Proximal Humerus Fractures

Ovid: Handbook of Fractures

Authors: Koval, Kenneth J.; Zuckerman, Joseph D.
Title: Handbook of Fractures, 3rd Edition
> Table of Contents > III – Upper Extremity Fractures and Dislocations > 15 – Proximal Humerus Fractures

15
Proximal Humerus Fractures
EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • Proximal humerus fractures comprise 4% to 5% of all fractures and represent the most common humerus fracture (45%).
  • The increased incidence in the older population is thought to be related to osteoporosis.
  • The 2:1 female-to-male ratio is likely related to issues of bone density.
ANATOMY
  • The shoulder has the greatest range of
    motion of any articulation in the body; this is due to the shallow
    glenoid fossa that is only 25% the size of the humeral head and the
    fact that the major contributor to stability is not bone, but a soft
    tissue envelope composed of muscle, capsule, and ligaments.
  • The proximal humerus is retroverted 35 to 40 degrees relative to the epicondylar axis.
  • The four osseous segments (Neer) (Fig. 15.1) are:
    • The humeral head.
    • The lesser tuberosity.
    • The greater tuberosity.
    • The humeral shaft.
  • Deforming muscular forces on the osseous segments (Fig. 15.1):
    • The greater tuberosity is displaced superiorly and posteriorly by the supraspinatus and external rotators.
    • The lesser tuberosity is displaced medially by the subscapularis.
    • The humeral shaft is displaced medially by the pectoralis major.
    • The deltoid insertion causes abduction of the proximal fragment.
  • Neurovascular supply:
    • The major blood supply is from the anterior and posterior humeral circumflex arteries.
    • The arcuate artery is a continuation of
      the ascending branch of the anterior humeral circumflex. It enters the
      bicipital groove and supplies most of the humeral head. Small
      contributions to the humeral head blood supply arise from the posterior
      humeral circumflex, reaching the humeral head via tendo-osseous
      anastomoses through the rotator cuff. Fractures of the anatomic neck
      are uncommon, but they have a poor prognosis because of the precarious
      vascular supply to the humeral head.
    • The axillary nerve courses just
      anteroinferior to the glenohumeral joint, traversing the quadrangular
      space. It is at particular risk for traction injury owing to its
      relative rigid fixation at the posterior cord and deltoid, as well as
      its

      P.166


      proximity
      to the inferior capsule where it is susceptible to injury during
      anterior dislocation and anterior fracture-dislocation.

Figure
15.1. Displacement of the fracture fragments depends on the pull of the
muscles of the rotator cuff and the pectoralis major.

(From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)
MECHANISM OF INJURY
  • Most common is a fall onto an outstretched upper extremity from a standing height, typically in an older, osteoporotic woman.
  • Younger patients typically present with
    proximal humeral fractures following high-energy trauma, such as a
    motor vehicle accident. These usually represent more severe fractures
    and dislocations, with significant associated soft tissue disruption
    and multiple injuries.
  • Less common mechanisms include:
    • Excessive shoulder abduction in an individual with osteoporosis, in which the greater tuberosity prevents further rotation.
    • Direct trauma, usually associated with greater tuberosity fractures.
    • P.167


