Biomalleolar Ankle Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation



Ovid: Atlas of Orthopaedic Surgery: A Multimedia Reference

Editors: Koval, Kenneth J.; Zuckerman, Joseph D.
Title: Atlas of Orthopaedic Surgery: A Multimedia Reference, 1st Edition
> Table of Contents > Section
VII – Foot and Ankle > Chapter 33 – Biomalleolar Ankle Fractures:
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Chapter 33
Biomalleolar Ankle Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation
Kenneth J. Koval
The ankle is a weight-bearing joint with minimal
tolerance for variation from normal anatomy if good joint function is
to be maintained. A congruent joint with reestablishment of normal
ankle mortise relationships is necessary to prevent the long-term
sequelae of painful, posttraumatic arthritis. Anatomic, stable
reduction should be the goal in treatment of these intraarticular
fractures. This chapter describes the operative treatment of
bimalleolar ankle fractures.
ANATOMY
The ankle joint is a modified hinge joint consisting of the tibia, fibula, and talus (Fig. 33-1).
The articular surface of the distal tibia is concave and broader
anteriorly than posteriorly. The roof of the ankle joint (i.e.,
plafond) is continuous medially with the medial malleolus, which
projects below the plafond and articulates with the medial surface of
the talus. The distal aspect of the medial malleolus is divided into
two prominences, the anterior and the posterior colliculi. The lateral
malleolus projects about 1 cm distal and posterior to the medial
malleolus. The talus is covered largely by cartilage; its body is wider
anteriorly than posteriorly and is matched to the distal tibial
articular surface.
FIGURE 33-1. A: Medial view of the ligaments of the ankle. B: Lateral view of the ligaments of the ankle. C: Disarticulated talus. (From Agur AMR, Lee MJ. Grant’s atlas of anatomy, 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999, with permission.)
Uniting these osseous structures are the medial and the
lateral collateral ligaments and the ligaments of the tibiofibular
syndesmosis. The deltoid ligament (i.e., medial collateral ligament) is
a thick, triangular band consisting of superficial and deep fibers. The
superficial fibers arise largely from the anterior colliculus of the
medial malleolus and run as a continuous sheet in the sagittal plane to
attach to the navicular, the sustentaculum tali, and the talus. The
intraarticular and more horizontal deep fibers run from the
intercollicular notch and posterior colliculus to the medial surface of
the talus.

P.354
FIGURE 33-1. Continued.

P.355
FIGURE 33-2. A: The anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates an isolated fibula fracture. B:
A stress view, taken with external rotation of the foot with the ankle
in dorsiflexion, documents medial clear space widening and talar shift.
The lateral side of the ankle has three ligaments that
constitute the lateral collateral ligament: the anterior talofibular
ligament, which runs from the anterior margin of the lateral malleolus
to the anterior lateral facet of the talus; the calcaneofibular
ligament, which extends down and posteriorly from the tip of the fibula
to a tubercle on the lateral aspect of the calcaneus; and the posterior
talofibular ligament, which originates on the medial surface of the
lateral malleolus and inserts on the posterolateral aspect of the talus.
The most distal portions of the tibia and the fibula are
joined together by four ligaments and the interosseous membrane. The
ligaments are the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, the
posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, the inferior transverse
ligament, and the posterior talofibular ligament. These ligaments
stabilize the distal articulation of the tibia and fibula.
INDICATIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS
The goal of treatment is to restore the ankle joint.
Nonoperative treatment is reserved for nondisplaced, stable fracture
patterns with an intact syndesmosis and for patients with marked
osteoporosis, arterial insufficiency, limited goals for ambulation, or
short life expectancy. Although it is possible to gain a satisfactory
or even anatomic reduction of a displaced malleolar fracture by closed
reduction, maintaining this reduction generally requires immobilization
in a nonfunctional position in a long leg cast for at least 6 weeks. It
is important to identify and separate patients with isolated fibular
fractures from those who have obvious or occult injury to the medial
side of the ankle. For patients with an isolated fibula fracture and
medial pain but no talar shift, stress radiographs should be taken. If
medial clear-space widening (>4 mm) with talar shift is present on
stress radiographs (taken with external rotation of the foot with the
ankle in dorsiflexion), the fibular fracture should be stabilized
(Fig. 33-2).
CLASSIFICATION
There are several classifications for ankle fractures in clinical use. The Lauge-Hansen classification has four patterns,

P.356

based on the position of the foot at the time of injury and the force direction (Fig. 33-3).

