clinical study designed to
test the hypothesis of the differential pressure as a threshold for
decompression.83 One hundred and
sixteen patients with tibial diaphyseal fractures underwent continuous
intracompartmental pressure monitoring both perioperatively and for at
least 24 hours postoperatively. The differential pressure between the
diastolic blood pressure and the ICP was recorded. Mean pressures over
a 12-hour period were calculated to include the duration of elevated
pressure in the analysis. Three patients had ΔP of less than 30 mm Hg
and underwent fasciotomy. Of the remaining patients, all maintained a
ΔP greater than 30 mm Hg despite a number with ICP greater than 40 mm
Hg. None of these patients underwent fasciotomy and none had any
sequelae of acute compartment syndrome at final review. The authors
concluded that a ΔP of 30 mm Hg is a safe threshold for decompression
in acute compartment syndrome. This has recently been validated by the
same group who examined the outcome in terms of muscle power and return
to function in two groups of patients with tibial fractures.154
The first group of patients all had an ICP of greater than 30 mm Hg and
the second all had an ICP less than 30 mm Hg. Both groups had
maintained a ΔP of greater than 30 mm Hg. There were no differences in
the outcomes between the two groups. The concept of the use of ΔP is
also supported by Ovre et al., who found an unacceptably high rate of
fasciotomies (29%) using an ICP of 30 mm Hg as a threshold for
All of the work quoted above was performed in adults and
with reference to leg compartment syndrome. The threshold may differ
for children who have a low diastolic pressure and are therefore more
likely to have a ΔP less than 30 mm Hg. Mars and Hadley recommend the
use of the mean arterial pressure rather than the diastolic pressure to
obviate this problem.88 It has been
assumed that these pressure thresholds apply equally to anatomic areas
other than the leg, although this has not been formally examined.
Time factors are also important in making the decision
to proceed to fasciotomy. It is well established experimentally and
clinically that both the duration and severity of the pressure
elevation influence the development of muscle necrosis.*
Continuous pressure monitoring allows a clear record of the trend of
the tissue pressure measurements. In situations where the ΔP drops
below 30 mm Hg if the ICP is dropping and the ΔP is rising, then it is
safe to observe the patient in anticipation of the ΔP returning within
a short time to safe levels. If the ICP is rising, the ΔP is dropping
and less than 30 mm Hg, and this trend has been consistent for a period
of 1 to 2 hours, then fasciotomy should be performed. Fasciotomy should
not be performed based on a single pressure reading except in extreme
cases. Using this protocol, delay to fasciotomy and the sequelae of
acute compartment syndrome are reduced without unnecessary fasciotomies
being performed.82
Overtreatment has been cited as a problem with continuous monitoring,67
but this study did not consider the importance of the duration of
raised ICP in the diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome. Some authors
have found compartment pressure monitoring less useful but used
clinical symptoms and signs as their indication for fasciotomy with
pressure monitoring only as an adjunct.3,53 For ICP monitoring to be most effective in reducing delay, it must be used as the primary indication for fasciotomy.
The thigh is divided into three main compartments, both
of which are bounded by the fascia lata and separated by the medial and
lateral intermuscular septa (Fig. 27-4). Their contents and the clinical signs of compartment syndrome in each compartment are summarized in Table 27-5. Involvement of the adductor compartment is rare.
There are four compartments in the leg—anterior, lateral, superficial posterior and deep posterior (Fig. 27-5).
The anterior compartment is enclosed anteriorly by skin
and fascia, laterally by the intermuscular septum, posteriorly by the
fibula and interosseous membrane, and medially by the tibia. Its
contents and the clinical signs of acute compartment syndrome are
listed in Table 27-6.
The lateral compartment is enclosed laterally by skin and fascia, posteriorly by the posterior intermuscular septum, medially


by the fibula, and anteriorly by the anterior intermuscular septum. Its
contents and the clinical signs of involvement in acute compartment
syndrome are detailed in Table 27-6.
The deep peroneal nerve may rarely be affected as it passes through the
lateral compartment en route to the anterior compartment.

A cross section of the thigh demonstrating the three compartments and
the access to them. A, anterior; Ad, adductor; P, posterior.
TABLE 27-5 Compartments of the Thigh, Their Contents, and Signs of Acute Compartment Syndrome





Quadriceps muscles


Femoral nerve

Pain on passive knee flexion

Numbness—medial leg/foot

Weakness—knee extension


Hamstring muscles

Sciatic Nerve

Pain on passive knee extension

Sensory changes rare

Weakness—knee flexion


Adductor muscles

Obturator nerve

Pain on passive hip abduction

Sensory changes rare

Weakness—hip adduction

FIGURE 27-5 A cross section of the leg showing the four compartments. The arrows
show the routes for double incision four compartment fasciotomy. A,
anterior compartment; DP, deep posterior compartment; L, lateral
compartment; SP, superficial posterior compartment.
TABLE 27-6 Compartments of the Leg with Their Contents and Clinical Signs of Acute Compartment Syndrome in Each





