Hand


Ovid: Handbook of Fractures

Authors: Koval, Kenneth J.; Zuckerman, Joseph D.
Title: Handbook of Fractures, 3rd Edition
> Table of Contents > III – Upper Extremity Fractures and Dislocations > 24 – Hand

24
Hand
EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • Metacarpal and phalangeal fractures are common, comprising 10% of all fractures; >50% of these are work related.
  • The 1998 United States National Hospital
    Ambulatory Medical Care Survey found phalangeal (23%) and metacarpal
    (18%) fractures to be the second and third most common hand and forearm
    fractures following radius fractures. They constitute anywhere from
    1.5% to 28% of all emergency department visits, depending on survey
    methods.
  • Location: Border digits are most commonly involved with approximate incidence as follows:
    • Distal phalanx (45%)
    • Metacarpal (30%)
    • Proximal phalanx (15%)
    • Middle phalanx (10%)
  • Male-to-female ratios run from 1.8:1 to
    5.4:1, with higher ratios seen in the age groups associated with the
    greatest incidence (sports injuries in the early third decade and
    workplace injuries in the fifth decade).
ANATOMY
Metacarpals
  • They are bowed, concave on palmar surface.
  • They form the longitudinal and transverse arches of the hand.
  • The index and long finger carpometacarpal articulation is rigid.
  • The ring and small finger carpometacarpal articulation is flexible.
  • Three palmar and four dorsal interosseous muscles arise from metacarpal shafts and flex the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints.
  • These muscles create deforming forces in
    the case of metacarpal fractures, typically flexing the fracture (apex
    dorsal angulation).
Phalanges
  • Proximal phalanx fractures usually angulate into extension (apex volar).
    • The proximal fragment is flexed by the interossei.
    • The distal fragment is extended by the central slip.
  • Middle phalanx fractures are unpredictable.
  • Distal phalanx fractures usually result from crush injuries and are comminuted tuft fractures.
MECHANISM OF INJURY
  • A high degree of variation in mechanism
    of injury accounts for the broad spectrum of patterns seen in skeletal
    trauma sustained by the hand.
  • P.258


  • Axial load or “jamming” injuries are
    frequently sustained during ball sports or sudden reaches made during
    everyday activities such as to catch a falling object. Patterns
    frequently resulting from this mechanism are shearing articular
    fractures or metaphyseal compression fractures.
  • Axial loading along the upper extremity
    must also make one suspicious of associated injuries to the carpus,
    forearm, elbow, and shoulder girdle.
  • Diaphyseal fractures and joint
    dislocations usually require a bending component in the mechanism of
    injury, which can occur during ball handling sports or when the hand is
    trapped by an object and is unable to move with the rest of the arm.
  • Individual digits can easily be caught in
    clothing, furniture, or workplace equipment to sustain torsional
    mechanisms of injury, resulting in spiral fractures or more complex
    dislocation patterns.
  • Industrial settings or other environments
    with heavy objects and high forces lead to crushing mechanisms that
    combine bending, shearing, and torsion to produce unique patterns of
    skeletal injury and associated soft tissue damage.
CLINICAL EVALUATION
  • History: a careful history is essential as it may influence treatment. This should include the patient’s:
    • Age
    • Hand dominance
    • Occupation
    • Systemic illnesses
    • Mechanism of injury: crush, direct trauma, twist, tear, laceration, etc.
    • Time of injury (for open fractures)
    • Exposure to contamination: barnyard, brackish water, animal/human bite
    • Treatment provided: cleansing, antiseptic, bandage, tourniquet
    • Financial issues: workers’ compensation
  • Physical examination includes:
    • Digital viability (capillary refill should be <2 seconds).
    • Neurologic status (documented by two-point discrimination [normal is 6 mm] and individual muscle testing).
    • Rotational and angulatory deformity.
    • Range of motion (documented by goniometer).
    • Malrotation at one bone segment is best
      represented by the alignment of the next more distal segment. This
      alignment is best demonstrated when the intervening joint is flexed to
      90 degrees. Comparing nail plate alignment is an inadequate method of
      evaluating rotation.
RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION
  • Posteroanterior, lateral, and oblique
    radiographs of the affected digit or hand should be obtained. Injured
    digits should be viewed individually, when possible, to minimize
    overlap of other digits over the area of interest.

