Fracture, Scaphoid
Fracture, Scaphoid
Brent R. Becker
Keith A. Stuessi
Basics
-
Most commonly fractured of the 8 carpal bones of the hand
-
Usual mechanism of injury is a fall onto an outstretched hand
-
Scaphoid fractures, particularly fractures of the proximal pole, have an increased risk of nonunion.
-
Synonym: Fracture, carpal navicular
Epidemiology
-
Fractures of the carpal bones account for 6% of all fractures.
-
Fracture of the scaphoid accounts for 70% of all carpal fractures:
-
75–80% of scaphoid fractures occur through the waist of the bone.
-
15–20% through the proximal pole
-
10–15% through the distal pole
-
-
Young adult males are the most common patient (children: Distal radial physis fails before scaphoid fracture; older adults: Distal radial metaphysis fails before scaphoid fracture).
Incidence
-
Incidence in athletes is unknown.
-
4-fold greater incidence in men compared to women (1)
Etiology
-
Most commonly described mechanism is hyperextension of wrist with radial deviation and axial loading of scaphoid onto radial rim
-
Usually associated with falls, athletic injuries, or motor vehicle injuries
-
Increased risk of nonunion in proximal pole fractures due to tenuous blood supply
Diagnosis
History
-
Patients report falling on the extended wrist or other wrist trauma.
-
Pain at the wrist, near base of the 1st metacarpal
-
Pain located at the “anatomical snuffbox”: Area on radial side of wrist between extensor pollicis brevis and extensor pollicis longus
-
Pain described as deep and dull made worse with gripping or squeezing
Physical Exam
-
Tenderness in anatomical snuffbox (waist fracture or distal pole fracture):
-
Bordered dorsally by tendon of extensor pollicis longus and volarly by extensor pollicis brevis and abductor pollicis longus
-
Sensitivity 90%, specificity 40% (2)
-
False positives may occur by compression of a sensory branch of the radial nerve as it crosses the snuffbox.
-
-
Tenderness of scaphoid tubercle:
-
Extend patient wrist and apply pressure at proximal wrist crease
-
Sensitivity 87%, specificity 57% (2)
-
-
Scaphoid compression test: Axially/longitudinally compressing patient's thumb along a line of the 1st metacarpal:
-
Some studies show poor predictive value (2).
-
Diagnostic Tests & Interpretation
Imaging
-
3 views of the wrist: Posteroanterior (PA), lateral, and “scaphoid” view, ie, anteroposterior view of wrist with 30 degrees supination and ulnar deviation
-
May request additional views: Radial oblique, ulnar oblique, and PA wrist with clenched fist in radial and ulnar deviation
-
Plain radiographs may be normal immediately after injury.
-
Fracture may become apparent 10–14 days after injury (immobilization allows demineralization of the fracture line).
-
Examine radiographs for evidence of the “Terry Thomas” sign (ie, widening of the scapholunate distance). Evidenced by >3 mm between the scaphoid and the lunate:
-
Indicates ligamentous injury to the scapholunate ligament
-
Bone scan:
-
Consider in patients with persistent snuffbox tenderness but negative plain radiographs
-
Cost-effective when compared to repeat radiographs (2)
-
Positive scan shows increased uptake at the scaphoid focally after 72 hr.
-
Excellent sensitivity (97%), but specificity (87%) is less than CT and MRI (3)
CT scan:
-
May be used to accurately help diagnose and delineate the fracture line and displacement
-
Sensitivity (93%) and specificity (99%) is similar to MRI (3).
MRI:
-
Consider when initial radiographs are negative and/or other ligamentous injury is suspected.
-
Sensitive (96%) and specificity (99%) (3)
-
Cost-effectiveness is unclear (2).
-
MRI shows diminished signal in T1-weighted and increased signal in T2-weighted images.
P.251
Differential Diagnosis
-
Scapholunate dissociation
-
Distal radius fracture
-
Wrist sprain
-
Arthritis
Treatment
Scaphoid fractures or suspected fractures with negative radiographs (2)[C]:
-
Immobilize in a thumb spica splint
-
Sling for comfort
-
Ice and elevation
Medication
-
Tylenol or NSAIDs as needed
-
Narcotics for breakthrough pain
Additional Treatment
-
Classification systems exist (Herbert, Mayo, etc.); however these classifications are not prognostic.
-
<1 mm separation of the fracture is generally considered nondisplaced (1).
-
Most nondisplaced fractures can be treated successfully with cast immobilization (1,2,4)[B].
-
Time to fracture union varies by location:
-
Distal pole (6 wks) < Waist (12 wks) < Proximal pole (3–6 mos) (1)
-
-
Thumb immobilization does not appear to reduce healing time or increase the risk of nonunion (2)[B].
-
Long arm cast (vs short arm) may decrease healing time but does not improve nonunion rates (1,2,4)[C].
-
Displaced fractures should be referred for surgical fixation (1,2)[B].
Additional Therapies
-
Associated injuries include fracture of the distal radius, radial head, and lunate; soft tissue ligamentous injury leading to scapholunate dissociation; and possible injury to the median nerve
-
Postoperative or postcasting hand therapy
Surgery/Other Procedures
-
Surgical intervention should be undertaken for displaced fractures (1,2,4)[B].
-
Also consider surgery for nondisplaced fractures in high-demand athletes/patients where the necessary length of casting would interfere significantly with competition, training, or work (1)[C].
-
Multiple surgical techniques can be used (dorsal open reduction internal fixation [ORIF], volar ORIF, percutaneous, arthroscopic assisted):
-
No current evidence to suggest one technique is superior:
-
Each has advantages and disadvantages.
-
-
Surgeon preference and experience is often the deciding factor in operative technique.
-
Ongoing Care
-
Avascular necrosis of the proximal fracture fragment, leading to wrist dysfunction and early osteoarthritis
-
High incidence of fibrous nonunion at the fracture site (8–10%)
-
Frequent malunion
-
Carpal instability
-
Post-traumatic arthritis
Follow-Up Recommendations
-
Nondisplaced waist or distal pole fracture can be treated closed by primary care physician.
-
Refer patients with displaced scaphoid fracture.
-
Consider referring patient with proximal pole fracture (prone to nonunion and avascular necrosis).
-
Consider referring high-demand patients with nondisplaced fractures.
References
1. Rizzo M, Shin AY. Treatment of acute scaphoid fractures in the athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2006;5:242–248.
2. Phillips TG, Reibach AM, Slomiany WP. Diagnosis and management of scaphoid fractures. Am Fam Physician. 2004;70:879–884.
3. Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, et al. Diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009.
4. Grewal R, King GJ. An evidence-based approach to the management of acute scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34:732–734.
Additional Reading
Beeres FJ, Rhemrev SJ, den Hollander P, et al. Early magnetic resonance imaging compared with bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1205–1209.
Ram AN, Chung KC. Evidence-based management of acute nondisplaced scaphoid waist fractures. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34:735–738.
Codes
ICD9
-
814.01 Closed fracture of navicular (scaphoid) bone of wrist
-
814.11 Open fracture of navicular (scaphoid) bone of wrist
Clinical Pearls
-
A scaphoid fracture is unlikely in the absence of tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox and at the scaphoid tubercle.
-
High-demand athletes may do better with early surgical fixation of even nondisplaced fractures, as this allows earlier return to activity.