Tibialis anterior

Extensor digitorum longus

Extensor hallucis longus

Peroneus tertius

Deep peroneal (anterior tibial) nerve and vessels

Pain on passive flexion—ankle/toes

Numbness—1st web space

Weakness—ankle/toe flexion


Peroneus longus

Peroneus brevis

Superficial peroneal nerve

Pain on passive foot inversion

Numbness—dorsum of foot

Weakness of eversion

Superficial posterior




Sural nerve

Pain on passive ankle extension

Numbness—dorsolateral foot

Weakness—plantar flexion

Deep posterior

Tibialis posterior

Flexor digitorum longus

Flexor hallucis longus

Posterior tibial nerve

Pain on passive ankle/toe extension/ foot eversion

Numbness—sole of foot

Weakness—toe/ankle flexion, foot inversion

The superficial posterior compartment is bounded
anteriorly by the intermuscular septum between the superficial and deep
compartments and posteriorly by skin and fascia. Its contents and the
clinical signs of acute compartment syndrome are summarized in Table 27-6.
The deep posterior compartment is limited anteriorly by
the tibia and interosseous membrane, laterally by the fibula,
posteriorly by the intermuscular septum separating it from the
superficial posterior compartment, and medially by skin and fascia in
the distal part of the leg. Table 27-6 lists the contents of the deep posterior compartment and the likely clinical signs in acute compartment syndrome.
Until recently most authorities believed that there were
four compartments in the foot—medial, lateral, central, and
interosseous (Fig. 27-6). The medial
compartment lies on the plantar surface of the hallux, the lateral
compartment is on the plantar surface of the fifth metatarsal, and the
central compartment lies on the plantar surface of the foot. The
interosseous compartment lies dorsal to the others between the
metatarsals. Their contents are shown in Table 27-7.
Manoli and Weber challenged the concept of four compartments using cadaver infusion techniques.86
They believe that there are nine compartments in the foot, with two
central compartments, one superficial containing flexor digitorum
brevis, and one deep (the calcaneal compartment) (Fig. 27-7)
containing quadratus plantae, which communicates with the deep
posterior compartment of the leg. They demonstrated that each of the
four interosseous muscles and adductor hallucis lie in separate
compartments, thus increasing the number of compartments to nine. The
clinical importance of these anatomic findings has been challenged
after the finding that the barrier between the superficial and
calcaneal compartments becomes incompetent at a pressure of 10 mm Hg,
much lower than that required to produce an acute compartment syndrome.46
The clinical diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome should be
suspected in the presence of severe swelling, but differentiating the
affected compartments is extremely difficult.
FIGURE 27-6 A cross section of the foot showing access from the dorsum of the foot to the compartments. I, interosseous.
TABLE 27-7 Compartments of the Foot and Their Contents




Intrinsic muscles of the great toe


Flexor digiti minimi

Abductor digiti minimi



Flexor digitorum brevis

—Deep (calcaneal)

Quadratus plantae

Adductor hallucis

Adductor hallucis

Interosseous × 4

Interosseous muscles

Digital nerves

There are two compartments in the arm: anterior and posterior (Fig. 27-8).
The anterior compartment is bounded by the humerus posteriorly, the
lateral and medial intermuscular septa, and the brachial fascia
anteriorly. Its contents and the clinical signs of acute compartment
syndrome are detailed in Table 27-8. In late cases paralysis of the muscles innervated by the median, ulna, and radial nerves is seen.
The posterior compartment has the same boundaries as the anterior but lies posterior to the humerus. Its contents and the


clinical signs of acute compartment syndrome are listed in Table 27-8.

A section through the hindfoot showing the medial, superficial, and
deep central (calcaneal) compartments. The medial approach for release
of the calcaneal compartment is shown. FHL, flexor hallucis longus.
A cross section of the arm showing the anterior compartment containing
biceps(B) and brachialis(Br), and the posterior compartment containing
The forearm contains three compartments: volar, dorsal, and “the mobile wad” (Fig. 27-9).
The volar compartment has the ulna, radius, and interosseous membrane
as its posterior limit and the antebrachial fascia as its anterior
limit. Table 27-9 lists the contents and
clinical signs of acute compartment syndrome in the volar compartment
of the forearm. A suggestion has been made that the volar compartment
of the forearm contains three spaces, the superficial volar, deep
volar, and pronator quadratus spaces,38 but in practice it is not usually necessary to distinguish between these at fasciotomy.21
TABLE 27-8 Compartments of the Arm, Their Contents, and Clinical Signs of Acute Compartment Syndrome








Median nerve

Ulnar nerve

Musculocutaneous nerve

Lateral cutaneous nerve

Antebrachial nerve

Radial nerve (distal third)

Pain on passive elbow extension

Numbness—median/ulnar distribution

Numbness—volar/lateral distal forearm

Weakness—elbow flexion

Weakness—median/ulnar motor function



Radial nerve

Ulnar nerve (distally)

Pain on passive elbow flexion

Numbness—ulnar/radial distribution

Weakness—elbow extension

Weakness—radial/ulnar motor function

A cross section of the midforearm. The pronator quadratus compartment
is not shown as it lies in the distal forearm. D, dorsal; V, volar.
The dorsal compartment of the forearm lies dorsal to the
radius, ulna, and interosseous membrane and contains the finger and
thumb extensors, abductor pollicis longus, and extensor carpi ulnaris.
Its contents and the clinical signs of acute compartment syndrome are
summarized in Table 27-9.
General agreement exists that the hand has ten muscle compartments: one thenar, one hypothenar, one adductor pollicis, four


dorsal interosseous, and three volar interosseous compartments (Fig. 27-10).
The thenar compartment is surrounded by the thenar fascia, the thenar
septum, and the first metacarpal. The hypothenar compartment is
contained by the hypothenar fascia and septum and the fifth metacarpal.
The dorsal interosseous compartments lie between the metacarpals and
are bounded by them laterally and the interosseous fascia anteriorly
and posteriorly. The volar interosseous compartments lie on the volar
aspect of the metacarpals, but it is unlikely that these are
functionally separate from the dorsal interosseous compartments because
the tissue barrier between the two cannot withstand pressures of more
than 15 mm Hg.45 The contents of the hand compartments are detailed in Table 27-10.

TABLE 27-9 Compartments of The Forearm, Their Contents, and Signs of Acute Compartment Syndrome