P.259


CLASSIFICATION
Descriptive
  • Open versus closed injury (see later)
  • Bone involved
  • Location within bone
  • Fracture pattern: comminuted, transverse, spiral, vertical split
  • Presence or absence of displacement
  • Presence or absence of deformity (rotation and/or angulation)
  • Extraarticular versus intraarticular fracture
  • Stable versus unstable
Open Fractures
Swanson, Szabo, and Anderson

Type I: Clean wound without significant contamination or delay in treatment and no systemic illness
Type II: One or more of the following:
  • Contamination with gross dirt/debris, human or animal bite, warm lake/river injury, barnyard injury
    • Delay in treatment >24 hours
  • Significant systemic illness, such as diabetes, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, hepatitis, or asthma

Rate of infection: Type I injuries (1.4%)
Type II injuries (14%)
  • Neither primary internal fixation nor
    immediate wound closure is associated with increased risk of infection
    in type I injuries. Primary internal fixation is not associated with
    increased risk of infection in type II injuries.
  • Primary wound closure is appropriate for type I injuries, with delayed closure appropriate for type II injuries.
OTA Classification of Metacarpal Fractures
See Fracture and Dislocation Compendium at http://www.ota.org/compendium/index.htm.
OTA Classification of Phalangeal Fractures
See Fracture and Dislocation Compendium at http://www.ota.org/compendium/index.htm.
TREATMENT: GENERAL PRINCIPLES
  • “Fight-bite” injuries: Any short, curved
    laceration overlying a joint in the hand, particularly the
    metacarpal-phalangeal joint, must be suspected of having been caused by
    a tooth. These injuries must be assumed to be contaminated with oral
    flora and should be addressed with broad-spectrum antibiotics (need
    anaerobic coverage).
  • Animal bites: Antibiotic coverage is needed for Pasterella and Eikenella.
  • There are essentially five major treatment alternatives:
    • Immediate motion.
    • P.260


    • Temporary splinting.
    • Closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF).
    • Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
    • Immediate reconstruction.
  • The general advantages of entirely
    nonoperative treatment are lower cost and avoidance of the risks and
    complications associated with surgery and anesthesia. The disadvantage
    is that stability is less assured than with some form of operative
    fixation.
  • CRIF is expected to prevent overt
    deformity but not to achieve an anatomically perfect reduction. Pin
    tract infection is the prime complication that should be mentioned to
    patients in association with CRIF.
  • Open treatments are considered to add the
    morbidity of surgical tissue trauma, titrated against the presumed
    advantages of the most anatomic and stable reduction.
  • Critical elements in selecting between
    nonoperative and operative treatment are the assessments of rotational
    malalignment and stability.
    • If carefully sought, rotational discrepancy is relatively easy to determine.
    • Defining stability is somewhat more
      difficult. Some authors have used what seems to be the very reasonable
      criterion of maintenance of fracture reduction when the adjacent joints
      are taken through at least 30% of their normal motion.
  • Contraction of soft tissues begins
    approximately 72 hours following injury. Motion should be instituted by
    this time for all joints stable enough to tolerate rehabilitation.
  • General indications for surgery include:
    • Open fractures.
    • Unstable fractures.
    • Irreducible fractures.
    • Multiple fractures.
    • Fractures with bone loss.
    • Fractures with tendon lacerations.
  • Treatment of stable fractures:
    • Buddy taping or splinting is performed, with repeat radiographs in 1 week.
    • Initially unstable fractures that are
      reduced and then converted to a stable position: External
      immobilization (cast, cast with outrigger splint, gutter splint, or
      anterior-posterior splints) or percutaneous pinning prevents
      displacement and permits earlier mobilization.
  • Treatment of unstable fractures:
    • Unstable fractures that are irreducible
      by closed means or exhibit continued instability despite closed
      treatment require closed reduction or ORIF, including Kirschner wire
      fixation, interosseous wiring, tension band technique, interfragmentary
      screws alone, or plates and screws.
  • Fractures with segmental bone loss
    • These continue to be problematic. The
      primary treatment should be directed to the soft tissues, maintaining
      length with Kirschner wires or external fixation.