Supination-adduction accounts for 10% to 20% of malleolar fractures and is the only type associated with medial displacement of the talus:
Stage I produces a transverse avulsion-type fracture of
the fibula distal to the level of the joint or a rupture of the lateral
collateral ligaments.
Stage II results in a vertically oriented medial malleolus fracture.
Supination-external rotation accounts for 40% to 75% of malleolar fractures:
Stage I produces disruption of the anterior tibiofibular
ligament with or without an associated avulsion fracture at its tibial
or fibular attachment.
Stage II results in the typical spiral fracture of the distal fibula, which runs from anteroinferior to posterosuperior aspects.
Stage III produces a disruption of the posterior tibiofibular ligament or a fracture of the posterior malleolus.
Stage IV produces a transverse avulsion-type fracture of the medial malleolus or a rupture of the deltoid ligament.
Pronation-abduction accounts for 5% to 20% of malleolar fractures:
Stage I results in a transverse fracture of the medial malleolus or a rupture of the deltoid ligament.
Stage II produces a rupture of the syndesmotic ligaments or an avulsion fracture at their insertion sites.
Stage III produces a transverse or short oblique
fracture of the distal fibula at or above the level of the syndesmosis;
this results from a bending force that causes medial tension and
lateral compression of the fibula, producing lateral comminution or a
butterfly fragment.
Pronation-external rotation accounts for 5% to 20% of malleolus fractures:
Stage I produces a transverse fracture of the medial malleolus or a rupture of the deltoid ligament.
FIGURE 33-3.
The Lauge-Hansen classification for ankle fractures is based on the
position of the foot at the time of injury and the force direction. SA,
supination-adduction; SER, supination-external rotation; PA,
pronation-abduction; PER, pronation-external rotation. (From Carr JP,
Trafton PG: Malleolar fractures and soft tissue injuries of the ankle.
In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, eds. Skeletal trauma, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998, with permission.)
FIGURE 33-4.
The Danis-Weber classification is based on the level of the fibular
fracture. (From Carr JP, Trafton PG. Malleolar fractures and soft
tissue injuries of the ankle. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM,
eds. Skeletal trauma, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998, with permission.)
Stage II results in disruption of the anterior tibiofibular ligament with or without avulsion fracture at its insertion sites.
Stage III results in a spiral fracture of the distal
fibula at or above the level of the syndesmosis running from
anterosuperior to posteroinferior.
Stage IV produces a rupture of the posterior tibiofibular ligament or an avulsion fracture of the posterolateral tibia.
The Danis-Weber classification is based on the level of
the fibular fracture; the more proximal the fracture, the greater is
the risk of syndesmotic disruption and associated instability (Fig. 33-4):
Type A involves a fracture of the fibula below the level
of the tibial plafond, an avulsion injury that results from supination
of the foot and that may be associated with an oblique or vertical
fracture of the medial malleolus.
Type B is an oblique or spiral fracture of the fibula
caused by external rotation occurring at or near the level of the
syndesmosis.
Type C involves a fracture of the fibula above the level
of the syndesmosis, causing disruption of the syndesmosis, and is
almost always with associated medial injury.
The Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification
of ankle fractures is based primarily on fracture level in relation to
syndesmosis (Fig. 33-5):

Type A is an infrasyndesmotic lesion.

A1:

infrasyndesmotic lateral malleolus, isolated

A2:

infrasyndesmotic lateral malleolus with associated medial malleolar fracture

A3:

infrasyndesmotic lateral malleolus with associated posteromedial tibial fracture

Type B is a transsyndesmotic lesion.

B1:

transsyndesmotic lateral malleolus, isolated

B2:

transsyndesmotic lateral malleolus with associated medial lesion

B3:

transsyndesmotic lateral malleolus with medial lesion and fracture of the posterolateral rim of the tibia

Type C is a suprasyndesmotic lesion.