Flexor carpi radialis longus and brevis

Flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus

Pronator teres

Pronator quadratus

Median nerve

Ulnar nerve

Pain on passive wrist/finger extension

Numbness—median/ulnar distribution

Weakness—wrist/finger flexion

Weakness—median/ulnar motor function in hand


Extensor digitorum

Extensor pollicis longus

Abductor pollicis longus

Extensor carpi ulnaris

Pain—passive wrist/finger flexion

Weakness—wrist/finger flexion

Mobile wad


Extensor carpi radialis

Pain on passive wrist flexion/elbow extension

Weakness—wrist extension/elbow flexion

The single most effective treatment for acute
compartment syndrome is fasciotomy, which if delayed can cause
devastating complications. Nevertheless, other preliminary measures
should be taken in cases of impending acute compartment syndrome. The
process may on occasion be aborted by release of external limiting
envelopes such as dressings or plaster casts, including the padding
under the cast. Splitting and spreading a cast has been shown to reduce
ICP as has release of dressings.36 The split and spread cast is the only method that can accommodate increasing limb swelling.161 The limb should not be elevated above the height of the heart as this reduces the arteriovenous gradient.98
Hypotension should be corrected, because this will reduce perfusion
pressure. Oxygen therapy should be instituted to ensure maximum oxygen
FIGURE 27-10
A cross section of the hand showing the muscle compartments. The
adductor pollicis lies more distally. CP, central palmar; H,
hypothenar; I, interosseous; T, thenar.
The basic principle of fasciotomy of any compartment is
full and adequate decompression. Skin incisions must be made along the
full length of the affected compartment. There is no place for limited
or subcutaneous fasciotomy in acute compartment syndrome. It is
essential to visualize all contained muscles in their entirety (Fig. 27-11) in order to assess their viability and any muscle necrosis must be thoroughly débrided to avoid infection.


Subcutaneous fasciotomy is contraindicated for these reasons and also because the skin may act as a limiting boundary.37

TABLE 27-10 The Compartments of The Hand and Their Contents




Abductor pollicis brevis

Flexor pollicis brevis

Opponens pollicis


Abductor digiti minimi

Flexor digiti minimi

Opponens digiti minimi

Dorsal interosseous × 4

Dorsal interossei

Volar interossei × 3

Volar interossei

Adductor pollicis

Adductor pollicis

FIGURE 27-11
Fasciotomy of the anterior and lateral compartments of the leg. Note
that the incision extends the whole length of the muscle compartment
allowing inspection of all muscle groups.
In the leg, all four compartments should be released.
One of the most commonly used techniques is the double incision
four-compartment fasciotomy.103 The
anterior and lateral compartments are released through a lateral skin
incision over the intermuscular septum between the compartments (see Figure 27-5).
The skin may then be retracted to allow fascial incisions over both
compartments. Care must be taken not to injure the superficial peroneal
nerve that pierces the fascia and lies superficial to it in the distal
third of the leg (see Figure 27-11). There is
considerable variation in its course, with approximately three quarters
of the nerve remaining in the lateral compartment before its exit
through the deep fascia and one quarter passing into the anterior
compartment.2 The two posterior compartments are accessed through a skin incision 2 cm from the medial edge of the tibia (see Figure 27-5).
This allows a generous skin bridge to the lateral incision but is
anterior to the posterior tibial artery, especially in open fractures,
to protect perforating vessels that supply local fasciocutaneous flaps.120
The superficial posterior compartment is easily exposed by skin
retraction. The deep posterior compartment is exposed by posterior
retraction of the superficial compartment and is most easily identified
in the distal third of the leg (Fig. 27-12). It
is sometimes necessary to elevate the superficial compartment muscles
from the tibia for a short distance to allow release of the deep
posterior compartment along its length. Care must be taken to protect
the saphenous vein and nerve in this area and to protect the posterior
tibial vessels and nerves.118
FIGURE 27-12
Decompression of the medial side of the leg. The superficial posterior
compartment is being retracted to display the deep compartment. The
scissors are deep to the fascia overlying the deep posterior
Single incision fasciotomy of all four compartments was first described using excision of the fibula,72
but this is unnecessarily destructive and risks damage to the common
peroneal nerve. Single incision four-compartment fasciotomy without
fibulectomy can be performed through a lateral incision that affords
easy access to the anterior and lateral compartments.22
Anterior retraction of the peroneal muscles allows exposure of the
posterior intermuscular septum overlying the superficial posterior
compartment. The deep posterior compartment is entered by an incision
immediately posterior to the posterolateral border of the fibula.
Double incision fasciotomy is faster and probably safer
than single incision methods because the fascial incisions are all
superficial. Using the single incision method, it can be difficult to
visualize the full extent of the deep posterior compartment. Both
methods seem to be equally effective at reducing ICP.103,146
In the thigh and gluteal regions decompression is simple
and the compartments easily visualized. Both thigh compartments can be
approached through a single lateral skin incision (Fig. 27-13),140 although a medial incision can be used over the adductors if considered necessary (see Figure 27-4).
In the foot there are a number of compartments to
decompress, and a sound knowledge of the anatomy is essential. Dorsal
incisions overlying the second and fourth metacarpals allow sufficient
access to the interosseous compartments and the central compartment
that lies deep to the interosseous compartments (see Figure 27-6).
The medial and lateral compartments can be accessed around the deep
surfaces of the first and fifth metatarsal, respectively. Such a
decompression is usually sufficient in cases of forefoot injury, but
when a hindfoot injury, especially a calcaneal fracture, is present a
separate medial incision may be required to decompress the calcaneal
compartment (see Figure 27-7).109,126
Fasciotomy of the arm is performed through anterior and posterior incisions (see Figure 27-8) when the compartments are easily visualized. On rare occasions the deltoid muscle should also be decompressed.27
In the forearm both volar and dorsal fasciotomies may be
performed. In most cases the volar compartment is approached first
through an incision extending from the biceps tendon at the elbow to
the palm of the hand, to allow carpal tunnel decompression


that is usually necessary (Fig. 27-14). Fascial incision then allows direct access to the compartment (see Figure 27-9).
The deep flexors must be carefully inspected after fascial incision.
Separate exposure and decompression of pronator quadratus may be
necessary.21 Often volar fasciotomy
is sufficient to decompress the forearm, but if ICP remains elevated in
the dorsal compartment perioperatively, then dorsal compression is
easily performed through a straight dorsal incision (see Figure 27-9).