P.261


MANAGEMENT OF SPECIFIC FRACTURE PATTERNS
Metacarpals
Metacarpal Head
  • Fractures include:
    • Epiphyseal fractures.
    • Collateral ligament avulsion fractures.
    • Oblique, vertical, and horizontal head fractures.
    • Comminuted fractures.
    • Boxer’s fractures with joint extension.
    • Fractures associated with bone loss.
  • Most require anatomic reduction (if possible) to reestablish joint congruity and to minimize posttraumatic arthrosis.
    • Stable reductions of fractures may be
      splinted in the “protected position,” consisting of
      metacarpal-phalangeal flexion >70 degrees to minimize joint
      stiffness (Fig. 24.1).
    • Percutaneous pinning may be necessary to
      maintain reduction; severe comminution may necessitate the use of
      minicondylar plate fixation or external fixation with distraction.
  • Early range of motion is essential.
Metacarpal Neck
  • Fractures result from direct trauma with
    volar comminution and dorsal apex angulation. Most of these fractures
    can often be reduced closed, but maintenance of reduction may be
    difficult (Fig. 24.2).
    Figure
    24.1. Left: The collateral ligaments of the metacarpophalangeal joints
    are relaxed in extension, permitting lateral motion, but they become
    taut when the joint is fully flexed. This occurs because of the unique
    shape of the metacarpal head, which acts as a cam. Right: The distance
    from the pivot point of the metacarpal to the phalanx in extension is
    less than the distance in flexion, so the collateral ligament is tight
    when the joint is flexed.

    (From Rockwood CA Jr, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 4th ed, vol. 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:659.)
    Figure
    24.2. Reduction of metacarpal fractures can be accomplished by using
    the digit to control the distal fragment, but the proximal
    interphalangeal joint should be extended rather than flexed.

    (From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)
  • P.262


  • The degree of acceptable deformity varies according to the metacarpal injured:
    • Less than 10-degree angulation for the second and third metacarpals.
    • Less than 30- to 40-degree angulation for the fourth and fifth metacarpals.
  • Unstable fractures require operative
    intervention with either percutaneous pins (may be intramedullary or
    transverse into the adjacent metacarpal) or plate fixation.
Metacarpal Shaft
  • Nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures can be reduced and splinted in the protected position.
  • Operative indications include rotational
    deformity, dorsal angulation >10 degrees for second and third
    metacarpals, and >40 degrees for fourth and fifth metacarpals.
  • P.263


  • Ten degrees of malrotation (which risks
    as much as 2 cm of overlap at the digital tip) should represent the
    upper tolerable limit.
  • Operative fixation may be achieved with
    either closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (intramedullary or
    transverse into the adjacent metacarpal) or open reduction and plate
    fixation.
Metacarpal Base
FINGERS
  • Fractures of the base of the second,
    third, and fourth fingers are generally minimally displaced and are
    associated with ligament avulsion. Treatment is by splinting and early
    motion in most cases.
  • The reverse Bennett fracture is a fracture-dislocation of the base of the fifth metacarpal/hamate.
    • The metacarpal is displaced proximally by the pull of the extensor carpi ulnaris.
    • The degree of displacement is best
      ascertained via radiograph with the hand pronated 30 degrees from a
      fully supinated (anteroposterior) position.
    • This fracture often requires surgical intervention with ORIF.
THUMB
  • Extraarticular fractures: These are
    usually transverse or oblique. Most can be held by closed reduction and
    casting, but some unstable fractures require closed reduction and
    percutaneous pinning. The basal joint of the thumb is quite forgiving,
    and an anatomic reduction of an angulated shaft fracture is not
    essential.
  • Intraarticular fractures (Figs. 24.3 and 24.4):
    Figure
    24.3. The most recognized patterns of thumb metacarpal base
    intraarticular fractures are (A) the partial articular Bennett fracture
    and (B) the complete articular Rolando fracture.

    (From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)
    Figure
    24.4. Displacement of Bennett fractures is driven primarily by the
    abductor pollicis longus and the adductor pollicis resulting in
    flexion, supination, and proximal migration.

    (From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)

P.264



Type I: Bennett fracture: fracture
line separates major part of metacarpal from volar lip fragment,
producing a disruption of the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint; first
metacarpal is pulled proximally by the abductor pollicis longus.
Type II: Rolando fracture: requires
greater force than a Bennett fracture; presently used to describe a
comminuted Bennett fracture, a “Y” or “T” fracture, or a fracture with
dorsal and palmar fragments.
  • Treatment: Both type I and II fractures
    of the base of the first metacarpal may be treated with closed
    reduction and percutaneous pins, or ORIF.
Proximal and Middle Phalanges
Intraarticular Fractures
  • Condylar fractures: single, bicondylar, osteochondral
    • They require anatomic reduction; ORIF should be performed for >l mm displacement.
    • Comminuted intraarticular phalangeal
      fractures should be treated with reconstruction of the articular
      surface, if possible. Severely comminuted fractures that are deemed
      nonreconstructible may be treated closed with early protected
      mobilization.