    • Electrical shock or seizure.
    • Pathologic processes: malignant or benign processes in the proximal humerus.
CLINICAL EVALUATION
  • Patients typically present with the upper
    extremity held closely to the chest by the contralateral hand, with
    pain, swelling, tenderness, painful range of motion, and variable
    crepitus.
  • Chest wall and flank ecchymosis may be present and should be differentiated from thoracic injury.
  • A careful neurovascular examination is
    essential, with particular attention to axillary nerve function. This
    may be assessed by the presence of sensation on the lateral aspect of
    the proximal arm overlying the deltoid. Motor testing is usually not
    possible at this stage because of pain. Inferior translation of the
    distal fragment may result from deltoid atony; this usually resolves by
    4 weeks after fracture, but if it persists, it must be differentiated
    from a true axillary nerve injury.
RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION
  • Trauma series, consisting of AP and lateral (“Y”) views in the scapular plane as well as an axillary view.
  • Axillary is the best view for evaluation
    of glenoid articular fractures and dislocations, but it may be
    difficult to obtain because of pain.
  • Velpeau axillary: If a standard axillary
    cannot be obtained because of pain or fear of fracture displacement,
    the patient may be left in the sling and leaned obliquely backward 45
    degrees over the cassette. The beam is directed caudally, orthogonal to
    the cassette, resulting in an axillary view with magnification (Fig. 15.2).
  • Computed tomography is helpful in
    evaluating articular involvement, degree of fracture displacement,
    impression fractures, and glenoid rim fractures.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging is generally
    not indicated for fracture management, but it may be used to assess
    rotator cuff integrity.
CLASSIFICATION
Neer (Fig. 15.3)
  • Four parts: These are the greater and lesser tuberosities, humeral shaft, and humeral head.
  • A part is defined as displaced if >1 cm of fracture displacement or >45 degrees of angulation.
  • Fracture types include:
    • One-part fractures: no displaced fragments regardless of number of fracture lines.
    • Two-part fractures:
      • Anatomic neck.
      • Surgical neck.
      • Greater tuberosity.
      • Lesser tuberosity.
    • Three-part fractures:
      • Surgical neck with greater tuberosity.
      • Surgical neck with lesser tuberosity.
    • P.168


    • Four-part fractures.
    • Fracture dislocation.
    • Articular surface fracture.
Figure 15.2. A Velpeau axillary view can be obtained without abducting the shoulder.

(From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)
OTA Classification of Proximal Humerus Fractures
See Fracture and Dislocation Compendium at http://www.ota.org/compendium/index.htm.
TREATMENT
  • Minimally displaced fractures
    • Up to 85% of proximal humerus fractures are minimally displaced or nondisplaced.
    • Sling immobilization or swathe for comfort.
    • Frequent radiographic follow-up is important to detect loss of fracture reduction.
    • Early shoulder motion may be instituted at 7 to 10 days if the patient has a stable or impacted fracture.
    • Pendulum exercises are instructed initially followed by passive range-of-motion exercises.
    • At 6 weeks, active range-of-motion exercises are started.
    • Resistive exercises are started at 12 weeks.
  • Two-part fractures
    • Anatomic neck fractures: These are rare
      and difficult to treat by closed reduction. They require open reduction
      and internal fixation (ORIF) (younger patients) or prosthesis (e.g.,
      shoulder

      P.169



      hemiarthroplasty) and are associated with a high incidence of osteonecrosis.

      Figure 15.3. The Neer classification of proximal humerus fractures.

      (Reprinted with permission from Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:1077–1089.).)
    • Surgical neck fractures
      • If the fracture is reducible and the
        patient has good-quality bone, one can consider fixation with
        percutaneously inserted terminally threaded pins.
        • Problems associated with multiple pin
          fixation include nerve injury (axillary), pin loosening, pin migration,
          and inability to move the arm.
      • Irreducible fractures (usually interposed
        soft tissue) and fractures in osteopenic bone require ORIF with pins,
        intramedullary nails with or without a supplemental tension band, or
        plate and screws.
    • P.170


