Nonacute Elbow, Wrist, and Hand Conditions


Ovid: Manual of Orthopaedics

Editors: Swiontkowski, Marc F.; Stovitz, Steven D.
Title: Manual of Orthopaedics, 6th Edition
> Table of Contents > 20 – Nonacute Elbow, Wrist, and Hand Conditions

20
Nonacute Elbow, Wrist, and Hand Conditions
I. Basic Examination
  • History. As
    with any medical problem, the history of events leading up to the
    patient’s visit to the physician with an upper extremity problem is
    critical. The history should contain family history, social history,
    personal medical history unrelated to the musculoskeletal system,
    infectious disease history, and risk behavior history. Some additional
    key facts to record include the following:
    • Handedness. Is the patient right- or left-handed?
    • Work-relatedness.
      If the patient believes a problem is related to work or a series of
      events, it is the physician’s job to document the patient’s beliefs.
      The physician can do this by “quoting” the patient exactly. It is not the physician’s job or duty to question the veracity of a patient’s complaint.
    • Mechanism of onset.
      Record the details of the incident or accident as completely as
      possible. This is particularly relevant for motor vehicle accidents.
      Record details such as whether the patient was in the car, whether the
      air bags were deployed, whether the steering wheel was bent
      (particularly if the injured person was the driver), and the amount of
      damage done to the car.
    • Date of most recent tetanus booster. This is important with any direct trauma. Do not assume that another first examiner has resolved this issue.
  • Physical examination
    • General. At first glance, the upper extremity is a mirror of the lower. But, several key differences are obvious:
      • The shoulder has more freedom of motion and is consequently less stable than the hip.
      • The “patella” of the elbow is fused to the ulna as the olecranon.
        However, it performs a similar function to the patella in that it
        increases the “lever arm” for the attached muscle (triceps in the arm,
        quadriceps in the leg).
      • The elbow and wrist
        participate equally in guiding forearm rotation (supination and
        pronation). A similar motion is not available in the lower extremity.
      • The wrist has more motion and less bony stability than the ankle.
      • The fingers are longer in proportion to the palm than the toes in relationship to the midfoot.
      • The thumb is longer and is opposable to the digits.
    • Region specifics
      • Elbow
        • The elbow joint moves in a hinge manner
          at its articulation between the humerus and ulna. Thus, the
          ulnar-humeral articulation is uniaxial. In addition to its critical
          role in forearm rotation, the radius can transmit load to the humerus
          in “high-strength” situations. This issue is even more important if the
          elbow ligaments are injured. In general, the elbow gains minimal
          stability from muscle support and is reliant upon ligament support to
          guide joint motion.
        • Examination of this joint should document
          the active and passive arc of flexion and extension. Varus (lateral
          ligament loading) and valgus (medial ligament loading) should be
          assessed.
        • Standard radiographs include anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views.
      • P.284


      • Forearm
        • Rotation of the forearm is guided by bone
          support at the proximal and distal radioulnar joints (PRUJ and DRUJ,
          respectively). Additional stability and guidance for this motion is
          provided by the interosseous membrane.
        • Examination should record the active and
          passive arc of supination and pronation. Crepitance or pain at the PRUJ
          or DRUJ should be noted. Pain or swelling in the mid-forearm should be
          assessed.
        • Standard radiographs include AP and lateral views.
      • Wrist
        • The wrist moves in a multiaxial manner.
          The carpus is divided into a proximal (scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum)
          and distal (hamate, capitate, trapezoid, trapezium) row. Some of the
          key intercarpal articulations have more easily described relationships
          (the scaphoid moves relative to the lunate in flexion and extension).
          However, taken as a whole, the wrist is multiaxial and its motion is
          highly dependent on ligament function. There is no direct attachment of
          an extrinsic (forearm based) muscle or tendon to the bones of the
          proximal wrist. Thus, these bones (scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum)
          are 100% dependent on ligament integrity for function.
        • Examination
          should record passive and active arcs of flexion, extension, radial
          deviation, and ulnar deviation. Obvious pain or crepitance should be
          recorded as specifically as possible.
        • Standard radiographs
          include posteroanterior (PA) or AP and lateral views. If the scaphoid
          is the focus of attention, AP and lateral views of the scaphoid should
          be specifically requested. These are oblique to the normal PA and
          lateral views of the wrist.
      • Hand
        • The hand
          contains uniaxial (interphalangeal), multiaxial-stabilized (metacarpal
          phalangeal), and multiaxial-unstabilized (first and fifth
          carpometacarpal) articulations. Thus, these joints have varying degrees
          of ligamentous or muscle stability requirements. For example, the
          proximal interphalangeal joint of the index finger is dependent on
          ligament support. Whereas, the index finger’s metacarpophalangeal joint
          can be partially stabilized by hand intrinsic muscle support.
        • Examination
          should record active and passive arcs of flexion and extension for all
          joints. Thumb examination should additionally include ability to abduct
          (palmar and radial), adduct, retropulse (extend), and oppose. Joint
          stability should be tested and any masses or tenderness noted.
        • Standard radiographs
          include PA and lateral views. Note: To obtain a lateral view of a
          finger, the adjacent digits need to be moved aside. Similar to the
          scaphoid, “normal” thumb views are oblique to the hand.
        • Note: Always examine the opposite or unaffected side. This is particularly important when assessing stability.
II. Developmental Differences
  • Developmental birth conditions
    • Radial agenesis.
      Absence of the radius can be full or complete. Occasionally, this
      longitudinal deficiency is accompanied by thumb agenesis. An even more
      rare condition is presence of the radius and absence of the ulna. In
      either event, stability of the wrist is compromised. The deformity is
      often characterized with a “club hand.” The absence of the radius would
      then be termed a radial club hand. Full assessment of this condition
      requires complete assessment of the child to include renal,
      cardiovascular, neural, and other musculoskeletal regions (shoulder,
      elbow, and hand). If the child has associated anomalies, correction of
      the deformity at the forearm carpal articulation may actually
      compromise function. Thus, any direct treatment must consider the whole
      forearm and carpal articulation.
    • P.285