P.265


Fracture-Dislocations
  • Volar lip fracture of middle phalangeal base (dorsal fracture-dislocation)
    • Treatment is controversial and depends on percentage of articular surface fractured:
      • Hyperextension injuries without a history
        of dislocation with <30% to 35% articular involvement: Buddy tape to
        the adjacent digit.
      • More than 30% to 35% articular
        involvement: Some recommend ORIF with reconstruction of the articular
        surface or a volar plate arthroplasty if the fracture is comminuted;
        others recommend nonoperative treatment with a dorsal extension block
        splint if the joint is not subluxed.
    • Dorsal lip fracture of middle phalangeal base (volar fracture-dislocation)
    • Usually this is the result of a central slip avulsion.
    • Fractures with <1 mm of displacement: may be treated closed with splinting, as in a boutonniere injury.
    • Fractures with >l mm of displacement
      or volar subluxation of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint:
      Operative stabilization of the fracture is indicated.
Extraarticular Fractures
  • Fractures at the base of the middle
    phalanx tend to angulate apex dorsal, whereas fractures at the neck
    angulate the apex volarly owing to the pull of the sublimis tendon (Fig. 24.5).

    P.266



    Closed reduction should be attempted initially with finger-trap traction followed by splinting.

    Figure
    24.5. Top: A lateral view, showing the prolonged insertion of the
    superficialis tendon into the middle phalanx. Center: A fracture
    through the neck of the middle phalanx is likely to have a volar
    angulation because the proximal fragment is flexed by the strong pull
    of the superficialis. Bottom: A fracture through the base of the middle
    phalanx is more likely to have a dorsal angulation because of the
    extension force of the central slip on the proximal fragment and a
    flexion force on the distal fragment by the superficialis.

    (From Rockwood CA Jr, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 4th ed, vol. 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:627.)
    Figure
    24.6. Fracture patterns seen in the distal phalanx include (A)
    longitudinal shaft, (B) transverse shaft, (C) tuft, (D) dorsal base
    avulsion, (E) dorsal base shear, (F) volar base, and (G) complete
    articular.

    (From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)
  • Fractures in which a stable closed
    reduction cannot be achieved or maintained should be addressed with
    closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or ORIF with minifragment
    implants.
Distal Phalanx (Fig. 24.6)
Intraarticular Fractures
  • Dorsal lip
    • A mallet finger may result from a fracture of the dorsal lip with disruption of the extensor tendon. Alternatively, a mallet

      P.267



      finger may result from a purely tendinous disruption and may therefore not be radiographically apparent.

    • Treatment remains somewhat controversial.
      • Some recommend nonoperative treatment for
        all mallet fingers with full-time extension splinting for 6 to 8 weeks,
        including those with a significant articular fracture and joint
        subluxation.
      • Others recommend CRIF for displaced
        dorsal base fractures comprising >25% of the articular surface.
        Various closed pinning techniques are possible, but the mainstay is
        extension block pinning.
    • Volar Lip
    • This is associated with flexor digitorum
      profundus rupture (“jersey finger:” seen in football and rugby players,
      most commonly involving the ring finger).
    • Treatment is primary repair, especially with large, displaced bony fragments.
Extraarticular Fractures
  • These are transverse, longitudinal, and comminuted (nail matrix injury is very common).
  • Treatment consists of closed reduction and splinting.
  • The splint should leave the PIP joint
    free but usually needs to cross the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint
    to provide adequate stability. Aluminum and foam splints or plaster of
    Paris are common materials chosen.
  • CRIF is indicated for shaft fractures with wide displacement because of the risk for nonunion.
Nailbed Injuries (Fig. 24.7)
  • These are frequently overlooked or
    neglected in the presence of an obvious fracture, but failure to
    address such injuries may result in growth disturbances of the nail.
    Figure
    24.7. An intimate relationship exists between the three layers of the
    dorsal cortex of the distal phalanx, the nail matrix (both germinal and
    sterile), and the nail plate.

