CHAPTER 27 – 








CHAPTER 27 – Proximal Biceps Tenodesis from Cole & Sekiya: Surgical Techniques of the Shoulder, Elbow and Knee in Sports Medicine on MD Consult



















CHAPTER 27 – Proximal Biceps Tenodesis

Albert Tom, MD,
Augustus D. Mazzocca, MD

Biceps tendinopathy rarely occurs in isolation. Rather, it is usually associated with a spectrum of concomitant shoulder disorders, including subacromial impingement, rotator cuff tears, biceps instability, and SLAP tears. A diligent work-up is essential for correct identification and treatment of these associated pathologic entities.

The role of the long head of the biceps tendon has been heavily debated in the literature. Electromyography literature and biomechanical cadaver studies provide evidence of a role as a secondary humeral head depressor [7] [18]; this function appears more pronounced in the unstable shoulder.[1] Others, however, argue that the long head of the biceps tendon is a vestigial structure.

Although there is no clear consensus on the surgical treatment of symptomatic, refractory, isolated biceps tendinopathy, it is generally agreed that débridement is indicated for partial tears affecting 30% to 50% of the tendon substance. [1] [3] [19] Advocates of tenotomy base their approach on the benign natural history and good functional outcomes of traumatic biceps ruptures. However, complications such as cosmetic (“Popeye”) deformity due to distal retraction of the muscle belly, supination weakness, and muscle spasm have led to the development of numerous tenodesis techniques.[5] Recent series have reported a 70% incidence of Popeye deformity and 38% incidence of elbow flexion fatigue with tenotomy alone.[13]

Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis techniques are plentiful in the literature (
Table 27-1

). Described techniques include proximal fixation with interference screws, suture anchors, and suturing to the conjoined tendon, rotator cuff, and even transverse humeral ligament. Interference screw tenodesis demonstrated failure loads before tendon migration that were three times higher than after tenotomy alone in a cadaver model.[21] Failure of proximal stabilization has been attributed to the retention of diseased, inflamed, pain-generating tendon and synovium within the fixed confines of the intertubercular groove.[15] Securing the biceps tendon distal to the intertubercular groove with a subpectoral tenodesis approach removes the diseased tendon entirely and restores the proper biceps length-tension relationship to ensure optimal bicipital function. Biceps tenodesis is therefore recommended over biceps tenotomy for three reasons:

   1.    maintenance of the length-tension relationship of the biceps muscle by establishment of a new origin of biceps attachment at the appropriate length to prevent muscle atrophy;
   2.    maintenance of elbow flexion and supination strength for maximum elbow function; and
   3.    better cosmetic appearance.

Multiple biomechanical cadaver and animal studies have shown increased load to failure with biotenodesis techniques over suture anchor, keyhole, and tunnel techniques.[14] Our preferred surgical technique for the treatment of isolated biceps tendinopathy is an open subpectoral tenodesis with a biotenodesis screw, [10] [11] [17] which is discussed in this chapter.