    • Syndactyly
      • This is the most common congenital hand condition (1 in 2,000 live births). The cause is not known. It is divided into simple (soft-tissue joining of two or more digits with no associated bone or joint anomaly) and complex
        (joining of two or more digits to include soft tissue and bones or
        joints) categories. Further subdivision is possible based on the length
        of the syndactyly. Complete syndactyly involves the whole length of the finger, whereas incomplete
        syndactyly does not. Simple syndactyly differences are often completely
        correctable. The complex differences, however, can occur in combination
        with other congenital differences (Apert syndrome).
      • In general, surgical correction of this
        difference should be performed as soon as is anesthetically feasible.
        Correction of a multiple finger difference is done in stages.
        Limitations of correction are often related to digital blood supply;
        usually, full-thickness skin grafts are required at surgery.
    • Polydactyly
      • This difference is classified into preaxial duplication
        (involvement of the thumb), central duplication (index, middle, or ring
        involvement), and postaxial duplication (small finger involvement). Postaxial duplication
        has a clear genetic component and is seen in as many as 1 in 300 live
        births. Correction of this difference usually involves excision. The
        degree of duplication and joint involvement determines the complexity
        of the procedure.
      • Treatment methods
        for thumb duplication generally focus on excision of an unstable
        duplicate thumb. Duplication of the thumb has been characterized to
        occur in at least seven different patterns. The outcome of thumb
        reconstruction depends on the ability to create a thumb of appropriate
        length, rotation, stability, and mobility and to integrate the thumb
        into the child’s daily routine. It is on this basis that earlier
        correction is generally recommended.
    • Madelung’s deformity.
      First described by Malgaigne in 1855 and later by Madelung in 1878,
      this difference of growth related to the distal epiphysis of the radius
      is believed to be congenital in nature, although it is usually not
      noted before adolescence. It is a rare, genetic condition transmitted
      in an autosomal dominant pattern. Because of incomplete growth of the
      radius, the clinical presentation may be prominence of the ulnar head
      (distal ulna). Alternatively, abnormal forearm rotation may be the
      presenting complaint. At present, pain may not be a component. The
      method of surgical correction (shortening of the ulna versus
      lengthening of the radius) is less important than the goal of obtaining
      and preserving stable, painless forearm rotation with full and
      unrestricted use of the wrist.
    • Brachial plexus
      • The brachial plexus comprises a
        coalescence of cervical and upper thoracic spine nerve roots. It
        traverses the space between neural foramina and the infraclavicular
        region where it again separates into individual nerves. Birth injuries
        relating to the brachial plexus are thought to represent an avulsion or
        stretch of the upper (Erb’s), lower (Klumpke’s),
        or both aspects (combined) of the brachial plexus. These injuries occur
        generally in the process of vaginal delivery of the child.
      • Critical to the examination
        of any child with a presumed brachial plexus lesion is verification of
        normal shoulder bony anatomy. The physician should document this by way
        of physical examination and shoulder radiographs confirming the
        shoulder (glenohumeral joint) is located.
      • Occasionally a child with nothing more than a fractured clavicle (birth related)
        will be mistaken to have a brachial plexus injury. Thus, it is
        important to include the clavicle in the physical examination of the
        infant. Generally speaking, a single AP chest radiograph suffices to
        detect such a fracture in the neonate.
      • P.286