FIGURE 27-13 Fasciotomy of the thigh through a single lateral incision.
FIGURE 27-14
Fasciotomy of the forearm in a case of crush syndrome. There is
necrosis of the forearm flexors proximally. The carpal tunnel has been
Decompression of the hand can usually be adequately
achieved using two dorsal incisions that allow access to the
interosseous compartments (see Figure 27-10).
This may often be sufficient, but if there is clinical suspicion or
raised ICP on measurement then incisions may be made over the thenar
and hypothenar eminences, allowing fasciotomy of these compartments.
Management of Fasciotomy Wounds
Fasciotomy incisions must never be closed primarily because this may result in persistent elevation of ICP.55
The wounds should be left open and dressed, and approximately 48 hours
after fasciotomy a “second look” procedure should be undertaken to
ensure viability of all muscle groups. Skin closure or cover should not
be attempted unless all muscle groups are viable.
The wounds may then be closed by delayed primary closure
if possible, although this must be without tension on the skin edges.
Commonly in the leg this technique is possible in the medial but not
the lateral wound. If delayed primary closure cannot be achieved, then
the wound may be closed using either dermatotraction techniques or
split skin grafting. Dermatotraction or gradual closure techniques have
the advantage of avoiding the cosmetic problems of split skin grafting
but may cause skin edge necrosis.66 A further disadvantage is the prolonged time required to achieve closure, which may be up to 10 days.12,66
Split skin grafting although offering immediate skin cover has the disadvantage of a high rate of long-term morbidity.33
The recent introduction of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) systems is
likely to be a significant advantage in this area and may reduce the
need for split skin grafting with a low complication rate.151
Management of Associated Fractures
As is now generally accepted, fractures, especially of
the long bones, should be stabilized in the presence of acute
compartment syndrome treated by fasciotomy.39,42,122,142
In reality the treatment of the fracture should not be altered by the
presence of an acute compartment syndrome, although cast management of
a tibial fracture is contraindicated in the presence of acute
compartment syndrome. Fasciotomy should be performed prior to fracture
stabilization in order to eliminate any unnecessary delay in
decompression. Stabilization of the fracture allows easy access to the
soft tissues and protects the soft tissues, allowing them to heal.
Reamed intramedullary nailing of the tibia confers
excellent stabilization of a diaphyseal fracture and is now probably
the treatment of choice in most centers for tibial diaphyseal fracture.
Some authors, however, have implicated reaming as a possible cause of
acute compartment syndrome.74,100
This was refuted by other studies examining intercompartmental
pressures during and after tibial nailing. McQueen and coauthors
studying reamed intramedullary nailing,81 and Tornetta and French studying unreamed intramedullary nailing141
agreed that the ICP increased perioperatively and dissipated
postoperatively, and that nailing did not increase the likelihood of
acute compartment syndrome. Nassif and his coauthors found no
differences in ICP between reamed and unreamed nailing.111
Several factors may raise ICP during stabilization of
tibial fractures. These include traction, which raises pressure in the
deep posterior compartment by approximately 6% per kilogram of weight
applied.132 Counter-traction using a
thigh bar can cause external calf compression if the bar is wrongly
positioned and can also decrease arterial flow and venous return,
making the leg more vulnerable to ischemia. Elevation of the leg as in
the 90-90 position decreases the tolerance of the limb to ischemia.95
Thus excessive traction, poor positioning of the thigh bar and high
elevation of the leg should be avoided in patients at risk of acute
compartment syndrome.
Complications of acute compartment syndrome are unusual
if the condition has been treated expeditiously. Delay in diagnosis has
been cited as the single reason for failure in the management of acute
compartment syndrome.85 Delay to fasciotomy of more than 6 hours is likely to cause significant sequelae,124 including muscle contractures, muscle weakness, sensory loss, infection, and nonunion of fractures.* In severe cases amputation may be necessary because of infection or lack of function.31
Late Diagnosis
There is some debate about the place of decompression
when the diagnosis is made late and muscle necrosis is inevitable,
whether because of a missed acute compartment syndrome or the crush
syndrome. Little can be gained in exploring a closed


syndrome when complete muscle necrosis is inevitable, except in
circumstances where there are severe or potentially severe systemic
effects wherein amputation may be necessary. Increased sepsis rates
with potentially serious consequences have been reported when these
cases have been explored.119
Nonetheless, if partial muscle necrosis is suspected and compartment
monitoring reveals pressures above the threshold for decompression,
there may be an indication for fasciotomy to salvage remaining viable
muscle. In these circumstances debridement of necrotic muscle must be
thorough to reduce the chances of infection. In rare cases the ICP may
be high enough to occlude major vessels. This is a further indication
for fasciotomy to salvage the distal part of the limb.119