Table 27-1 
 — Studies of Arthroscopic Tenodesis Techniques
Author   Study Results
Richards and Burkhart[16] (2005) Biomechanical cadaver study 7-mm biotenodesis screw vs. 2 7-mm biointerference screw: 233.5 ± 55.5 N
  Load to failure Mitek GII anchors 2 Mitek G2 anchors: 135.5 ± 37.8 N
Wolf et al[21] (2005) Biomechanical cadaver study Tenodesis vs. tenotomy Tenotomy: 110.7 N
  Load to failure   Tenodesis: 310.8 N
Ozalay et al[14] (2005) Biomechanical cadaver study Tunnel vs. interference screw vs. suture anchor vs. keyhole Tunnel: 229 ± 44.1 N
      Interference screw: 243.3 ± 72.4 N
  Load to failure   Suture anchor: 129.0 ± 16.6 N
      Keyhole: 101.4 ± 27.9 N
Jayamoorthy et al[5] (2004) Biomechanical sheep study Keyhole vs. biointerference screw vs. metal interference screw Keyhole: 303 N
  Load to failure   8-mm biointerference screw: 234 N
      Metal interference screw: 201 N
Mazzocca et al[9] (2005) Biomechanical cadaver study Subpectoral bone tunnel (SBT) vs. arthroscopic suture anchor (SA) vs. subpectoral interference screw (SIS) vs. arthroscopic interference screw (AIS) Cyclic gap formation:
  Load to failure and cyclic gap formation    SBT: 9.39 ± 2.82 mm
       AIS: 5.26 ± 2.60 mm
       SIS: 1.53 ± 0.60 mm
       SA: 3.87 ± 2.11 mm
      No differences in load to failure
Osbahr et al[13] (2002) Retrospective review Tenodesis vs. tenotomy No difference in cosmesis, pain, or spasm
Gill et al[4] (2001) Case series 30 biceps tenotomy, 19 months of followup 90% return to sports
      96.7% return to work
      13.3% complication rate (Popeye sign)
Boileau et al[2] (2002) Case series Biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation (8 or 9 mm) 90% strength of normal side
      No elbow motion loss
      2 initial failures (7-mm screw)
Nord et al[12] (2005) Case series Tenodesis with anchor through subclavian port 11 patients, 2-year followup: 90% good–excellent results
Kelly et al[6] (2005) Case series Tenotomy 68% good, very good, or excellent result
      70% Popeye sign
      38% fatigue with resisted elbow flexion



Preoperative Considerations


History

A typical history includes the following:

       Anterior shoulder pain radiating to biceps muscle
       Pain that awakens the patient from sleep
       Pain with forward shoulder elevation and forearm supination. Anteromedial pain is indicative of acromioclavicular joint disease.
       Association with other shoulder disease, typically rotator cuff tear


Physical Examination

       Pain in intertubercular groove that moves laterally with external rotation
       No pain with cross-arm adduction or acromioclavicular joint palpation
       Positive result of O’Brien, Speed, and Yergason tests
       Positive result of subpectoral biceps tenderness test[5]: pain with palpation of the biceps tendon under the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon. With the arm in neutral rotation, resisted internal rotation tensions the pectoralis major tendon. The biceps tendon can be palpated just distal to the inferior border of the pectoralis major, pressing laterally. Specificity of the subpectoral biceps tenderness test can be improved if a glenohumeral lidocaine injection provides symptomatic relief.


Imaging

       Anteroposterior, scapular oblique, and axillary views
       Magnetic resonance arthrography, if indicated
       Ultrasonography, if available


Indications and Contraindications

The decision to treat biceps disease surgically is predicated on a clinical presentation of bicipital groove pain, provocative test results, response to injection, and failed nonoperative management. Findings on arthroscopic examination may include biceps tendinosis occurring with or without concurrent rotator cuff disease, biceps tendinosis in association with superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions, and tendinosis secondary to instability of the biceps tendon. Instability of the biceps tendon can occur with disruption of the lateral aspect of the superior glenohumeral ligament and coracohumeral ligament, as observed in association with anterior supraspinatus tendon tears, or with disruption of the medial aspect of the coracohumeral ligament, often seen with a subscapularis tear. Instability of the biceps tendon is generally treated with a biceps tenodesis because reconstruction of the coracohumeral ligament attachment on the humerus has generally not been satisfactory.

Absolute contraindications to biceps tenodesis include any medical condition that precludes the safe administration of anesthesia or renders the patient unstable for operative intervention.


Surgical Technique


Anesthesia and Positioning

The senior author prefers beach chair positioning with interscalene block plus general anesthesia; the regional block alone is insufficient to anesthetize the axillary incision adequately. A complete examination under anesthesia is performed on both upper extremities to examine for concurrent pathologic processes of the shoulder or elbow.


Surgical Landmarks, Incisions, and Portals


Landmarks

       Coracoid
       Acromion
       Clavicle
       Pectoralis major tendon


Portals and Approaches

       Posterior portal
       Anterior portal
       Axillary fold incision at inferior border of pectoralis major tendon


Structures at Risk

       Axillary fold incision at inferior border of pectoralis major tendon: cephalic vein, musculocutaneous nerve (overzealous retraction), pectoralis major insertion (retraction)


Examination Under Anesthesia and Diagnostic Arthroscopy

Examination under anesthesia is performed to ensure full range of motion and glenohumeral stability.