    (From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)
  • P.268


  • Subungual hematomas should be evacuated with cautery or a hot paper clip.
  • If the nailplate has been avulsed at its
    base, it should be removed, cleansed with povidone-iodine, and retained
    for use as a biologic dressing.
  • Nailbed disruptions should be carefully sutured with 7-0 chromic catgut under magnification.
  • Polypropylene artificial nail dressings may be used if the original nailplate is not usable as a biologic dressing.
Carpometacarpal (CMC) Joint Dislocations and Fracture-Dislocations
  • Dislocations at the finger CMC joints are
    usually high-energy injuries with involvement of associated structures,
    including neurovascular injury.
  • Particular care must be given to the
    examination of ulnar nerve function, especially motor, owing to its
    close proximity to the fifth CMC joint.
  • Overlap on the lateral x-ray obscures
    accurate depiction of the injury pattern, and most authors recommend at
    least one variant of an oblique view.
  • When fracture-dislocations include the
    dorsal cortex of the hamate, computed tomography may be necessary to
    evaluate the pathoanatomy fully.
  • Most thumb CMC joint injuries are
    fracture-dislocations rather than pure dislocations. Terms associated
    with these fracture-dislocations are Bennett (partial articular), and
    Rolando (complete articular) fractures.
  • Dorsal finger CMC fracture-dislocations
    cannot usually be held effectively with external means alone. For those
    injuries that can be accurately reduced, CRIF is the treatment of
    choice.
Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) Joint Dislocations (Fig. 24.8)
  • Dorsal dislocations are the most common.
  • Simple dislocations are reducible and present with a hyperextension posture.
  • They are really subluxations, because some contact usually remains between the base of proximal phalanx and the metacarpal head.
  • Reduction can be achieved with simple
    flexion of the joint; excessive longitudinal traction on the finger
    should be avoided. Wrist flexion to relax the flexor tendons may assist
    reduction.
  • The other variety of MCP joint
    dislocation is a complex dislocation, which is by definition
    irreducible, most often the result of volar plate interposition.
    • Complex dislocations occur most frequently in the index finger.
    • A pathognomonic x-ray sign of complex dislocation is the appearance of a sesamoid in the joint space.
  • Most dorsal dislocations are stable following reduction and do not need surgical repair of the ligaments or volar plate.
  • Volar dislocations are rare but are particularly unstable.
  • Volar dislocations are at risk for late instability and should have repair of the ligaments.
  • Open dislocations may be either reducible or irreducible.

P.269


Thumb Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) Joint Dislocations
Figure
24.8. Simple metacarpophalangeal joint dislocations are spontaneously
reducible and usually present in an extended posture with the articular
surface of P1 sitting on the dorsum of the metacarpal head. Complex
dislocations have bayonet apposition with volar plate interposition
that prevents reduction.

(From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)
  • The thumb MCP joint, in addition to its
    primary plane of flexion and extension, allows abduction-adduction and
    a slight amount of rotation (pronation with flexion).
  • With a one-sided collateral ligament
    injury, the phalanx tends to subluxate volarly in a rotatory fashion,
    pivoting around the opposite intact collateral ligament.
  • The ulnar collateral ligament may have a
    two-level injury consisting of a fracture of the ulnar base of proximal
    phalanx with the ligament also ruptured off the fracture fragment.
  • Of particular importance is the proximal
    edge of the adductor aponeurosis that forms the anatomic basis of the
    Stener lesion. The torn ulna collateral ligament stump comes to lie
    dorsal to the aponeurosis and is thus prevented from healing to its
    anatomic insertion on the volar, ulnar base of the proximal phalanx (Fig. 24.9).
  • The true incidence of the Stener lesion remains unknown, because of widely disparate reports.
  • Nonoperative management is the mainstay of treatment for thumb MCP joint injuries.
  • Surgical management of thumb MCP joint
    injuries is largely limited to ulna collateral ligament disruptions
    with a Stener lesion and volar or irreducible MCP dislocations.

P.270


Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) Joint Dislocations
Figure
24.9. The Stener lesion: The adductor aponeurosis proximal edge
functions as a shelf that blocks the distal phalangeal insertion of the
ruptured ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb metacarpophalangeal
joint from returning to its natural location for healing after it comes
to lie on top of the aponeurosis.