It is recommended that if there is no likelihood of any
surviving muscle and compartment pressures are low, then fasciotomy
should be withheld. If there is any possibility of any remaining viable
muscle or if compartment pressures are above critical levels,
fasciotomy should be performed to preserve any viable muscle. In any
circumstances a thorough débridement of necrotic muscle is mandatory.
Acute compartment syndrome remains a potentially
devastating complication of fracture that continues to be a significant
cause of disability and successful litigation.14
Delay to diagnosis was cited as the single cause of a poor outcome more
than 40 years ago, yet there remains a remarkable lack of consistency
in the methods used to diagnose the condition.152,156
Universally acceptable, clear, clinical guidelines are required to
improve speed of diagnosis in all units managing trauma and would
likely be the single biggest advance in the management of the condition.
Other future developments are likely to center on
methods of measuring blood flow directly rather than indirectly by ICP
measurement. Noninvasive methods of diagnosing acute compartment
syndrome are being examined.131 One
such example is near infrared spectroscopy, which measures the amount
of oxygenated hemoglobin in muscle tissues transcutaneously.5,52,64,136
Methods of reducing the effects of acute compartment
syndrome are also likely to play a part in the future. Some basic
science research has already been published on the effects of
antioxidants on the outcome of acute compartment syndrome with
promising results.70 This work
should be extended to human studies in an attempt to reduce the effects
of acute compartment syndrome in the clinical situation.
Prevention of acute compartment syndrome is the ultimate
goal in its management. Attempts have been made to reduce ICP with the
administration of hypertonic fluids intravenously,13
but these have never been successful clinically. Nevertheless, an
experiment on human subjects using tissue ultrafiltration to remove
fluid from the compartment has been shown to reduce ICP.113 Whether this technique can be useful clinically remains to be seen.
1. Adams
JG, Dhar A, Shukla SD, Silver D. Effect of pentoxifylline on tissue
injury and platelet-activating factor production during
ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:742-748.
2. Adkison
DP, Bosse MJ, Gaccione DR, Gabriel KR. Anatomical variations in the
course of the superficial peroneal nerve. J Bone Joint Surg
3. Al-Dadah
OQ, Darrah C, Cooper A, et al. Continuous compartment pressure
monitoring vs clinical monitoring in tibial diaphyseal fractures.
Injury 2008;39:1204-1209.
4. Almdahl
SM, Due J, Samdal FA. Compartment syndrome with muscle necrosis
following repair of hernia of tibialis anterior. Case report. Acta Chir
Scand 1987;153: 695-697.
5. Arbabi
S, Brundage SI, Gentilello LM. Near-infrared spectroscopy: a potential
method for continuous transcutaneous monitoring for compartmental
syndrome in critically injured patients. J Trauma 1999;47:829-833.
6. Ashton H. Critical closing pressure in human peripheral vascular beds. Clin Sci 1962; 22:79-87.
7. Ashton H. The effect of increased tissue pressure on blood flow. Clin Orthop 1975; 113:15-26.
8. Bae
DS, Kadiyala RK, Waters PM. Acute compartment syndrome in children:
contemporary diagnosis, treatment and outcome. J Paed Orthop
9. Bardenheuer L. Die Anlang und Behandlung der ischaemische Muskellahmungen und Kontrakturen. Samml Klin Vorträge 1911;122:437.
10. Belanger
M, Fadale P. Compartment syndrome of the leg after arthroscopic
examination of a tibial plateau fracture. Case report and review of the
literature. Arthroscopy 1997; 13:646-651.
11. Bernot
M, Gupta R, Dobrasz J, et al. The effect of antecedent ischemia on the
tolerance of skeletal muscle to increased interstitial pressure. J
Orthop Trauma 1996;10:555-559.
12. Berman
SS, Schilling JD, McIntyre KE, et al. Shoelace technique for delayed
primary closure of fasciotomies. Am J Surg 1994;169:435-436.
13. Better
OS, Zinman C, Reis DN, et al. Hypertonic mannitol ameliorates
intracompartmental tamponade in a model compartment syndrome in the
dog. Nephron 1991;58: 344-346.
14. Bhattacharyya T, Vrahas M. The medicolegal aspects of compartment syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004;86A:864-868.
15. Blaisdell
FW. The pathophysiology of skeletal muscle ischemia and the reperfusion
syndrome: a review. Cardiovasc Surg 2002;10:620-630.
16. Blick SS, Brumback PJ, Poka A, et al. Compartment syndrome in open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:1348-1353.
17. Bradley EL. The anterior tibial compartment syndrome. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 1973; 136:289-297.
18. Buhr AJ, Cooke AM. Fracture patterns. Lancet 1959;1:531-536.
19. Burton A. On the physical equilibrium of small blood vessels. J Biomechanics 1971; 4:155-158.