Diagnostic arthroscopy evaluates the intraarticular biceps tendon, rotator cuff, glenoid labrum, glenohumeral ligaments, and chondral surface.


Specific Steps (
Box 27-1

)



 Arthroscopic Preparation

Glenohumeral arthroscopy is begun with a standard posterior viewing portal (
Fig. 27-1

). A dry inspection of the intraarticular biceps tendon is performed initially because the pump pressure will result in vascular compression, causing the tenosynovitis to be “washed out.” Injection or tendon fraying is indicative of bicipital disease. It is unknown how much biceps fraying can be accepted without the need for intervention, but some authors have proposed up to 30% to 50%. Additional inspection of the more distal tendon portions is accomplished by pulling the biceps tendon into the glenohumeral joint with a probe.

Box 27-1 

Surgical Steps

   1.    Arthroscopic preparation
   2.    Biceps tenotomy
   3.    Exposure
   4.    Tendon preparation
   5.    Tunnel preparation
   6.    Tenodesis
   7.    Closure

Figure 27-1 
Glenohumeral arthroscopy. A, Dry inspection. B, Inspection of the more distal tendon portions is accomplished by pulling the biceps tendon into the glenohumeral joint with a probe.



 Biceps Tenotomy

A basket forceps is inserted through the anterior cannulated portal to transect the biceps tendon at the superior labral junction (
Fig. 27-2

). Care is taken to avoid inadvertent damage to the superior glenoid labrum.

Figure 27-2 
A basket forceps inserted through the anterior cannulated portal to transect the biceps tendon at the superior labral junction.



 Exposure

With the arm slightly abducted and externally rotated, the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon is palpated. A 3- to 4-cm incision is performed in line with the axillary fold, with one quarter of the incision above and three quarters of the incision below the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon. A No. 15 blade scalpel is used to incise the subcuticular tissues. After hemostasis has been achieved with the electrocautery, Gelpi or Weitlaner self-retaining retractors are inserted to improve exposure. The overlying fatty tissue is cleared until the fascia overlying the pectoralis major, coracobrachialis, and biceps is identified (
Fig. 27-3

). Once the inferior border of the pectoralis major has been identified, the fascia overlying the coracobrachialis and biceps is incised in line with the incision. If these anatomic landmarks are not easily identified, the dissection is probably too lateral, especially if the cephalic vein is seen in the deltopectoral groove, in which case the dissection is also too proximal.

Figure 27-3 
Exposure of the pectoralis major muscle.


Blunt dissection with Mayo scissors and finger dissection sweep posterior to the pectoralis major tendon. The biceps tendon can be palpated in the intertubercular groove behind the pectoralis major tendon. A pointed curved Hohman retractor is placed on the lateral humeral cortex to retract the pectoralis tendon insertion superior and lateral. A blunt Chandler retractor is positioned on the medial cortex to retract the coracobrachialis and short head of the biceps. Vigorous medial retraction should be avoided to prevent injury to the musculocutaneous nerve. The long head of the biceps musculotendinous junction should be visualized. A right-angled clamp is then used to bluntly open the biceps sheath and deliver the tendon into the wound (
Fig. 27-4

).

Figure 27-4 
Delivery of the diseased biceps.



 Tendon Preparation

A No. 2 FiberWire (Arthrex, Inc., Naples, Fla) is used to sew a modified Krakow stitch starting 2.5 cm proximal to the musculotendinous junction (
Fig. 27-5

). The remaining tendon is removed sharply with a No. 15 blade scalpel. The two ends of FiberWire exiting the biceps tendon are tied together with a square knot.

Figure 27-5 
A modified Krakow stitch is sewn 2.5 cm proximal to the musculotendinous junction.