    • Greater tuberosity fractures: If they are
      displaced more than 5 to 10 mm (5 mm for superior translation), they
      require ORIF with or without rotator cuff repair; otherwise, they may
      develop nonunion and subacromial impingement. A greater tuberosity
      fracture associated with anterior dislocation may reduce on reduction
      of the glenohumeral joint and be treated nonoperatively.
    • Lesser tuberosity fractures: They may be
      treated closed unless displaced fragment blocks internal rotation; one
      must rule out associated posterior dislocation.
  • Three-part fractures
    • These are unstable due to opposing muscle
      forces; as a result, closed reduction and maintenance of reduction are
      often difficult.
    • Displaced fractures require operative fixation, except in severely debilitated patients or those who cannot tolerate surgery.
    • Younger individuals should have an
      attempt at ORIF; preservation of the vascular supply is of paramount
      importance with minimization of soft tissue devascularization.
    • Older patients may benefit from primary prosthetic replacement (hemiarthroplasty).
  • Four-part fractures
    • Incidence of osteonecrosis ranges from 13% to 35%.
    • ORIF may be attempted in young patients
      if the humeral head is located within the glenoid fossa and there
      appears to be soft tissue continuity. Fixation may be achieved with
      multiple Kirschner wire, screw fixation, suture or wire fixation, or
      plate and screws.
    • Primary prosthetic replacement of the humeral head (hemiarthroplasty) is the procedure of choice in the elderly.
      • Hemiarthroplasty is associated with unpredictable results from the standpoint of function.
    • Four-part valgus impacted proximal
      humerus fractures represent variants that are associated with lower
      rate of osteonecrosis and have had better reported results with ORIF (Fig. 15.4).
  • Fracture-dislocations
    • Two-part fracture-dislocations: may be treated closed after shoulder reduction unless the fracture fragments remain displaced.
    • Three- and four-part
      fracture-dislocations: ORIF is used in younger individuals and
      hemiarthroplasty in the elderly. The brachial plexus and axillary
      artery are in proximity to the humeral head fragment with anterior
      fracture-dislocations.
    • Recurrent dislocation is rare following fracture union.
    • Hemiarthroplasty for anatomic neck fracture-dislocation is recommended because of the high incidence of osteonecrosis.
    • They may be associated with increased incidence of myositis ossificans with repeated attempts at closed reduction.
  • Articular surface fractures
    • These are most often associated with posterior dislocations.
    • Patients with >40% of humeral head
      involvement may require hemiarthroplasty; ORIF should initially be
      considered in patients <40 years of age, if possible.

P.171


COMPLICATIONS
Figure 15.4. Drawing showing the anatomy of a valgus-impacted four-part fracture.

(From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)
  • Vascular injury: This is infrequent (5%
    to 6%); the axillary artery is the most common site (proximal to
    anterior circumflex artery). The incidence is increased in older
    individuals with atherosclerosis because of the loss of vessel wall
    elasticity.
  • Neural injury
    • Brachial plexus injury: This is infrequent (6%).
    • Axillary nerve injury: This is
      particularly vulnerable with anterior fracture-dislocation because the
      nerve courses on the inferior capsule and is prone to traction injury
      or laceration. Complete axillary nerve injuries that do not improve
      within 2 to 3 months may require electromyographic evaluation and
      exploration.
  • Chest injury: Intrathoracic dislocation
    may occur with surgical neck fracture-dislocations; pneumothorax and
    hemothorax must be ruled out in the appropriate clinical setting.
  • Myositis ossificans: This is uncommon and
    is associated with chronic unreduced fracture-dislocations and repeated
    attempts at closed reduction.
  • Shoulder stiffness: It may be minimized
    with an aggressive, supervised physical therapy regimen and may require
    open lysis of adhesions for recalcitrant cases.
  • Osteonecrosis: This may complicate 3% to
    14% of three-part proximal humeral fractures, 13% to 34% of four-part
    fractures, and a high rate of anatomic neck fractures.
  • Nonunion: This occurs particularly in
    displaced two-part surgical neck fractures with soft tissue
    interposition. Other causes include excessive traction, severe fracture
    displacement, systemic disease, poor bone quality, inadequate fixation,
    and infection. It may be addressed with ORIF with or without bone graft
    or prosthetic replacement.
  • Malunion: This occurs after inadequate
    closed reduction or failed ORIF and may result in impingement of the
    greater tuberosity on the acromion, with subsequent restriction of
    shoulder motion.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More