20. Chautems
RC, Irmay F, Magnin M, et al. Spontaneous anterior and lateral tibial
compartment syndrome in a Type 1 diabetic patient: Case report. J
Trauma 1997;43: 140-141.
21. Chan
PS, Steinberg DR, Pepe MD, Beredjiklian PK. The significance of the
three volar spaces in forearm compartment syndrome: a clinical and
cadaveric correlation. J Hand Surg (Am) 1998;23:1077-1081.
22. Cooper GG. A method of single incision four compartment fasciotomy of the leg. Eur J Vasc Surg 1992;6:659-661.
23. Court-Brown
CM, Byrnes T, McLaughlin G. Intramedullary nailing of tibial diaphyseal
fractures in children with open physes. Injury 2003;34:781-785.
24. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J. The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:417-421.
25. Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Compartment syndrome delays tibial union. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58:249-252.
26. Delee JC, Stiehl JB. Open tibia fracture with compartment syndrome. Clin Orthop 1981;160:175-184.
27. Diminick M, Shapiro G, Cornell C. Acute compartment syndrome of the triceps and deltoid. J Orthop Trauma 1999;13:225-227.
28, Dudgeon LS. Volkmann’s contracture. Lancet 1902;1:78-85.
29. Dunlop D, Parker PJ, Keating JF. Ruptured Baker’s cyst causing posterior compartment syndrome. Injury 1997;28:561-562.
30. Eaton RG, Green WT. Volkmann’s ischemia: a volar compartment syndrome of the forearm. Clin Orthop 1975;113:58-64.
31. Finkelstein JA, Hunter GA, Hu RW. Lower limb compartment syndrome: course after delayed fasciotomy. J Trauma 1996;40:342-344.
32. Finkemeier
CG, Schmidt AH, Kyle RF, et al. A prospective randomized study of
intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the
treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop
Trauma 2000;14:187-193.
33. Fitzgerald AM, Gaston P, Wilson Y, et al. Long-term sequelae of fasciotomy wounds. Br J Plast Surg 2000;53:690-693.
34. Foisie PS. Volkmann’s ischemic contracture. N Eng J Med 1942;226:671-679.
35. Frink
M, Kalus AK, Kuther G, et al. Long-term results of compartment syndrome
of the lower limb in polytraumatised patients. Injury 2007;38:607-613.
36. Garfin
SR, Mubarak SJ, Evans KL, et al. Quantification of intracompartmental
pressure and volume under plaster casts. J Bone Joint Surg (Am)
37. Gaspard DJ, Kohl RD. Compartmental syndromes in which skin is the limiting boundary. Clin Orthop 1975;113:65-68.
38. Gerber
A, Masquelet AC. Anatomy and intracompartmental pressure measurement
technique of the pronator quadratus compartment. J Hand Surg Am
2001;26: 1129-1134
39. Gelberman
RH. Upper extremity compartment syndromes. In: Mubarak SJ, Hargens AR,
eds. Compartment Syndromes and Volkmann’s Contracture. Philadelphia: WB
Saunders, 1981.
40. Gelberman
RH, Szabo RM, Williamson RV, et al. Tissue pressure threshold for
peripheral nerve viability. Clin Orthop 1983;178:285-291.
41. Gentilello
LM, Sanzone A, Wang L, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy versus
compartment pressure for the diagnosis of lower extremity compartmental
syndrome using electromyelography-determined measurements of
neuromuscular function. J Trauma 2001;51:1-8.
42. Gershuni
DH, Mubarak SJ, Yani NC, et al. Fracture of the tibia complicated by
acute compartment syndrome. Clin Orthop 1987;217:221-227.
43. Gibson
MJ, Barnes MR, Allen MJ, et al. Weakness of foot dorsiflexion and
changes in compartment pressures after tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint
Surg Br 1986;68:471-475.
44. Griffiths DL. Volkmann’s ischemic contracture. Br J Surg 1940; 28: 239-260.
45. Guyton
GP, Shearman CM, Saltzman CL. Compartmental divisions of the hand
revisited. Rethinking the validity of cadaver infusion experiments. J
Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:241-244.
46. Guyton
GP, Shearman CM, Saltzman CL. The compartments of the foot revisited.
Rethinking the validity of cadaver infusion experiments. J Bone Joint
Surg Br 2001; 83:245-249.
47. Halpern
AA, Nagel DA. Compartment syndrome of the forearm: early recognition
using tissue pressure measurement. J Hand Surg Am 1979;4:258-263.
48. Halpern AA, Nagel DA. Anterior compartment pressure in patients with tibial fracture. J Trauma 1980; 20:786-790.
49. Hargens
AR, Akeson WH, Mubarak SJ, et al. Fluid balance within the canine
anterolateral compartment and its relationship to compartment
syndromes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:499-505.
50. Hargens
AR, Akeson WH, Mubarak SJ, et al. Kappa Delta Award paper: tissue fluid
pressures: from basic research tools to clinical applications. J Orthop
Res 1989;7: 902-909.
51. Hargens
AR, Romine JS, Sipe JC, et al. Peripheral nerve conduction block by
high muscle compartment pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:192-200.
52. Harrington
P, Bunola J, Jennings AJ, et al. Acute compartment syndrome masked by
intravenous morphine from a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Injury
2000;31; 387-389.
53. Harris
IA, Kadir A, Donald G. Continuous compartment pressure monitoring for
tibia fractures: does it influence outcome? J Trauma 2006;60:1330-1335.
54. Hartsock
LA, O’Farrell D, Seaber AV, et al. Effect of increased compartment
pressure on the microcirculation of skeletal muscle. Microsurgery
55. Havig
MT, Leversedge FJ, Seiler JG. Forearm compartment pressures: an in
vitro analysis of open and endoscopic fasciotomy. J Hand Surg Am
56. Hayes
G, Liauw S, Romaschin AD, et al. Separation of reperfusion injury from
ischemia induced necrosis. Surg Forum 1988;39:306-308.
57. Heckman
MM, Whitesides TE, Greive SR, et al. Compartment pressure in
association with closed tibial fractures. The relationship between
tissue pressure, compartment and the distance from the site of the
fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:1285-1292.
58. Heckman
MM, Whitesides TE, Greve SR, et al. Histologic determination of the
ischemic threshold of muscle in the canine compartment syndrome model.
J Orth Trauma 1993; 7:199-210.
59. Henriksen
O. Orthostatic changes of blood flow in subcutaneous tissue in patients
with arterial insufficiency of the legs. Scand J Clin Lab Invest
60. Heppenstall
RB, Sapega AA, Scott R, et al. The compartment syndrome. An
experimental and clinical study of muscular energy metabolism using
phosphorus nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clin Orthop
61. Hildebrand O. Die Lehre von den ischämischen Muskellahmungen und Kontrakturen. Zeitschrift für Chirurgie 1906;108:44-201.