      • Management of brachial plexus injuries at birth should include the following:
        • Documentation of glenohumeral joint status (located)
        • Documentation of passive mobility of all upper extremity joints, including cervical spine mobility
        • Documentation of observed active motion in shoulder, upper arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand
        • Initiation of twice-daily active-assisted “whole-arm” mobilization program to be completed by the care team or parents
        • Plan for follow-up examination on a
          frequent interval to verify understanding and completion of passive and
          active-assisted exercises and available joint motion (both passive and
          active—looking for change or improvement)
      • The prognosis
        for many brachial plexus injuries is for complete or near complete
        recovery. Children whose function remains compromised are evaluated and
        occasionally operated upon within the first 6 to 18 months of age. The
        treating physician who cannot document substantial improvement early
        (less than 6 months of age) should arrange further evaluation by an
        upper extremity specialist.
  • Delayed presentation of developmental differences
    • Cerebral palsy
      • Patients with cerebral palsy constitute
        the largest group of pediatric patients with neuromuscular disorders.
        The frequency varies from 0.6 to 5.9 patients per 1,000 live births.
        Difficulties related to this problem persist into adulthood. However,
        unlike many neuromuscular disorders, this condition does not progress.
        Relative progression of the disorder may occur in relation to growth,
        weight gain, or onset of degenerative change. However, any real
        progression should cause review of the original diagnosis. Generally,
        the problem relates to prenatal, natal, or early postnatal brain
        injury. The injury can express itself in a wide pattern, ranging from
        single limb to whole body involvement. Two clinical types of injury are
        seen:
        • Spastic type—represents an injury to pyramidal tracts in the brain. Exaggerated muscle stretch reflex and increased tone are seen.
        • Athetoid type—probably a lesion in the basal ganglia. Continuous motion of the affected part is present; this type is more rare.
      • Diagnosis is
        the first component of treatment. In cases with lesser involvement,
        diagnosis may not be obvious until the child fails to reach normal
        motor milestones or has difficulty with coordinated tasks. In some
        cases, the diagnosis is suspected because of early “under-use” of a
        part. For example, a child does not have a strong hand preference
        before 18 months of age.
      • Treatment of
        cerebral palsy should always focus on functional improvement. Surgery
        generally has a cosmetic benefit, but the initial goal should be to
        improve a specific function. Intelligence and sensory awareness of the
        child are the two biggest determinants for functional improvement after
        surgery. Improvements of arm function are possible by improvement in
        the position of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, hand, and thumb.
        Three of the more successful surgeries are release of an internal
        rotation/adduction spastic contracture involving the shoulder,
        release/rebalancing of a flexed and pronated spastic wrist/forearm, and
        release/rebalancing of a thumb into palm deformity.
III. Acquired Nonacute Dysfunction of The Elbow, Wrist, and Hand
  • Nerve. Nerve
    tissue is responsible for communication in two directions between the
    brain and the external environment (peripheral). Like the brain, nerve
    function is highly dependent on oxygen. Although depolarization of a
    single axon is energy independent, repolarization of the axon is
    dependent on adenosine triphosphate to run the Na+/K+ pump to “recharge” the axon potential. Thus, although local loss of O2 will not cause death of the peripheral axon cell body, local loss of O2 will affect the ability of the axon to conduct information. This change in conduction is generally transient, depending on O2 availability. However, frequent episodes of

    P.287



    reduced O2
    can produce permanent change in function. Common sites for nerve
    dysfunction to occur in the arm are the carpal canal (median nerve),
    the cubital tunnel (ulnar nerve), and the arcade of Froshe (posterior
    interosseous branch of the radial nerve).

    • Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)
      • Fig. 20-1
        depicts the carpal tunnel as seen from end on. The carpal tunnel is
        seen to be formed by the three bony borders of the carpus (trapezium,
        lunate, hook of hamate) and the transverse carpal ligament. As such, it
        is a defined space with a fixed volume. Changes in the fixed volume can
        occur as a result of actual changes in the bony outline resulting from
        late effects of trauma or arthritis. Also, relative change in volume
        available can be the result of mass effect occurring from tendon or
        muscle swelling or synovitis, presence of an anomalous muscle, or
        presence of an actual mass (e.g., lipoma). The patient with reduction
        in available volume is less able to tolerate or accommodate increases
        in pressure within the carpal canal. Thus, in patients with reduced
        carpal canal volume, provocative maneuvers such as Tinel’s (tapping or
        percussion of a nerve in a specific location), Phalen’s (flexion of the
        wrist causing indirect nerve pressurization), or Durkin’s compression
        test (manual pressure by examiner upon the median nerve) are more
        likely to be positive.
      • Presenting complaint is most commonly pain in the median nerve distribution. Pain is often exacerbated at night or by specific activities (1).
        As the syndrome advances, numbness occurs in the distribution of the
        median nerve. Weakness of the thenar muscles with associated wasting is
        a late stage event.
      • Laboratory testing.
        Radiographs to check for degenerative joint disease (DJD) or old
        fractures are occasionally of benefit. The most widely accepted
        diagnostic method is electrodiagnostic testing [electromyogram/nerve
        conduction velocity (EMG/NCV)]. This test can document slowing of nerve

        P.288


        conduction
        and early muscle denervation. The EMG is most specific if the symptoms
        have been present for at least 1 month. Given the association of
        hypothyroidism and rheumatologic discorders, testing of the thyroid
        stimulating hormone (TSH) and rheumatoid factor (RF) should be strongly
        considered. Finally, carpal tunnel syndrome is very common in
        pregnancy, and symptoms frequently resolve after delivery.