 Tunnel Preparation

The periosteum 1 cm proximal to the pectoralis major tendon is reflected sharply off the humerus, forming a rectangle measuring approximately 2 × 1 cm (
Fig. 27-6

). A 2.4-mm threaded guide pin is drilled up to but not penetrating the far cortex. The starting point is just proximal to the inferior edge of the pectoralis major tendon and situated in the intertubercular groove, centered in the medial to lateral direction on the humerus (
Fig. 27-7A

). Subsequently, an 8-mm reamer is used to overream the guide pin without violating the posterior cortex. The reamer is then carefully backed out by hand to avoid tunnel widening on exiting (
Fig. 27-7B

). A headlight may be used to assist with illumination. An Arthrex 8- × 12-mm biotenodesis screw is loaded on the tip of the cannulated tenodesis screwdriver. A nitinol loop retrieves a strand of FiberWire through the cannulated screwdriver. The retrieved FiberWire tensions the biceps tendon to the screwdriver tip, and a needle driver secures the FiberWire tightly against the handle of the screwdriver.

Figure 27-6 
Elevation of the periosteum.


Figure 27-7 
A, A threaded guide pin is drilled up to but not penetrating the posterior cortex. An 8-mm reamer is used to overream the guide pin, avoiding violation of the posterior cortex. B, The reamer is carefully backed out by hand to avoid tunnel widening on exiting.



 Tenodesis

The biceps tendon is pushed into the humeral tunnel and secured in place by the advancing biotenodesis screw until the screw head is countersunk. The tunnel may be tapped before screw insertion if dense cortical bone is encountered. After screw insertion, the biceps tendon should be draped over and covering the tenodesis screw. A right-angled clamp can be used to elevate the biceps tendon to ensure complete seating of the screw.


 Closure

After copious irrigation, 3-0 Monocryl buried sutures close the deep subcutaneous tissue. Steri-Strips are applied to the skin. The wound is injected with 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine).


Postoperative Considerations


Follow-up

Sutures are removed on the seventh postoperative day. The three-view radiographic examination is repeated to assess tunnel placement.


Rehabilitation

Postoperative management is dictated by concomitant procedures.


Isolated Biceps Tenodesis

       Progression from passive to active-assisted to full range of motion
       Strengthen at 12 weeks
       Full activity at 4 to 6 months
       If the intraoperative construct is resilient: return to work in 2 weeks
       Early full range of motion
       Functional rehabilitation


Rotator Cuff Repair

       Passive range of motion first 6 weeks, then progression from active-assisted to active range of motion
       Immediate elbow range of motion and grip strengthening


Acromioplasty

       Passive range of motion with rapid progression to active-assisted and active range of motion
       Immediate elbow range of motion and grip strengthening
       Follow isolated biceps tenodesis protocol


Complications

       Infection
       Spitting of subcutaneous sutures due to the very thin skin
       Construct failure
       Persistent pain
       Musculocutaneous or axillary nerve injury
       Humerus fracture
       Potential reaction to biodegradable screw
       Hematoma or seroma
       Functional tenotomy

PEARLS AND PITFALLS

       Make the incision more inferior, if desired, for dissection closer to the axilla. The fat stripe marks the inferior pectoralis border. The biceps tendon is under the pectoralis tendon.
       Place a curved Hohman retractor inferior to the pectoralis tendon and around the lateral cortex to retract the pectoralis superolaterally.
       Inadvertent placement of the Hohman retractor in the intertubercular groove may sweep the biceps medially and out of view. Remove and reposition the retractor if the biceps tendon is not visible.
       Place retractors before locating the tendon.
       Be careful not to plunge medially with the Chandler retractor—the brachial artery is at risk.
       Feel the intertubercular groove and the medial and lateral cortex to ensure centered guide pin placement.
       Ream 8-mm hole through near cortex only.
       For thick cortical bone, a tap is available for near cortex.
       Begin the modified Krakow stitch and transect the biceps tendon 2.5 cm from the musculotendinous junction. (Measurement from unpublished anatomic studies; the natural biceps contour dips down under the pectoralis. The biceps muscle peak is three or four fingerbreadths from the inferior edge of the pectoralis.)
       It is better to err too short rather than too long. It is difficult to overtighten the construct.
       Tie the ends of the modified Krakow stitch together before loading the tenodesis driver.
       The 8- × 12-mm biotenodesis screw is built for cortical fixation. The small taper makes it difficult to start.
       Ream to far cortex but do not ream on the way out, which widens the tunnel. Unchuck reamer at far cortex and reverse reamer out by hand.
       During screw insertion, the biceps tendon rotates around the screw. This is to be expected. The tendon drapes the screw when it is seated.
       The pectoralis major covers the biceps when the Hohman retractor is removed.
       Coagulate superficial bleeding vessels.