C1:

simple diaphyseal fibular fracture

C2:

complex (multifragment) diaphyseal fibular fracture with associated medial injury

C3:

proximal fibular fracture with associated medial injury

P.357
FIGURE 33-5.
The Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification of ankle
fractures is based on the fracture level in relation to the
syndesmosis. (From Marsh JL, Saltzman CL. Ankle fractures. In: Heckman
JD, Bucholz RW, eds. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, with permission.)
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
Initial radiographs for evaluation of an ankle fracture
should include anteroposterior, mortise, and lateral views of the ankle
(Fig. 33-6). The surgeon should also ascertain that there is not a proximal fibula fracture by clinical or radiographic examination.
FIGURE 33-6. Anteroposterior (A), mortise (B), and lateral (C) views of the ankle demonstrate a displaced bimalleolar ankle fracture.
Use the anteroposterior view to assess certain features:
  • Tibiofibular overlap of less than 10 mm is abnormal and implies syndesmotic injury.
  • Tibiofibular clear space of more than 5 mm is abnormal and implies syndesmotic injury.
  • In a talar tilt, a difference in width of
    the medial and lateral aspects of the superior joint space of more than
    2 mm is abnormal and indicates medial or lateral disruption.
The lateral view allows evaluation of alignment and some fractures:
  • The dome of the talus should be centered under the tibia and congruous with the tibial plafond.
  • Posterior tibial tuberosity fractures can be identified, as well as the direction of fibular injury.
  • Avulsion fractures of the talus by the anterior capsule may be identified.
The mortise view, taken with the foot in 15 to 20
degrees of internal rotation to offset the intermalleolar axis, is used
to ascertain talar positioning:
  • A medial clear space of more than 4 mm is abnormal and indicates lateral talar shift.
  • In assessing talar tilt, a line drawn
    parallel to the distal tibial articular surface and a second line drawn
    parallel to the talar surface should be parallel. More than 2 degrees
    of angulation indicates talar tilt.
  • In assessing the talocrural angle, the angle subtended between the intermalleolar line and a line parallel to the distal

    P.358

    tibial articular surface should be between 8 and 15 degrees. A smaller angle indicates fibular shortening.

  • Tibiofibular overlap of less than 1 cm indicates syndesmotic disruption.
  • A talar shift of more than 1 mm is abnormal.
Computed tomography is useful in the evaluation of
complex or comminuted fractures, especially of the distal tibia when
plain radiographs are not able to fully delineate the fracture extent
or in adolescents to demonstrate a possible triplane fracture.
EQUIPMENT
Some basic instruments are necessary for open reduction and internal fixation of the ankle (Fig. 33-7):
  • Small fragment plate and screws
  • Pelvic instrument and implant sets
  • Kirschner wires (K-wires)
  • Small-diameter, cannulated screws
  • Large and small, pointed reduction clamps
  • Cerclage wire set
SURGERY
Patient Positioning for Fracture Reduction
The patient is positioned supine, with a pad beneath the
buttock on the injured side to aid access to the fibula. All pressure
points are padded. A pneumatic tourniquet is applied to the upper thigh
for use during surgery. The leg is prepared and draped free.
FIGURE 33-7. A: The basic instruments necessary for open reduction and internal fixation of the ankle include a cerclage wire set (top left tray); small fragment plate and screw set (top right tray); large and small, pointed reduction clamps (2) (bottom left); drill bits, taps, Kirschner wires, and bending templates (bottom tray, middle); and drill guides, screw driver, retractors, and reduction forceps (bottom right tray). B: Small fragment plate and screw set.
Lateral Malleolus
Approach
The fibula is approached through a straight lateral
incision centered over the fracture and curving anterior distally to
allow access to the anterolateral corner of the ankle joint (Fig. 33-8).
The placement of this incision, however, may be adjusted, based on soft
tissue conditions such as the presence of blisters or abrasions (Fig. 33-9). The deeper tissue is dissected in line with the skin incision, taking care not to injure the superficial peroneal nerve. Division or entrapment of fixation devices the peroneal nerve in scar can lead to a symptomatic neuroma.
Dissection is carried to the lateral border of the
fibula, and the periosteum is incised over the lateral and posterior
aspect of the fibula (Fig. 33-10). The full
extent of the usual posterior fracture spike is exposed to allow proper
fracture reduction assessment. Soft tissue stripping of butterfly
fragments is kept to a minimum, particularly if there is comminution.
Exposure must be sufficient to allow placement of reduction forceps,
evaluation of the fracture reduction, and insertion of plate and screws.
Procedure
After fracture exposure, the fracture is mobilized and irrigated, and clot is removed from between the fracture edges (Fig. 33-11). With
the usual supination-external rotation injury, external rotation of the
foot opens the fracture surfaces and allows full exposure of the
internal and external aspects of the fibula for irrigation and clot
removal.
Fracture
reduction can be accomplished by the use of clamps without strenuous
manual traction. A small reduction (lion jaws) clamp from the small
fragment set is placed obliquely across the fibula, perpendicular to
the fracture

P.359

plane (Fig. 33-12); this clamp is then used to obtain fracture length and rotation. image A second clamp can be placed proximal or distal to the first clamp and used to fine tune the fracture reduction. The
surgeon should avoid placing the reduction clamp around the thin
portion of the anterior or posterior fracture spikes to minimize the
risk of iatrogenic fracture comminution.
If
there is significant fracture comminution or poor bone quality, the
surgeon can manually reduce the fracture and place provisional fixation
with two or three 1.6-mm K-wires inserted from the tip of the fibula
across the fracture.

