Ewing Sarcoma and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of Bone

By admin On Oct 15, 2024

Ovid: Oncology and Basic Science

Editors: Tornetta, Paul; Einhorn, Thomas A.; Damron, Timothy A.

Title: Oncology and Basic Science, 7th Edition

> Table of Contents > Section
II – Specific Bone Neoplasms and Simulators > 6 – Bone Sarcomas >
6.2 – Ewing Sarcoma and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of Bone

6.2

Ewing Sarcoma and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of Bone

Bruce Rougraff

Ewing sarcoma was a feared cancer of childhood, with
very few survivors, prior to the use of chemotherapy, surgical
resection, and radiation. The disease manifests as chronic increasing
pain in the area of a lytic, destructive bone lesion of flat bones and
the diaphysis of long bones. The initial presentation is frequently
confused with osteomyelitis, and it can be mistakenly treated as that
for a period of time before the diagnosis is established. Ewing sarcoma
and a less virulent related disease, primitive neuroectodermal tumor of
bone (PNET), metastasize to lung,

P.188

bone,
and bone marrow most frequently. Current management includes biopsy,
staging, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical resection and/or radiation,
and further chemotherapy. The 5-year survival rate is 60% to 65% for
nonmetastatic disease and 25% to 30% for metastatic disease.

Pathogenesis

Etiology

Unknown; associated with reciprocal
translocation of chromosomes 11 and 22 (90% of cases), which involves
bands q24 and q12 of both chromosomes respectively
This results in a new chimeric EWS/FLI-1
fusion product, which produces the EWS/FLI-1 or MIC2 protein, stained
for by the CD99 immunohistochemistry marker.

Epidemiology

Third most common primary bone sarcoma (after osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma, respectively)
Three times less common than osteosarcoma
Rare in African-Americans (0.5% of Ewing cases); peak incidence in the second decade of life
Male:female ratio 1.3:1

Pathophysiology

Sheets of monotonous, small, round blue cells with indistinct cytoplasm (Fig. 6.2-1)
Glycogen granules in the cytoplasm can be seen after periodic acid Schiff (PAS) staining or with electron microscopy.
PAS-positive granules sensitive to digestion with diastase

Figure 6.2-1
This hematoxylin-and-eosin (H&E) staining shows typical Ewing
sarcoma features of monotonous sheets of small, round blue cells with
indistinct cytoplasm.

Figure 6.2-2
This CD-99 immunohistochemical staining shows positivity that is
consistent with Ewing sarcoma. Cytogenetics is used to confirm
Ewing/PNET (t11:22).
The nuclear chromatin is finely granular, with one to three small nucleoli per nuclei.
CD99 immunohistochemistry marker stains for EWS/FLI1 fusion or MIC2 protein, which is present in 90% of cases. (Fig. 6.2-2)

Classification

Ewing sarcoma: most common, least differentiated, worst prognosis
PNET: more neural differentiation, better prognosis
Askin’s tumor: primary in thoracopulmonary region, best prognosis

Diagnosis

Clinical Features

Typical age at diagnosis: 5 to 30 years
Rare in patients <5 years old; this distinguishes it from metastatic neuroblastoma
Usually presents as a painful mass
May be accompanied by fever and weight loss, which are poor prognostic signs

Radiographic Features

Location
- Typically originates in flat bones (pelvis, rib, clavicle) or the diaphysis of long bones (femur, tibia, humerus)
- Pelvis > femur > tibia > humerus
  
  P.189
  
  Figure 6.2-3 Anteroposterior pelvis radiograph of a 14-year-old with a lytic destructive iliac lesion.
Mostly, lytic destructive lesion with “onion-skinning” periosteal reaction (Figs. 6.2-3, 6.2-4, 6.2-5, 6.2-6, 6.2-7, and 6.2-8)
90% of patients have soft tissue mass.
A destructive, lytic, diaphyseal lesion in a child is two times more likely to be a Ewing sarcoma than an osteosarcoma.
A destructive, lytic, metaphyseal lesion in a child is 12 times more likely to be an osteosarcoma than a Ewing sarcoma.

Treatment

Surgical Indications/Contraindications

Traditionally surgery for Ewing sarcoma was reserved for expendable bones.

Figure 6.2-4 Computed tomographic scans demonstrating the lytic destructive changes of the ilium.

Figure 6.2-5 Anteroposterior radiograph of a 19-year-old with chronic hip pain. Note the cortical destruction and periosteal changes.

P.190

Figure 6.2-6
Magnetic resonance imaging shows large area of soft tissue involvement
without a stress fracture. This was diagnosed as a Ewing sarcoma of
bone and was treated with chemotherapy, wide resection, and bone
grafting.

Because of improved local control with
surgery compared to radiation alone, most Ewing sarcoma patients have
surgical resection if adequate margins are attainable and the defect is
reconstructable (Fig. 6.2-9).
Spine and acetabulum are sites that pose difficulties with resection and reconstruction.
Most resections are reconstructed with bone-grafting procedures.
- Frequent diaphyseal location lends itself to intercalary allograft reconstruction.
- Young age (small skeletal size) often requires expandable prostheses if growth plate has to be resected.

Figure 6.2-7 Subtle distal fibula lytic lesion without periosteal signs.

Results and Outcome

Local relapse rate with radiation alone is 25%; with surgery and radiation it is 8%.
It is unclear whether this difference affects survival.
Five-year disease-free survival rate for non-metastatic Ewing sarcoma is 60% to 65%.
- Recurrent disease after 5 years for patients with nonmetastatic disease is very unusual.
Five-year survival rate for patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis is 25% to 30%.

Postoperative Management

Early postoperative pain control is very important.
- Patient-controlled analgesia
- Regional and epidural pain management
Early rehabilitation emphasizing range of motion is critical.

P.191

Figure 6.2-8 Magnetic resonance imaging shows marrow replacement with tumor. This was diagnosed as a Ewing sarcoma.

Figure 6.2-9
The patient was treated with wide resection and chemotherapy. No
reconstruction was performed, and no instability of the ankle was noted
on follow-up examinations.
Avoid weight bearing until after bony union.
Long-term antibiotics for segmental allografts