        Figure 20-1.
        The carpal tunnel is bounded by bone on three sides and by the ligament
        (transverse carpal) on one side. Guyon’s canal overlies the ulnar side
        of the carpal tunnel. The median nerve lies in the radial volar
        quadrant of the carpal canal. Generally, it is immediately below or
        slightly radial to the palmaris longus.
      • Treatment of
        CTS focuses on relief of pain. Initial therapy can include medication
        to relieve pain and swelling [nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
        (NSAIDs)], splint support, and exercises to increase mobility. No test
        or study has shown definite value for NSAIDs in management of CTS,
        except as they are related to relief of pain. An injection of
        corticosteroid into the carpal tunnel may be effective. There is some
        benefit from vitamin B6 and C oral therapy.
      • Surgery for
        relief of CTS symptoms is generally successful, with patient
        satisfaction exceeding 95% and complications less than 1%. The surgery
        can be completed by a variety of methods (open surgery versus
        percutaneous or arthroscopic-assisted release) without a clear benefit
        to one method versus another, as long as complete longitudinal division
        of the transverse carpal ligament is achieved along the ulnar half (1,2,3,4). Return to unrestricted activity after CTS surgery requires 4 to 8 weeks.
    • Cubital tunnel syndrome
      • The cubital tunnel
        is formed by the bony borders of the medial epicondyle and medial ulna
        and overlying soft-tissue constraints including the entrance between
        the ulnar and humeral head of the bipennate flexor carpi ulnaris. It is
        a defined space with a fixed volume. Changes in the fixed volume can
        occur as a result of actual changes in the bony outline as a result of
        late effects of trauma or arthritis (osteoarthritis or rheumatoid
        arthritis). Relative change in volume available can be the result of
        mass effect occurring from tendon and muscle swelling or synovitis.
        Laxity of the soft-tissue–supporting structures can allow the ulnar
        nerve to migrate out of the cubital tunnel and over the medial
        epicondyle during flexion. This motion is often referred to as
        subluxation of the ulnar nerve and produces a “Tinel-like” distal
        sensory disturbance.
      • Presenting complaint is most commonly pain in the distribution of the ulnar nerve distribution (5).
        Pain is often exacerbated at night or by specific activities. As the
        syndrome advances, numbness occurs in the distribution nerve. Weakness
        or atrophy of the hypothenar muscles is a late stage event.
      • Laboratory testing
        (thyroid function tests and rheumatoid factor) and radiographs (DJD,
        old fractures) are occasionally of benefit. The most widely accepted
        diagnostic test method is electrodiagnostic testing (EMG/NCV). This
        test can document slowing of nerve conduction and early muscle
        denervation. Again, the EMG is most sensitive if symptoms have been
        present for at least 1 month.
      • Treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome focuses on relief of pain (6).
        Initial therapy can include medication (NSAIDs) to relieve pain and
        swelling, provision of antielbow flexion splint support or pad, and
        exercises to increase mobility. No test or study has shown definite
        value for NSAIDs in management of cubital tunnel syndrome, except as
        related to relief of pain.
      • Surgery for
        relief of cubital tunnel symptoms is substantially less successful than
        surgery for relief of CTS. The surgery can be completed by a variety of
        methods (small versus large surgical exposure) without a clear benefit
        to one method versus another as long as the point of observed nerve
        compression is released (7). The patient returns to unrestricted activity 12 to 24 weeks after surgery.
    • PIN compression/other
      • The PIN (posterior interosseous) branch of the radial nerve travels through a defined space with a fixed volume. The tightest region of this

        P.289



        space is formed by a fascial connection at the proximal margin of the
        two heads of the supinator muscle in the proximal forearm (arcade of
        Froshe). Changes in the fixed volume can occur as a result of actual
        changes in the bony outline that result from late effects of trauma or
        arthritis. Relative change in volume available can be the result of
        mass effect occurring from tendon and muscle swelling or synovitis,
        presence of an anomalous muscle, or presence of an actual mass (e.g.,
        lipoma). The most common cause of nerve irritation in this region is
        believed to be the result of thickening of the facial margin in
        response to time (age) and stress.