Results

Our experience includes 20 patients with more than 2 years of followup. The preoperative to postoperative scores averaged the following increases: Rowe score, 57 to 91; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 42 to 86; Simple Shoulder Test score, 5 of 12 to 10 of 12; Constant-Murley score, 45 of 75 to 67 of 75.


References

1.
Barber FA, Byrd JW, Wolf EM, Burkhart SS: How would you treat the partially torn biceps tendon?.
 Arthroscopy  2001; 17:636-639.

2.
Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Coste JS, Walch G: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: a new technique using bioabsorbable interference screw.
 Arthroscopy  2002; 18:1002-1012.

3.
Eakin CL, Faber KJ, Hawkins RJ, Hovis WD: Biceps tendon disorders in athletes.
 J Am Acad Orthop Surg  1999; 7:300-310.

4.
Gill TJ, McIrvin E, Mair S, Hawkins RJ: Results of biceps tenotomy for treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii.
 J Shoulder Elbow Surg  2001; 10:247-249.

5.
Jayamoorthy T, Field JR, Costi JR, et al: Biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical study of fixation methods.
 J Shoulder Elbow Surg  2004; 3:160-164.

6.
Kelly AM, Drakos MC, Fealy S, et al: Arthroscopic release of the long head of the biceps tendon.
 Am J Sports Med  2005; 33:208-213.

7.
Kilicoglu O, Koyuncu O, Demirhan M, et al: Time-dependent changes in failure loads of 3 biceps tenodesis techniques.
 Am J Sports Med  2005; 33:1536-1544.

8.
Kim SH, Ha KI, Kim HS, Kim SW: Electromyographic activity of the biceps branchii muscle in shoulders with anterior instability.
 Arthroscopy  2001; 17:864-868.

9.
Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S, et al: The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis.
 Arthroscopy  2005; 21:1296-1306.

10.
Mazzocca AD, Rios CG, Romeo AA, Arciero RA: Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation.
 Arthroscopy  2005; 21:896.

11.
Mazzocca AD, Romeo AA: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in the beach chair position.
 Oper Tech Sports Med  2003; 11:6-14.

12.
Nord KD, Smith GB, Mauck BM: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using suture anchors through the subclavian port.
 Arthroscopy  2005; 21:248-252.

13.
Osbahr DC, Diamond AB, Speer KP: The cosmetic appearance of the biceps muscle after long-head tenotomy versus tenodesis.
 Arthroscopy  2002; 18:483-487.

14.
Ozalay M, Akpinar S, Karaeminogullari O, et al: Mechanical strength of four biceps tenodesis techniques.
 Arthroscopy  2005; 21:992-998.

15.
Pfahler M, Branner S, Refior HJ: The role of the bicipital groove in tendopathy of the long biceps tendon.
 J Shoulder Elbow Surg  1999; 8:419.414

16.
Richards DP, Burkhart SS: A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques.
 Arthroscopy  2005; 21:861-866.

17.
Romeo A, Mazzocca AD, Tauro JC: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis.
 Arthroscopy  2004; 20:206-213.

18.
Sakurai G, Ozaki J, Tomita Y, et al: Electromyographic analysis of shoulder joint function of biceps brachii muscle during isometric contraction.
 Clin Orthop  1998; 354:123-131.

19.
Sethi N, Wright R, Yamaguchi K: Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon.
 J Shoulder Elbow Surg  1999; 8:644-654.

20.
Verma NN, Drakos M, O’Brien SJ: Arthroscopic transfer of the long head biceps to the conjoint tendon.
 Arthroscopy  2005; 21:764.

21.
Wolf RS, Zheng N, Weichel D: Long head biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis.
 Arthroscopy  2005; 21:182-185.





This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More