(From Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al., eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.)
  • Dislocations of the PIP joint have a high rate of missed diagnoses that are passed off as “sprains.”
  • Although large numbers of incomplete
    injuries occur (especially in ball-handling sports), complete
    disruptions of the collateral ligaments and the volar plate are also
    frequent (50% occur in the long finger followed in frequency by the
    ring finger).
  • Congruence on the lateral radiograph is the key to detecting residual subluxation.
  • Residual instability is quite rare in
    pure dislocations, as opposed to fracture-dislocations, in which it is
    the primary concern.
  • Recognized patterns of dislocation other
    than complete collateral ligament injury are dorsal dislocation, pure
    volar dislocation, and rotatory volar dislocation.
  • Dorsal dislocations involve volar plate injury (usually distally, with or without a small flake of bone).
  • For pure volar dislocations, the
    pathologic findings are consistently damage to the volar plate, one
    collateral ligament, and the central slip.
  • Volar dislocation occurs as the head of
    proximal phalanx passes between the central slip and the lateral bands,
    which can form a noose effect and prevent reduction.
  • P.271


  • In pure dislocations, stiffness is the
    primary concern. Stiffness can occur following any injury pattern and
    responds best at the late stage to complete collateral ligament
    excision.
  • Chronic missed dislocations require open reduction with a predictable amount of subsequent stiffness.
  • Treatment
    • Once reduced, rotatory volar
      dislocations, isolated collateral ligament ruptures, and dorsal
      dislocations congruent in full extension on the lateral radiograph can
      all begin immediate active range of motion with adjacent digit
      strapping.
    • Dorsal dislocations that are subluxated on the extension lateral radiograph require a few weeks of extension block splinting.
    • Volar dislocations with central slip
      disruptions require 4 to 6 weeks of PIP extension splinting, followed
      by nighttime static extension splinting for 2 additional weeks. The DIP
      joint should be unsplinted and actively flexed throughout the entire
      recovery period.
    • Open dorsal dislocations usually have a
      transverse rent in the skin at the flexion crease. Debridement of this
      wound should precede reduction of the dislocation.
Distal Interphalangeal (DIP) and Thumb Interphalangeal (IP) Joint Dislocations
  • Dislocations at the DIP/IP joint are often not diagnosed initially and present late.
  • Injuries are considered chronic after 3 weeks.
  • Pure dislocations without tendon rupture
    are rare, usually result from ball-catching sports, are primarily
    dorsal in direction, and may occur in association with PIP joint
    dislocations.
  • Transverse open wounds in the volar skin crease are frequent.
  • Injury to a single collateral ligament or to the volar plate alone at the DIP joint is rare.
Nonoperative Treatment
  • Reduced dislocations that are stable may begin immediate active range of motion.
  • The rare unstable dorsal dislocation
    should be immobilized in 20 degrees of flexion for up to 3 weeks before
    instituting active range of motion.
    • The duration of the immobilization should
      be in direct proportion to the surgeon’s assessment of joint stability
      following reduction.
    • Complete collateral ligament injuries should be protected from lateral stress for at least 4 weeks.
  • Should pin stabilization prove necessary
    because of recurrent instability, a single longitudinal Kirschner wire
    is usually sufficient.
Operative Treatment
  • Delayed presentation (>3 weeks) of a
    subluxed joint may require open reduction to resect scar tissue and to
    allow tension-free reduction.
  • Open dislocations require thorough debridement to prevent infection.
  • P.272


  • The need for fixation with a Kirschner
    wire should be based on the assessment of stability, and it is not
    necessarily required for all open dislocations.
  • The duration of pinning should not be >4 weeks, and the wire may be left through the skin for easy removal.
COMPLICATIONS
  • Malunion: Angulation can disturb
    intrinsic balance and also can result in prominence of metacarpal heads
    in the palm with pain on gripping. Rotational or angulatory
    deformities, especially of the second and third metacarpals, may result
    in functional and cosmetic disturbances, emphasizing the need to
    maintain as near anatomic relationships as possible.
  • Nonunion: This is uncommon, but it may
    occur with extensive soft tissue injury and bone loss, as well as with
    open fractures with gross contamination and infection. It may
    necessitate debridement, bone grafting, or flap coverage.
  • Infection: Grossly contaminated wounds
    require meticulous debridement and appropriate antibiotics depending on
    the injury setting (e.g., barnyard contamination, brackish water, bite
    wounds), local wound care with debridement as necessary, and possible
    delayed closure.
  • Metacarpal-phalangeal joint extension
    contracture: This may result if splinting is not in the protected
    position (i.e., MCP joints at >70 degree) owing to soft tissue
    contracture.
  • Loss of motion: This is secondary to tendon adherence, especially at the level of the PIP joint.
  • Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: This may result from a failure to restore articular congruity.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More