      • Presenting complaint
        is most commonly pain in the general region of the supinator muscle.
        Pain is often exacerbated at night or by specific activities. As the
        syndrome advances, numbness does not occur. Weakness of the PIN
        innervated muscles with associated wasting is a late stage event.
      • The most widely accepted diagnostic test
        method is electrodiagnostic testing (EMG/NCV). PIN compression with
        this test is of substantially less benefit when compared with other
        nerve compression syndromes. Nonetheless, it shows muscle denervation
        in some cases.
      • Treatment of
        PIN syndrome focuses on relief of pain. Initial therapy can include
        medication to relieve pain or swelling (NSAIDs) and exercises to
        increase mobility. Splints may exacerbate the problem if placed over
        the nerve. Wrist splints to reduce load on wrist extensors (the wrist
        extensors cross over the supinator) are occasionally helpful. As with
        the other nerve compression syndromes, no test or study has shown
        definite value for NSAIDs in management of PIN syndrome.
      • Surgery for
        relief of PIN symptoms is substantially less successful than surgery
        for relief of CTS. A variety of surgical approaches have been
        described. The arcade of Froshe is identified and released. Return to
        unrestricted activity after surgery requires 12 to 24 weeks.
    • Other. Nerve
      compression can essentially occur wherever a nerve exits or enters a
      fascial plane/transition zone. The foregoing are the most common sites.
      Knowledge of extremity anatomy will aid the student in assessing other
      sites of suspected nerve entrapment.
  • Muscle and tendon.
    Muscles and tendons work together to generate and transmit force. The
    effect of load transfer depends on stable points of origin and
    insertion. Thus, at least three locations of function failure are apparent: (1) bone–muscle origin, (8) muscle–tendon junction, and (9) tendon–bone insertion. An example of each is provided.
    • Bone–muscle origin interface failure: lateral epicondylitis (Fig. 20-2)
      • Failure of the muscle origin
        of forearm extensors (lateral) or flexors (medial) is a common
        condition. The condition is uncommon in youths or persons of advanced
        age. It is occasionally seen in conjunction with working activities.
        Most often, the condition begins after a period of repetitive stress.
      • Presenting complaint
        is usually pain focused at the muscle origin. Resisted use of the
        muscle aggravates the condition. The pain usually subsides with rest.
        Swelling is rarely present; no mass is seen with this condition. Range
        of motion may be uncomfortable; but a full active or active-assisted
        range of motion should be possible.
      • Laboratory testing
        is of no particular value. Screening roentgenograms may be obtained but
        are generally normal for age. An injection test may be of confirmatory
        benefit (9). This is performed as outlined in Fig. 20-2.
        In this situation, the hope is that a precise injection of lidocaine
        with steroid into the area of extensor origin will eliminate or
        significantly alleviate the pain.
      • Treatment of
        epicondylitis focuses on reducing the stress at the “inflamed”
        interface. Theoretically, if the stress is low enough, the healing
        process can succeed in healing the injured interface. Thus, use of
        splints (Froimson barrel or forearm band) to reduce the load on the
        injured muscle origin, massage to increase the blood supply for
        healing, and stretching exercises to increase muscle excursion are all
        measures that are likely to

        P.290



        P.291



        provide success. The value of injections versus oral NSAIDs, rest, and splint support has not been clarified.