FIGURE 33-8.
The fibula is approached through a straight lateral incision centered
over the fracture and curving anteriorly distally to allow access to
the anterolateral corner of the ankle joint.
FIGURE 33-9. Modification of the lateral skin incision because of an anterolateral blister.
FIGURE 33-10. A and B:
The dissection is carried to the lateral border of the fibula, and the
periosteum is incised over the lateral and posterior aspects of the
fibula.
FIGURE 33-11. Removal of a clot from between the fracture edges.

P.360
FIGURE 33-12. A and B:
A small reduction (lion jaws) clamp from the small fragment set is
placed obliquely across the fibula, perpendicular to the fracture
plane, to reduce the fracture.
After fracture reduction, one or two lag screws are placed across the fracture fragments from anterior to posterior aspects (Fig. 33-13). A gliding hole is made in the near cortex using a 3.5-mm drill. image A 3.5/2.5 mushroom cap is then used to make a hole in the far cortex using a 2.5-mm drill.image After measurement of the screw length and tapping of the screw tract, the lag screw is inserted. The surgeon must angle the drill bit laterally to capture the distal fragment.
A one-third tubular plate is then contoured, placed laterally or
posterolaterally, and secured to the proximal and distal fragments (Fig. 33-14). The plate must be contoured

P.361

with a bend and a twist (Fig. 33-15). image The
plate is bent so that it is concave just above the plafond level and
gently convex over the larger lateral malleolus itself. image
This contouring is particularly important if fracture comminution
precludes use of a lag screw, because fracture reduction can be altered
by poor plate bending.
I usually insert
the distal screw first and then verify that the proximal aspect of the
plate is centered on the fibula. After placement of a second screw, the
plate position is fixed, and the plate cannot be rotated to a better
position on the bone.
With lateral plate placement, the distal
screws must remain unicortical to avoid intraarticular protrusion; the
proximal screws are bicortical.

FIGURE 33-13. A:
A lag screw is placed from anterior to posterior across the fracture
fragments. A gliding hole is made in the near cortex using a 3.5-mm
drill. B and C: A 3.5/2.5 mushroom cap is then used to make a hole in the far cortex using a 2.5-mm drill. D and E: After measurement of the screw length and tapping of the screw tract, the lag screw is inserted. F and G: Fluoroscopic evaluation after lag screw insertion.

P.362
FIGURE 33-14. A to C:
Lateral plate placement with screw insertion proximally and distally.
The most distal screw is usually inserted first and angled proximally. D and E: Fluoroscopic evaluation after plate insertion.
Medial Malleolus
Approach
The medial incision is slightly curved and centered over the medial malleolus (Fig. 33-16).
It is sufficiently long to allow fracture reduction and stabilization
without excessive soft tissue retraction. The saphenous vein and its
accompanying saphenous nerve branches are preserved. The medial border

P.363

of the medial malleolus is dissected of soft tissue and the fracture identified (Fig. 33-17). image
The periosteum on either side of the fracture should be cleared for 2
to 3 mm to allow assessment of fracture reduction. The anteromedial
corner of the ankle joint is visualized and irrigated to determine the
extent of cartilage injury and remove any osteocartilaginous debris (Fig. 33-18).

FIGURE 33-15.
The plate is contoured with a bend and a twist. The plate is bent so
that it is concave just above the plafond level and gently convex over
the larger lateral malleolus.
FIGURE 33-16. The medial incision is slightly curved and centered over the medial malleolus.

P.364
FIGURE 33-17. A and B: Soft tissues is dissected off the medial border of the medial malleolus, and the fracture is identified. C: The periosteum is incised on either side of the fracture.