62. Holden CEA. The pathology and prevention of Volkmann’s ischemic contracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1979;61:296-300.
63. Hope MJ, McQueen MM. Acute compartment syndrome in the absence of fracture. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:220-224.
64. Hope
MJ, Simpson H, McQueen MM. Noninvasive acute compartment syndrome
monitoring. The influence of haematoma on near-infrared spectroscopy.
Proc AAOS 2003; 4:514.
65. Hsu SI, Thadhani RI, Daniels GH. Acute compartment syndrome in a hypothyroid patient. Thyroid 1995;5:305-308.
66. Janzing
H, Broos P. Dermotraction: an effective technique for the closure of
fasciotomy: a preliminary report of 15 patients. J Orthop Trauma
67. Janzing
HMJ, Broos PLO. Routine monitoring of compartment pressure in patients
with tibial fractures: beware of overtreatment! Injury 2001;32:415-421.
68. Jepson PN. Ischemic contracture: experimental study. Ann Surg 1926;84:785-795.
69. Karlstrom
G, Lonnerholm T, Olerud S. Cavus deformity of the foot after fracture
of the tibial shaft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:893-900.
70. Kearns
SR, Daly AF, Sheehan K, et al. Oral vitamin C reduces the injury to
skeletal muscle caused by compartment syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br
71. Kearns
SR, Moneley D, Murray P, et al. Oral vitamin C attenuates acute
ischemia-reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Br
72. Kelly RP, Whitesides TE. Transfibular route for fasciotomy of the leg. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967;49:1022-1023.
73. Kosir
R, Moore FA, Selby JH, et al. Acute lower extremity compartment
syndrome (ALECS) screening protocol in critically ill trauma patients.
J Trauma 2007;63: 268-275.
74. Koval
KJ, Clapper MF, Brumback RJ, et al. Complications of reamed
intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Orthop Trauma 1991;5:184-189.
75. Labbe
R, Lindsay T, Walker PM. The extent and distribution of skeletal muscle
necrosis after graded periods of complete ischemia. J Vasc Surg
76. Lam
R, Lin PH, Alankar S, et al. Acute limb ischemia secondary to
myositis-induced compartment syndrome in a patient with human
immunodeficiency virus infection. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:1103-1105.
77. Lindsay
TF, Liauw S, Rouraschin AD, et al. The effect of ischemia/reperfusion
on adenosine nucleotide metabolism and xanthine oxidase production in
skeletal muscle. J Vasc Surg 1990;12:8-15.
78. McDermott
AGP, Marble AE, Yabsley RH. Monitoring acute compartment pressures with
the STIC catheter. Clin Orthop 1984;190:192-198.
79. McKee
MD, Jupiter JB. Acute exercise-induced bilateral anterolateral leg
compartment syndrome in a healthy young man. Am J Orthop 1995;24:862-864
80. McQueen
MM. The effect of acute compartment syndrome on bone blood flow and
bone union. MD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1995.
81. McQueen
MM, Christie J, Court-Brown CM. Acute compartment syndrome in tibial
diaphyseal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:95-98.
82. McQueen
MM, Court-Brown CM. Compartment monitoring in tibial fractures. The
pressure threshold for decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Br
83. McQueen
MM, Christie J, Court-Brown CM. Compartment pressures after
intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:95-98.
84. McQueen MM, Gaston P, Court-Brown CM. Acute compartment syndrome: who is at risk? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82:200-203.
85. McQuillan WM, Nolan B. Ischemia complicating injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1968; 50:482-492.
86. Manoli
A, Weber TG. Fasciotomy of the foot: an anatomical study with special
reference to release of the calcaneal compartment. Foot Ankle
87. Mar
GJ, Barrington MJ, McGuirk BR. Acute compartment syndrome of the lower
limb and the effect of postoperative analgesia on diagnosis. Br J
Anaesth 2009;102:3-11.
88. Mars M, Hadley GP. Raised compartmental pressure in children: a basis for management. Injury 1998;29:183-185.
89. Matava
MS, Whitesides TE, Seiler JG, et al. Determination of the compartment
pressure threshold of muscle ischemia in a canine model. J Trauma
90. Mathews
PV, Perry JJ, Murray PC. Compartment syndrome of the well leg as a
result of the hemilithotomy position: a report of two cases and review
of literature. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:580-583.
91. Matsen FA. In: Compartmental Syndromes. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1980.
92. Matsen FA, Clawson DK. The deep posterior compartmental syndrome of the leg. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:34-39.
93. Matsen FA, King RV, Krugmire RB, et al. Physiological effects of increased tissue pressure. Int Orthop 1979;3:237-244
94. Matsen FA, Krugmire RB. Compartmental syndromes. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 1978; 147:943-949.
95. Matsen
FA, Mayo KA, Krugmire RB, et al. A model compartment syndrome in man
with particular reference to the quantification of nerve function. J
Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;59:648-653.
96. Matsen FA, Mayo KY, Sheridan GW, et al. Monitoring of intramuscular pressure. Surgery 1976;79:702-709.
97. Matsen FA, Winquist RA, Krugmire RB. Diagnosis and management of compartmental syndromes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:286-291.
98. Matsen
FA, Wyss CR, Krugmire RB, et al. The effect of limb elevation and
dependency on local arteriovenous gradients in normal human limbs with
particular reference to limbs with increased tissue pressure. Clin
Orthop 1980;150:187-195.
99. Mithoefer
K, Llhowe DW, Vrahas MS, et al. Functional outcome after acute
compartment syndrome of the thigh. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:729-737.
100. Moed
BR, Strom DE. Compartment syndrome after closed intramedullary nailing
of the tibia: a canine model and report of two cases. J Orthop Trauma
101. Moed
BR, Thorderson PK. Measurement of ICP: a comparison of the slit
catheter, sideported needle, and simple needle. J Bone Joint Surg Am
102. Mubarak
SJ, Hargens AR, Owen CA, et al. The wick catheter technique for
measurement of intramuscular pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Am
103. Mubarak
SJ, Owen CA. Double incision fasciotomy of the leg for decompression in
compartment syndromes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:184-187.