        Figure 20-2. A: The path of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) from lateral epicondyle to the base of the third metacarpal. B: The center of the epicondyle is the usual pain foci. C:
        Injection of lidocaine at the painful site. This should eliminate the
        pain. The injection is into the muscle origin, below the fascia. D:
        Postinjection strength testing usually reveals greater strength after
        pain is eliminated (successful injection). (From Putnam MD, Cohen M.
        Painful conditions around the elbow. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30(1):109–118.)
    • Muscle–tendon pathway failure results in trigger finger, trigger thumb, and de Quervain’s tenosynovity.
      • The junction
        between a specific muscle and its tendon is a potential site of
        failure. However, failure or pain at this location is uncommon in the
        upper extremity. Achilles tendinitis represents a condition occurring
        in the lower extremity. A similar condition does not occur in the upper
        extremity with any frequency. Problems along the tendon pathway,
        however, do occur.
      • Commonly referred to as trigger digits,
        snapping of flexor tendon function caused by bunching of the flexor
        synovium at the annular one (A1) pulley does occur. This condition is
        seen more often in older patients, although a congenital version is
        also common. The condition occurs more often in patients with diabetes.
        Patients with active tenosynovitis (rheumatoid arthritis) may have a
        condition that is often confused for tendon triggering. But, rheumatoid
        arthritis and synovitis in other patients can be distinguished from
        true trigger digit by the inability to obtain complete active flexion.
        This is the result of too much synovium “blocking” the active flexion
        of the digit (the excursion of the flexor tendon is blocked). In the
        case of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis, the problem is focused within the
        first dorsal extensor compartment of the wrist. The pathophysiology is
        the same, but this condition results in pain and crepitus along the
        tendon rather than triggering. The problem and degree of discomfort
        varies with time of day and activity.
      • Clinical diagnosis
        of trigger dysfunction is made based on pain or tenderness, crepitance,
        and locking focused at the A1 pulley of a specific digit.
      • Laboratory studies
        are essentially within normal limits. Radiographic studies are not
        generally useful. In the case of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis, a special
        clinical test (Finkelstein’s) is routinely performed. Finkelstein’s
        test is positive if ulnar wrist deviation combined with thumb adduction
        and flexion of the metacarpal phalangeal joint reproduces the patient’s
        complaint of pain.
      • Treatment of
        trigger digit and de Quervain’s synovitis includes rest, stretching
        exercises, steroid injection into the tendon sheath, and surgical
        release of the tendon sheath (3,4,5,6,7,8,11).
        If conservative care fails, response to supportive modalities is
        variable. In up to 60% of patients, the condition resolves after
        steroid injection (12). Surgical release of the sheath is thought to be 95% effective in those who fail to respond to lesser treatments (13).
    • Tendon–bone insertion failure results in mallet finger and biceps rupture.
      • Failure at
        the distal point of muscle action can occur as a result of attrition or
        age-related change, or excessive load. Occasionally, both methods are
        involved. Patients are usually seen for diagnosis soon after the
        failure occurs. Pain is usually less an issue than is weakness or
        dysfunction.
      • These conditions are diagnosed
        based on findings observed on clinical examination. Laboratory studies
        and roentgenographic findings are generally normal, the exception being
        when the extensor tendon involved with a Mallet finger pulls off a
        piece of the proximal aspect of the distal phalanx (thus, a “bony
        Mallet”). Larger tendon ruptures can be further clarified using
        magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) if there are unclear physical findings.
      • Treatment is
        based on the ability to reposition the specific insertion and maintain
        this in a resting position. For the terminal extensor–mallet finger, 6
        weeks of a conservative extension splint treatment is generally
        successful (8,10).
        Conversely, distal biceps ruptures will not heal without surgery
        because the tendon cannot be reliably positioned. However, because the
        muscle is a supporting elbow flexor (not the only elbow flexor),
        patients who do not require forceful supination (the biceps is the
        prime supinator) may choose to forego repair (and tolerate the
        functional limitations).
  • P.292


  • Joint.
    Painless, stable joint function is maintained by a combination of
    healthy cartilage, retained shape of the joint surface, ligamentous
    integrity, and muscle/tendon strength. Change in any of these four
    factors begins a process of increasing joint wear and dysfunction.
    Aging alone causes changes in the surface of the joint that accelerate
    wear. Most arthritic conditions of the arm
    are a combination of load, genetics, and history. However, it is
    occasionally possible to point to a single event many years earlier
    that has gradually led to joint dysfunction. Processes such as
    rheumatoid arthritis are usually the sole cause of dysfunction. Even in
    these diseases, isolated or cumulative trauma can play a role.
    • Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) (Fig. 20-3),
      wrist, and elbow DJD occur with decreasing frequency. Thumb CMC DJD may
      be the most common site of arthritic presentation. In any of the upper
      extremity sites, the most common presenting complaint is pain. To the
      degree that a specific joint is unstable, incongruous, or both, motion
      and stress aggravate symptoms. Certain activities and prior injury may
      predispose to arthritis, but underlying genetics is likely the most
      predominant cause.
    • Diagnosis is
      a combination of history, examination, laboratory study, and plain
      radiographs. MRI or computed tomography (CT) methodology is rarely
      useful. Most patients complain of pain after activity that is relieved
      by rest. Oral NSAIDs are of some benefit. However, care must always be
      taken with long-term administration of these medications, particularly
      in elderly patients.
    • Treatment begins with supportive splints and hot/cold modalities. Hand-based flexible splints are particularly helpful for thumb CMC.
    • At some point, many patients can no longer “tolerate” the pain. This is the time to consider surgery.
      Unlike the lower extremity, upper extremity arthritic surgery can offer
      patients reliable joint rebuilding procedures without resorting to
      joint replacements. An example of such an excisional arthroplasty is
      shown in Fig. 20-4. Such procedures report greater than 90% success rate relative to pain relief.
    • In the event that first-stage arthritic procedures do not work, newer and increasingly durable total joint replacement options are becoming available for the elbow, wrist, and the proximal interphalangeal joints.
  • Bone.
    Skeletal support is essential for function of the legs and arms. As
    such, immediate change (fracture) or gradual change (e.g., avascular
    necrosis, tumor) will alter the function of the arm or leg. Gradual
    change is rarely as painful as acute or fracture change in bone
    support. This may explain the late presentation for treatment of
    patients whose slow change process has progressed to the point at which
    curative or reconstructive treatment is no longer an option. Avascular
    necrosis of bone is a condition in which presentation and diagnosis are
    often delayed. As such, it is a good model to discuss the workup of
    bone pain.
    • Avascular necrosis, Kienböck’s (lunate) (Fig. 20-4), Presiser’s (scaphoid), and Panner’s (humeral capitellum)
      are focal avascular lesions of bone seen in the upper extremity.
      Genetics, overload, endocrine and systemic illness, and steroid use may
      play contributory roles. Patients usually have pain in the focal area
      and, on testing, it is usually possible to document a reduction in
      motion. Age of presentation varies from adolescence to late adulthood.
      Plain radiographs may reveal a change in bone density. In more advanced
      cases, the shape of the bone is altered. Change in shape is a precursor
      to diffuse arthritis.
      • Conservative treatment
        starts with making a definite diagnosis. This is true for any
        unexplained pain in bone. If the diagnosis confirms a focal change in
        bone vascularity without change in bone shape, initial treatment may
        focus on joint support. However, many patients, particularly those with
        Kienböck disease, do not gain sufficient pain relief from splints, and
        other joint “unloading” treatments are sought.
      • Surgical treatments
        for these processes can be broken down into treatments that reduce load
        on the injured bone segment, debride the injured bone segment, or
        replace/excise the injured bone segment. These treatments are likely to
        relieve pain in more than 80% of patients; however, full functional
        recovery rarely occurs.
        Figure 20-3. A and B: Loss of normal space between the metacarpal and trapezium typical of basilar joint thumb arthritis. C:
        After trapezial resection and stabilization of the first to second
        metacarpal, a new space for thumb carpometacarpal motion has been
        “created.”
        Figure 20-4. A: Posteroanterior (PA) wrist radiograph showing “collapse” of the lunate. B:
        Magnetic resonance imaging study of the same wrist from the same point
        in time showing essentially no vascular signal within the lunate
        marrow. C: PA wrist radiograph showing the capitate “seated” in the lunate fossae after excision of the lunate.
  • P.293