P.365
FIGURE 33-18. Visualization of the anteromedial corner of the ankle joint.
Procedure
The medial malleolus can be manually reduced using a dental pick or small, pointed reduction forceps image and provisionally stabilized using K-wires or reduction forceps (Fig. 33-19). image
Once satisfied with the fracture reduction visually and
radiographically, two 4.0-mm, partially threaded, cannulated cancellous
screws are inserted perpendicular to the fracture (Fig. 33-20).
For most fractures, these are placed halfway between medial cortex and
articular cartilage and angled proximally and laterally from the tip of
the malleolus to remain entirely within the malleolus and the distal
tibial metaphysis. Generally, 35- or 40-mm screw lengths are
sufficient, although this depends on the patient’s size and the
fracture pattern. It is better to stay within
the dense bone of the more distal tibial metaphysis, especially in
osteoporotic patients, than to use longer screws.
FIGURE 33-19. A: Reduction of the medial malleolus using a dental pick.
Small medial malleolar fractures may be fixed with one
screw, typically in the larger anterior colliculus, with a parallel
K-wire in the posterior colliculus to prevent rotation. Bending the K-wire so its tip lies on the screw head aids hardware removal and minimizes the prominence.
Comminuted fragments may be stabilized with K-wires and a supplementary
“tension-band” suture or wire anchored around a proximal screw and
washer (Fig. 33-21).
Syndesmosis Fixation
After
medial and lateral malleolar reduction and stabilization, the surgeon
should assess the status of the syndesmosis. Syndesmotic instability
can be assessed by pulling laterally with an instrument hooked around
the distal fibula or manually displacing the talus laterally with
external rotation (Fig. 33-22). image
Displacement of more than a few millimeters, especially if there is
failure or elastic recoil to the anatomic position, is an indication of
soft tissue disruption and the need for syndesmotic screw fixation.
The syndesmosis is reduced with the foot in dorsiflexion to prevent narrowing of the mortise because of the trapezoidal

P.366

shape of the talus. A large tenaculum clamp placed across the distal
tibia and fibula can be used to provisionally stabilize the syndesmosis
(Fig. 33-23). After provisional fixation, radiographic confirmation of mortise alignment is obtained.

FIGURE 33-19. Continued. B and C:
Provisional stabilization of the fracture using two Kirschner wires. If
these wires are in a good position, they can be used for insertion of a
cannulated lag screw.

P.367
FIGURE 33-20. A and B: Fluoroscopic evaluation of the fracture reduction and Kirschner wire position. C and D: Insertion of two 4.0-mm, partially threaded, cannulated cancellous screws.
FIGURE 33-21.
A small medial malleolar fragment is stabilized with Kirschner wires
and a supplementary “tension-band” suture anchored around a proximal
screw and washer.
FIGURE 33-22. Assessment of syndesmotic stability by pulling laterally with a reduction clamp placed around the distal fibula.

P.368
FIGURE 33-23. Reduction of a widened syndesmosis (A) using a tenaculum clamp placed across the distal fibula and tibia with the ankle in dorsiflexion (B).
The size of the syndesmotic screw and the number of
cortices of fixation remain controversial. However, I generally
stabilize the syndesmosis using a fully threaded, 3.5-mm cortical screw
placed through three or four cortices (Fig. 33-24). The
advantage of placing the syndesmotic screw through four cortices is
that, if the screw breaks, the tibial portion can be removed through a
medial incision.
This screw is inserted parallel to the ankle
joint, from the posterolateral fibula to the anteromedial tibia, 1.5 to
2.0 cm above the plafond. If a plate was used for fibular fixation, it
is often possible to place this screw through one of its holes.
protruding a couple of millimeters on the medial side.
FIGURE 33-24. A to C: Stabilization of the syndesmosis using a fully threaded, 3.5-mm cortical screw placed through three cortices.

P.369
Posterior Malleolus
Small posterior malleolar fragments usually reduce with
anatomic fibula reduction. Dorsiflexion of the foot may assist in
reduction by a ligamentotaxis effect from the posterior capsule. If the
fragment is large and involves more than 25% of the articular surface
of the distal tibia, I favor fixation, particularly if associated with
posterior talar subluxation or dislocation. The posterior malleolus may
be stabilized using lag screws inserted in a posterior-to-anterior or
anterior-to-posterior direction.
FIGURE 33-25.
Exposure of the posterior malleolus can be performed from a
posterolateral approach. The skin incision is placed posterior to the
fibula (A). The approach uses the interval between the peroneal tendons and the flexor hallucis longus muscle (B and C) to expose the distal aspect of the posterior tibia (D and E).
If the posterior malleolar fragment is large and
requires direct reduction, exposure of this fragment and of the lateral
malleolus can be performed from a posterolateral approach. The skin
incision is placed posterior to the fibula. The fibula is reduced
first. The approach then uses the interval between the peroneal tendons
and the flexor hallucis longus muscle to expose the distal aspect of
the posterior tibia (Fig. 33-25). The external
edges of the fracture are used as a guide to anatomic reduction and the
posterior malleolus fracture stabilized with one or two cancellous
screws directed from a posterior to an anterior direction (Fig. 33-26).