104. Mubarak
SJ, Owen CA, Hargens AR, et al. Acute compartment syndromes: diagnosis
and treatment with the aid of the wick catheter. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1978;60: 1091-1095.
105. Mubarak SJ, Wilton NCT. Compartment syndromes and epidural analgesia. J Paed Orthop 1997;17:282-284.
106. Mullett
H, Al-Abed K, Prasad C, et al. Outcome of compartment syndrome
following intramedullary nailing of tibial diaphyseal fractures. Injury
107. Murphy JB. Myositis. JAMA 1914;63(15):1249-1255.
108. Myerson MS. Management of compartment syndromes of the foot. Clin Orthop 1991; 271:239-248.
109. Myerson M, Manoli A. Compartment syndromes of the foot after calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop 1993;290:142-150.
110. Nario CV. La enfermedad de Volkman experimental. Ann Fac Med Montivideo 1938; 10:87-128.
111. Nassif
JM, Gorczyca JT, Cole JK, et al. Effect of acute reamed versus unreamed
intramedullary nailing on compartment pressure when treating closed
tibial shaft fractures: a randomized prospective study. J Orthop Trauma
112. Nichol
J, Girling F, Jerrard W, et al. Fundamental instability of the small
blood vessels and critical closing pressures in vascular beds. Am J
Physiol 1951;164:330-344.
113. Odland
R, Schmidt AH, Hunter B, et al. Use of tissue ultrafiltration for
treatment of compartment syndrome: a pilot study using porcine
hindlimbs. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19:267-275.
114. Ovre
S, Hvaal K, Holm I, et al. Compartment pressure in nailed tibial
fractures. A threshold of 30 mm Hg for decompression gives 29%
fasciotomies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;118:29-31.
115. Peterson F. Über ischämische Muskellahmung. Arch Klin Chir 1888;37:675-677.
116. Petrasek PF, Homer-Vanmasinkam S, Walker PM. Determinants of ischemic injury to skeletal muscle. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:623-631.
117. Prasarn
ML, Ouellette EA, Livingstone A, et al. Acute pediatric upper extremity
compartment syndrome in the absence of fracture. J Pediatr Orthop
118. Pyne D, Jawad ASM, Padhiar N. Saphenous nerve injury after fasciotomy for compartment syndrome. Br J Sports Med 2003;37:541-542.
119. Reis ND, Michaelson M. Crush injury to the lower limbs. Treatment of the local injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:414-418.
120. Report
by the British Orthopaedic Association/British Association of Plastic
Surgeons working party on the management of open tibial fractures. Br J
Plast Surg 1997;50: 570-583.
121. Roddie
IC, Shepherd JT. Evidence for critical closure of digital resistance
vessels with reduced transmural pressure and passive vasodilation with
increased venous pressure. J Physiol 1957;136:498-506.
122. Rorabeck CH. The treatment of compartment syndromes of the leg. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984;66:93-97.
123. Rorabeck
CH, Castle GSP, Hardie R, et al. Compartmental pressure measurements:
an experimental investigation using the slit catheter. J Trauma
124. Rorabeck
CH, Macnab L. Anterior tibial compartment syndrome complicating
fractures of the shaft of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am
125. Rowlands RP. A case of Volkmann’s contracture treated by shortening the radius and ulna. Lancet 1905;2:1168-1171.
126. Sanders R. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:225-250.
127. Schwartz
JT, Brumback RJ, Lakatos R, et al. Acute compartment syndrome of the
thigh: a spectrum of injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:392-400.
128. Seddon HJ. Volkmann’s ischemia in the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1966;48: 627-636.
129. Seiler
JG, Valadie AL, Frederick RW, et al. Perioperative compartment
syndrome. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:600-602.
130. Shabat
S, Carmel A, Cohen Y, et al. Iatrogenic forearm compartment syndrome in
a cardiac intensive care unit induced by brachial artery puncture and
acute anticoagulation. J Interv Cardiol 2002;15:107-109.
131. Shadgan
B, Menon M, O’Brien P, et al. Diagnostic techniques in acute
compartment syndrome of the leg. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:581-587.
132. Shakespeare DT, Henderson NJ. Compartmental pressure changes during calcaneal traction in tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br1982;64:498-499.
133. Shakespeare
DT, Henderson NJ, Clough G. The slit catheter: a comparison with the
wick catheter in the measurement of compartment pressure. Injury
134. Sheridan
GW, Matsen FA, Krugmire RB. Further investigations on the
pathophysiology of the compartmental syndrome. Clin Orthop
135. Shereff MJ. Compartment syndromes of the foot. Instr Course Lect 1990;39:127-132.
136. Shuler
MS, Reisman WM, Whitesides TE Jr, et al. Near infrared spectroscopy in
lower extremity trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1360-1368.
137. Stott
NS, Zionts LE, Holtom PD, et al. Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis. An
unusual case of compartment syndrome in a child. Clin Orthop
138. Styf
JR, Crenshaw A, Hargens AR. Intramuscular pressures during exercise.
Comparison of measurements with and without infusion. Acta Orthop Scand
139. Sweeney
HE, O’Brien F. Bilateral anterior tibial compartment syndrome in
association with the nephritic syndrome; report of a case. Arch Intern
Med 1965;116:487-488.
140. Tarlow
SD, Achterman CA, Hayhurst J, et al. Acute compartment syndrome in the
thigh complicating fracture of the femur. A report of three cases. J
Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:1439-1443.
141. Tornetta P, French BG. Compartment pressures during nonreamed tibial nailing without traction. J Orthop Trauma 1997;11:24-27.
142. Turen
CH, Burgess AR, Vanco B. Skeletal stabilization for tibial fractures
associated with acute compartment syndrome. Clin Orthop
143. Ulmer
T. The clinical diagnosis of compartment syndrome of the lower leg: are
clinical findings predictive of the disorder? J Orthop Trauma
144. Veeragandham
RS, Paz IB, Nadeemanee A. Compartment syndrome of the leg secondary to
leukemic infiltration: a case report and review of the literature. J
Surg Oncol 1994;55:198-200.
145. Vigasio A, Battiston B, De Filippo G, et al. Compartmental syndrome due to viper bite. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1991;110:175-177.
146. Vitale
GC, Richardson JD, George SM, et al. Fasciotomy for severe blunt and
penetrating trauma of the extremity. Surg Gynaecol Obstet
147. Vollmar
B, Westermann S, Menzer M. Microvascular response to compartment
syndrome-like external pressure elevation: an in vivo fluorescence
microscopic study in the hamster striated muscle. J Trauma
148. Von Volkmann R. Die ischämischen Muskellahmungen und Kontrakturen. Centrabl f Chir 1881;51-801.
149. Walker PM, Lindsay TF, Labbe R, et al. Salvage of skeletal muscle with free radical scavengers. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:68-75.
150. Wallis
FC. Treatment of paralysis and muscular atrophy after the prolonged use
of splints or of an Esmarch’s cord. The Practitioner 1907;67:429-436.
151. Webb LX. New techniques in wound management: vacuum-assisted wound closure. J Am Acad Orth Surg 2002;10:303-311.
152. Wall
CJ, Richardson MD, Lowe AJ, et al. Survey of management of acute
traumatic compartment syndrome of the leg in Australia. ANZ J Surg
153. Whitesides
TE, Haney TC, Morimoto K, et al. Tissue pressure measurements as a
determinant for the need of fasciotomy. Clin Orthop 1975;113:43-51.
154. White
TO, Howell GED, Will EM, et al. Elevated intramuscular compartment
pressures do not influence outcome after tibial fracture. J Trauma
155. Williams J, Gibbons M, Trindle H, et al. Complications of nailing in closed tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1995;9:476-481.
156. Williams
PR, Russell ID, Mintowt-Czyz WJ. Compartment pressure
monitoring—current UK orthopaedic practice. Injury 1998;29:229-232.
157. Willis RB, Rorabeck CH. Treatment of compartment syndrome in children. Orthop Clin N Am 1990;21:401-412.
158. Willy
C, Gerngross H, Sterk J. Measurement of intracompartmental pressure
with use of a new electronic transducer-tipped catheter system. J Bone
Joint Surg Am 1999;81: 158-168.
159. Wright JG, Bogoch ER, Hastings DE. The “occult” compartment syndrome. J Trauma 1989;29:133-134.
160. Yamada S. Effects of positive tissue pressure on blood flow of the finger. J Appl Physiol 1954;6:495-500.
161. Younger
ASE, Curran P, McQueen MM. Backslabs and plaster casts: which will best
accommodate increasing intracompartmental pressures? Injury

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More