    P.294


  • Tumors. The
    upper extremity is the site of a variety of tumors, many of which are
    rare, some appearing almost exclusively on the hand and the arm, and
    still others are common to all regions of the body. Although most
    tumors of the upper extremity are benign, few present simple
    therapeutic problems. The close anatomic relation of the tumor to the
    nerves, vessels, and muscles in the upper extremity presents a great
    challenge to the treating surgeon.
    • Surgeons who treat hand and upper extremity tumors must be familiar with the wide range of possible diagnoses.
      Tumors that look innocent may not be; every mass should be considered
      potentially dangerous. This section focuses on primary malignant bony
      tumors of the upper extremity: diagnosis, evaluation, pathology, and
      treatment recommendations.
    • P.295


    • Symptomatic tumors,
      especially those that have increased in size, must be diagnosed and
      then classified as to stage. The patient’s clinical and family history,
      the physical characteristics of the lesion, and diagnostic images
      provide information to determine whether the growth is aggressive and
      should be “staged.”
    • Diagnostic strategies
      to accurately stage the lesion should be pursued before obtaining a
      biopsy. Appropriate evaluation includes a detailed history and
      proficient physical examination, imaging, and laboratory studies. The
      history should determine the length of time a lesion has been present,
      associated symptoms, and any incidence of family history. Physical
      examination requires detailed evaluation of the entire limb and
      testing, especially for sensibility, erythema, fluctuance, range of
      motion, tenderness, and adenopathy.
    • There are a few lesions that have significant associated blood chemistry changes.
      These include the elevated sedimentation rate of Ewing’s sarcoma and
      the serum protein changes in multiple myeloma. Serum alkaline
      phosphatase is elevated in metabolic bone disease and in some
      malignancies. A serum immunoelectrophoresis determines whether multiple
      myeloma is present.
    • Imaging
      further aids in determining the location of the tumor and the presence
      or absence of tumor metastasis. There are a variety of imaging
      techniques that are useful tools.
      • Plain films and tomography.
        Radiographs are of great importance in the diagnosis of bone tumors.
        Excellent technique is required to ensure good resolution of bone and
        adequate soft tissue surrounding the lesion. Plain films are the
        benchmark in predicting presence and location of bone involvement.
        Tomography or CT affords improved resolution.
      • MRI has
        recently developed as one of the more important tools for diagnosing
        bone tumors. It offers excellent delineation of soft-tissue contrast as
        well as the ability to obtain images in axial, coronal, and sagittal
        planes. Additionally, MRI can visualize nerve, tendon, and vessels and,
        with advanced protocols, cartilage can also be evaluated.
    • Classification of lesions.
      Correct treatment must always take into consideration the location and
      size of the tumor, the histologic grade and clinical behavior, and the
      potential for metastasis. If a lesion increases in size or becomes
      symptomatic, or if the physical or radiographic appearance suggests an
      aggressive lesion, appropriate staging studies including a tissue
      diagnosis (biopsy) must be obtained.
    • Specific tumors
      • Benign
        • Lipoma. This
          common tumor occasionally presents in the hand or wrist as a firm mass
          within a nerve or vascular passageway. As such, it may be associated
          with carpal tunnel syndrome. Its nature may be suspected based on
          clinical examination alone (mass). To understand its dimensions and
          relationship to adjacent tissues, an MRI scan is usually obtained.
          Excision (marginal) is the treatment of choice.
        • Enchondromas (Fig. 20-5)
          of the hand are common; they are sometimes multiple and often present
          after a fracture. Initial treatment in this circumstance is aimed at
          satisfactory fracture healing. They can clinically be confused with
          osteochondromas. Radiographic examination easily differentiates the two
          processes. Most randomly identified lesions can be observed; any lesion
          associated with pain or increasing size in adulthood should be more
          carefully studied. Treatment is either observation or intralesional
          excision. Occasionally, previously benign lesions recur or undergo
          malignant transformation (Fig. 20-5). Any such lesion should be biopsied and carefully considered for wide excision.
      • Malignant
        • Melanoma. The hand, wrist, and forearm are common sites of melanoma. Any change in a pigmented lesion warrants biopsy.
          Figure 20-5. A: Posteroanterior radiograph showing bone changes consistent with multiple enchondromas. B: Longitudinal section of the small finger. Pathology seen was consistent with low-grade chonorosarcoma. C:
          Preoperative clinical photo showing multiple digit enlargements. In
          this case, the patient noted rapid enlargement of the small finger
          during several months before surgery. (From Putnam MD, Cohen M.
          Malignant bony tumors of the upper extremity. Hand Clin 1995;11(2):265–286.)
        • P.296