P.370
FIGURE 33-26. A and B: Stabilization of the posterior malleolus using two cancellous screws directed from posterior to anterior aspects.
FIGURE 33-27. Final intraoperative anteroposterior (A), mortise (B), and lateral (C) radiographs.

P.371
WOUND CLOSURE
Before wound closure, the ankle is placed through a
range of motion to assess fixation stability. Intraoperative
radiographs are also taken to ensure that reduction and fixation are
adequate (Fig. 33-27). I obtain anteroposterior, mortise, and lateral views.
The fascia is left open proximally over calf-muscle
compartments but may be closed distally over the malleoli. The
subcutaneous tissue is reapproximated using Vicryl sutures. The skin is
closed with nylon using vertical mattress sutures to evert the wound
edges. Tight closure should be avoided because of the tendency for the leg to swell in the early postoperative period. If
the wound is too swollen to close without excessive tension, the wound
should be left open and a delayed wound closure performed.
A bulky dressing is applied with a posterior and U-shaped splints holding the ankle in a neutral position.
POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Patients are instructed to keep the leg elevated as much
as possible for the first week after surgery. They are instructed in
ambulation training while not bearing weight on the injured extremity.
At the first postoperative office visit, the leg is placed in a
removable functional brace, and the patient is instructed on active and
passive range-of-motion exercises of the ankle and subtalar joint. The
brace is removed several times each day for active range-of-motion
exercises. As the patient becomes more comfortable, gentle but
progressive passive dorsiflexion stretching is added.
Weight bearing is allowed at 6 weeks, except for
individuals in whom a syndesmosis screw had been used. These patients
do not bear weight on the affected site for 8 weeks, at which time the
screw is removed. Postoperative radiographs are obtained at 2 and 6
weeks. After the patient is allowed to bear weight as tolerated,
resistive exercises are initiated.
SUGGESTED READINGS
Beauchamp CG, Clay NR, Tehxton PW. Displaced ankle fractures in patients over 50 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65: 329-332.
Boden SD, Labropoulos PA, McCowin P, et al. Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:1548-1555.
Carr JB, Hansen ST, Benirschke SK. Surgical treatment of foot and ankle trauma: use of indirect reduction techniques. Foot Ankle 1989;9:176-178.
Cimino W, Ichtertz D, Slabaugh P. Early mobilization of ankle fractures after open reduction and internal fixation. Clin Orthop 1991;267:152-156.
Ferries JS, DeCoster TA, Firoozbakhsh KK, et al. Plain radiographic interpretation in trimalleolar ankle fractures poorly assesses posterior fragment size. J Orthop Trauma 1994;8:328-331.
Finsen V, Saetermo R, Kibsgaard L, et al. Early postoperative weight-bearing and muscle activity in patients who have a fracture of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:23-27.
Kristensen KD, Hansen T. Closed treatment of ankle fractures: stage ii supination-eversion fractures followed for 20 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:107-109.
Lindsjö U. Classification of ankle fractures: the Lauge-Hansen or AO system? Clin Orthop 1985;199:12-16.
Mast J, Jakob R, Ganz R. Planning and reduction techniques in fracture surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989.
Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, et al. Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO group, 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
Pankovich A. Fractures of the fibula proximal to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:221-229.
Pankovich A. Fractures of the fibula at the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Clin Orthop 1979;143:138-147.
Pankovich AM. Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:337-342.
Pankovich AM, Shivaram MS. Anatomic basis of variability in injuries of the medial malleolus and the deltoid ligament. II. Clinical studies. Acta Orthop Scand 1979;50:225-236.
Pankovich AM, Shivaram MS. Anatomical basis of variability in injuries of the medial malleolus and the deltoid ligament. I. Anatomic studies. Acta Orthop Scand 1979;50:217-223.
Schaffer JJ, Manoli A. The antiglide plate for distal fibular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:596-604.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More