          P.297


        • Osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma.
          Malignant bone lesions do occur in the arm. Most distal lesions are
          likely to represent degenerative change of benign processes (Fig. 20-5).
          Any bone or enlarging soft-tissue mass must always receive a complete
          evaluation (staging and biopsy) leading to a definitive diagnosis.
    • Metastasis.
      Lesions from elsewhere appearing as metastasis are the most common form
      of malignancy in the hand. This should be kept in mind, particularly
      for the patient who is not known to have a malignancy and whose lesion
      is not in keeping with local origin. A search for the primary tumor is
      appropriate.
  • Other factors: Workmen’s compensation.
    The hand is often the first tool in and last tool out of a dangerous
    situation. As such, it is the frequent site of workplace injuries (14).
    Not all injuries are clearly documented. It is the physician’s
    responsibility to remain the patient’s advocate while at the same time
    remaining an objective observer. Occasionally, these tasks are in
    conflict. Three simple rules apply in these situations:
    • Remain a dispassionate recorder of medical facts.
    • Search for an accurate diagnosis.
    • Offer no treatment without a specific diagnosis.
References
1. D’Arcy CA, McGee S. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA 2000;283:3110–3117.
2. Katz
JN, Keller RB, Simmons BP, et al. Maine carpal tunnel study: outcomes
of operative and nonoperative therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome in a
community-based cohort. J Hand Surg (Am) 1998;23:697–710.
3. Kay NR. De Quervain’s disease. Changing pathology or changing perception. J Hand Surg (Br) 2000;25:65–69.
4. Keller RB, Largay AM, Soule DN, et al. Maine carpal tunnel study: small area variations. J Hand Surg (Am) 1998;23:692–699.

P.298


5. Posner MA. Compressive neuropathies of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and wrist. Instr Course Lect 2000;49:305–317.
6. Mowlavi A, Andrews K, Lille S, et al. The management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of clinical studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:327–334.
7. Kleinman WB. Cubital tunnel syndrome: anterior transposition as a logical approach to complete nerve decompression. J Hand Surg (Am) 1999;24:886–897.
8. Foucher G, Binhamer P, Cange S, et al. Long-term results of splintage for mallet finger. Int Orthop 1996;20:129–131.
9. Smidt N, Assendelft WJ, van der Windt DA, et al. Corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Pain. 2002;96(1–2):23–40.
10. Geyman
JP, Fink K, Sullivan SD. Conservative versus surgical treatment of
mallet finger: a pooled quantitative literature evaluation. J Am Board Fam Pract 1998;11:382–390.
11. Rankin ME, Rankin EA. Injection therapy for management of stenosing tenosynovitis (de Quervain’s disease) of the wrist. J Natl Med Assoc 1998;90:474–476.
12. Zingas C, Failla JM, Van Holsbeeck M. Injection accuracy and clinical relief of de Quervain’s tendinitis. J Hand Surg (Am) 1998;23:89–96.
13. Ta KT, Eidelman D, Thomson JG. Patient satisfaction and outcomes of surgery for de Quervain’s tenosynovitis. J Hand Surg (Am) 1999;24:1071–1077.
14. Piligian
G, Herbert R, Hearns M, et al. Evaluation and management of chronic
work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the distal upper extremity. Am J Ind Med 2000;37:75–93.
Selected Historical Readings
de
Quervain F. On a form of chronic tendovaginitis by Dr. Fritz de
Quervain in la Chaux-de-Fonds. 1895. Illgen R, Shortkroffs, trans. Am J Orthop 1997;26:641–44.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More